Philosophy Now Forum

commonsense wrote: ↑Thu Feb 15, 2024 7:39 pmWhat are you implying—that promethean touched a girl inappropriately 10 or 20 years ago? Or did he do something similar?

I'll only say that prom is in no position to throw stones at Trump when it comes to lascivious behavior.

Let's admit the obvious—girls coming to age (we'll say 18) are a weakness for most men. It shouldn't be a shocker.

"I'll only say that prom is in no position to throw stones at Trump when it comes to lascivious behavior."

I'd throw a fuckin grenade at that sonofabitch. Speaking of lascivious, did u know that the four class F felony 'indecent liberties with a minor' i was charged with are statutorily defined as: a lewd or lascivious act with or upon the body of a minor... and i didn't touch nobody.

See what the cocksuckers did there? They seized the opportunity to take advantage of the semantic ambiguity of the word 'with' and claimed that being in the presence of a body constitutes a case of being 'with' a body... when they knew goddamn good and well what the word in the statute meant was 'in physical contact with'.

That F felony was meant for less severe physical contact crimes that aren't bad enough to be classed as battery or sexual assault crimes. Like when u get a job playing santa at the mall so leetle girls can sit on your knee. Shit like that. But they throw it at everyone.

But let's grant em that. Okay, what if i were twenty feet away. Thirty feet away. A hunerd. When, according to them, am i no longer 'with' the body?

U would not believe the kinds of crimes that that F felony has been attributed to. One guy got charged with it becuz he said something sexual to a minor on the phone three thousand miles away.

promethean75 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:36 am "I'll only say that prom is in no position to throw stones at Trump when it comes to lascivious behavior."

I'd throw a fuckin grenade at that sonofabitch. Speaking of lascivious, did u know that the four class F felony 'indecent liberties with a minor' i was charged with are statutorily defined as: a lewd or lascivious act with or upon the body of a minor... and i didn't touch nobody.

See what the cocksuckers did there? They seized the opportunity to take advantage of the semantic ambiguity of the word 'with' and claimed that being in the presence of a body constitutes a case of being 'with' a body... when they knew goddamn good and well what the word in the statute meant was 'in physical contact with'.

That F felony was meant for less severe physical contact crimes that aren't bad enough to be classed as battery or sexual assault crimes. Like when u get a job playing santa at the mall so leetle girls can sit on your knee. Shit like that. But they throw it at everyone.

But let's grant em that. Okay, what if i were twenty feet away. Thirty feet away. A hunerd. When, according to them, am i no longer 'with' the body?

U would not believe the kinds of crimes that that F felony has been attributed to. One guy got charged with it becuz he said something sexual to a minor on the phone three thousand miles away.

Of course I know the difference. The question I still have for you is...why didn't you take out a loan or front a few grand for a nice, long nosed, huge schlong faced, pilpul jewish lawyer???

You do realize that's how you "beat" the US legal system, right? You buy your way out of jail.

But you're still a novice to the whole Capitalism thing, seeing your reaction to your first Escalade.


You and Trump, same problem, you try to cheap-skate your legal problems...same results.

"is...why didn't you take out a loan or front a few grand for a nice, long nosed, huge schlong faced, pilpul jewish lawyer???"

Becuz lower class construction wage workers who own nothing but a truck don't get loans from banks.

But I wouldn't have fought the 2010 charges anyway (without that video footage)- with a lawyer or not - becuz if i had pled not guilty, and lost, I'd have gotten seven years instead of four.

Now check this out: why would the state believe i should do seven years instead of four but only if i chose to plead not guilty? If the state feels a suitable punishment is four years, it should ask for four years regardless of what i plead, right? So why the seven? Blackmail, that's why. A trap. The whole thing is a plea bargain game. If i plead not guilty and lose, the crimes deserve a more harsh punishment? Wtf does what i plead have to do with what kind of sentence i receive? See what's going on yet? If i cost the state more money by forcing it to go to trial, i get punished more severely. If i plead guilty (even tho I'm not) and spare the state those costs, i do less time.

So, how bad my crime is judged to be is based not on the degree of harm it causes the victim, but on how much money the state has to spend in my case. If this were not true, seven years would not be considered a suitable punishment.

Are u pickin any of this up? Do understand what I'm explaining here? This is your criminal justice system. All this happens in a room where a Bible sits on the corner of the judges bench.

"But you're still a novice to the whole Capitalism thing, seeing your reaction to your first Escalade."

Holy shit. U mean there are people who buy a second escalade? Damn i thought i was hot shit. Thanks for ruining that for me.

Fani Willis kicks off her testimony by accusing attorney of lying
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6y8kiChWzI

- This is the bush-league local district attorney who made Trump get a mugshot for identification purposes. Everyone is very excited that she and the Trump prosecutor, her lover of her patronage, are being exposed as corrupt grifters. She is a real piece of work. A globe trotter.
- She came storming into the courtroom uninvited, full of attitude, so they put her on the stand to strut her stuff. She speaks for herself.
- Quite entertaining. She is quite the talker. The upshot? She has perjured herself under oath, in a court of law, among other things. At one point she was loudly proclaiming, “I will not emasculate a black man!” Good grief.

