How believing in God can resolve moral conflict?

[bahman]

Several pages of thread comments for a title that has no meaning. A question that isn't a question. Ridiculous.

There are people like IC who thinks that believing in God can resolve moral conflict. So, the title and OP are completely relevant.

Can you even read?

Can you even read?

[vegetariantaxidermy]

There are people like IC who thinks that believing in God can resolve moral conflict. So, the title and OP are completely relevant.

Can you even read?

Can you even read?

Yes I can. You clearly cannot. Surely it can't be that difficult to google which word should go where, at least for a title? I don't care if English is your second or third or whatever language-- it can't be that hard to get it right. It's almost as if you do it deliberately.

[bahman]

Can you even read?

Can you even read?

Yes I can. You clearly cannot. Surely it can't be that difficult to google which word should go where, at least for a title? I don't care if English is your second or third or whatever language-- it can't be that hard to get it right. It's almost as if you do it deliberately.

So you don't understand the title?

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Can you even read?

Yes I can. You clearly cannot. Surely it can't be that difficult to google which word should go where, at least for a title? I don't care if English is your second or third or whatever language-- it can't be that hard to get it right. It's almost as if you do it deliberately.

So you don't understand the title?

It's neither a statement nor a question. It's meaningless. Read it your f'ing self you ridiculous creature.

[bahman]

Yes I can. You clearly cannot. Surely it can't be that difficult to google which word should go where, at least for a title? I don't care if English is your second or third or whatever language-- it can't be that hard to get it right. It's almost as if you do it deliberately.

So you don't understand the title?

It's neither a statement nor a question. It's meaningless. Read it your f'ing self you ridiculous creature.

How can believing in God resolve moral conflict? How about this one?

[vegetariantaxidermy]

So you don't understand the title?

It's neither a statement nor a question. It's meaningless. Read it your f'ing self you ridiculous creature.

How can believing in God resolve moral conflict? How about this one?

It's certainly an improvement. At least it's a question now.

[Immanuel Can]

Pope...

Is a Catholic, not a Christian. Let him speak for himself. I do not regard what he says, anymore than the Bible does.

God is simply not real.

"Good," I said. Not "God."

And I said, God, not good.

I didn't ask you about God. I asked you about "good."

Am I speaking Chinese here?

What's your conception of "good," beyond "What Bahman likes?"

Nothing, what pleases me is simply good.

Not in anybody else's world but your own, then.

So you can't ask me to explain why God doesn't live up to "what pleases Bahman" (ie. "the good"). It's neither any legitimate concern of mine, nor any of HIs whether or not you're pleased. And it doesn't define "the good" for anybody but you, apparently.

So I don't know what your real question can possibly be...at least, any that makes sense.

[Belinda]

A god is a supernatural being that childish idiots believe in because they were told bullshit by their parents.

Vegeteriann Taxidermy

God is not real

Bahman

God personifies absolute good.

Good is a word that describe some event or some thing.

Believers think good is not only a description like " It's good to save human lives" or " that's really good music" and so on but is also a thing , the good.

Believers also go a step further and think The Good is to be worshipped and The Good appreciates being worshipped . If you think The Good appreciates being worshipped or obeyed then you think The Good is a person.

Both Veggy and Bahman are correct as far as they go. However there is more to be said about God, and concepts of God ,than either Veggy or Bahman have mentioned.

Veggy's claim belongs with cultures of belief . Bahman's claim belongs with the nature of reality.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

FFS

[Walker]

FFS

Inarticulate as usual.

[bahman]

Pope...

Is a Catholic, not a Christian.

So anyone who believes in Jesus Christ but does not interpret the Bible as you do is not Christian.

Let him speak for himself.

But he has the authority of the mother Church and many people believe in his words. Many people, even prophesize him believing he is the link between God and people by Holy Spirit.

I do not regard what he says, anymore than the Bible does.

Ok, you are free to choose this. But many Christian believe otherwise. So back to my point, Bible is open to interpretation.

"Good," I said. Not "God."

And I said, God, not good.

I didn't ask you about God. I asked you about "good."

Am I speaking Chinese here?

If you don't cherry picking my comments then you will find that I answered that. I also answered what good is.

What's your conception of "good," beyond "What Bahman likes?"

Nothing, what pleases me is simply good.

Not in anybody else's world but your own, then.

So you can't ask me to explain why God doesn't live up to "what pleases Bahman" (ie. "the good"). It's neither any legitimate concern of mine, nor any of HIs whether or not you're pleased. And it doesn't define "the good" for anybody but you, apparently.

So I don't know what your real question can possibly be...at least, any that makes sense.

Whatever is pleasing to someone is good, whether it is me, IC, etc.

[bahman]

It's neither a statement nor a question. It's meaningless. Read it your f'ing self you ridiculous creature.

How can believing in God resolve moral conflict? How about this one?

It's certainly an improvement. At least it's a question now.

Ok, I am happy that you are happy.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Is a Catholic, not a Christian. Let him speak for himself. I do not regard what he says, anymore than the Bible does.

That's hilarious. Not a real kristian like you eh?
It's not original either. Religioturds say that all the time, as if they are somehow a 'cut above' Why do people always have to feel a 'cut