*

‘It is a lie!’: Fani Willis ‘defiant’ facing questions from Trump co-defendant attorney
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFXmIBl7d8k

promethean75 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2024 12:34 pm"But you're still a novice to the whole Capitalism thing, seeing your reaction to your first Escalade."

Holy shit. U mean there are people who buy a second escalade? Damn i thought i was hot shit. Thanks for ruining that for me.

Sorry, my bad...the point I was going for though, is that since you're rolling in an Escalade, maybe you should consider a next step is having a big schlong nose lawyer on speed-dial. I mean, look what they're doing to Trump. You should know better, how Capitalism really works now.

- Here is a level of corruption that’s tough to ignore.

- The Left, which has corrupted Capitalism so that folks now call the corruption itself, Capitalism, has fined Trump half a $Billion$ to date with more to surely be larded on, and has banned him and his sons from doing business in New York.

- This is a delight to those who approve of the State crushing the Individual, and it's rather amazing that those who have been wronged by the system would support this level of corruption, which is a testimony to the powers of propaganda.

*

In another instance of totalitarian control and synchronicity, an imprisoned political rival of Putin's has just died in prison. Biden went on television and accused the president of Russia, of murder. And he was really angry, too. He made faces and raised his voice, totally devoid of irony, then said the quiet part outloud, that he should be more careful about what he says. And when he said it, yikes. A flash of clarity during dementia written all over his face, which is sad ... but he's the acting POTUS and that's the perspective.

At some point, probably during one of his many trials close to election time, Trump should become non-compliant and force the government to take him prisoner during the election season.

If he forced the issue after the election, people would just say Meh, so what. They would say, there's more important things than the destruction of the executive branch of government, and thus the constitution. For instance, there's the weather ... err, make that climate.

Force a constitutional issue. Experiencing an Epstein fate would be more difficult with the Secret Service sharing former President Trump's prison cell and protecting him from further corruption.

Unless Trump does that, by the time the election rolls around his name could be banned from all the ballots. His options are being whittled away and this process of corrupting the election looks like it has no limits. The destruction of USA from within proves that nothing is impossible.

(drumroll for a large, irrelvant graphic)

Walker wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2024 7:35 am- This is a delight to those who approve of the State crushing the Individual, and it's rather amazing that those who have been wronged by the system would support this level of corruption, which is a testimony to the powers of propaganda.

*

Exactly, which is why Prom needs to reverse course where it concerns Trump immediately!

What's it going to be Prom...give up your hatred for 'Capitalism', or your hatred for Trump?

You can't have both anymore.

Walker wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2024 7:35 am
- This is a delight to those who approve of the State crushing the Individual, and it's rather amazing that those who have been wronged by the system would support this level of corruption, which is a testimony to the powers of propaganda.

*

It's infinitely weird to hear people who want the government to stop people from having gay sex pretend like they care about individual liberty.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2024 12:38 pmIt's infinitely weird to hear people who want the government to stop people from having gay sex pretend like they care about individual liberty.

It's weird to hear a Westerner not understand the separation between Church and State.

Walker wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2024 7:35 am (drumroll for a large, irrelvant graphic)

ok

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2024 12:50 pm

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2024 12:38 pmIt's infinitely weird to hear people who want the government to stop people from having gay sex pretend like they care about individual liberty.

It's weird to hear a Westerner not understand the separation between Church and State.

It sounds like you're agreeing with me, which is a bit surprising.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2024 2:35 pm

Walker wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2024 7:35 am (drumroll for a large, irrelvant graphic)

ok

https://i.redd.it/5c3xin8vm1jc1.jpeg

Just the excuse you needed.

This is an example of a weak mind that says ... just following orders, when it suits my intent.

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2024 12:31 pm

Walker wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2024 7:35 am- This is a delight to those who approve of the State crushing the Individual, and it's rather amazing that those who have been wronged by the system would support this level of corruption, which is a testimony to the powers of propaganda.

*

Exactly, which is why Prom needs to reverse course where it concerns Trump immediately!

What's it going to be Prom...give up your hatred for 'Capitalism', or your hatred for Trump?

You can't have both anymore.

The implications are much larger than the misguided notions of one individual, and much larger than the significance of one lone individual being guided back to Truth, Justice, and The American Way.

February 17, 2024
The New York judge’s non-legal, hyper-partisan ruling will only make Trump stronger
By Andrea Widburg
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/20 ... onger.html

Commentary:
- I'm not so sure.
- The headline is wishful thinking.
- She is naive.
- This link partially explains the injustice and corruption, however, the evidence suggests that it doesn’t matter, and this will not alter the course of events. The nitty gritty of the corruption is there to be found. No need anymore to explain it away with BS.
- This is because what the link reveals is not a revelation at all. It is basic. Both Left and Right acknowledge this is what is happening, this is what has happened.

- For the Right, truth matters, as if that’s some natural law.
- For the Left, power matters. That is a natural law.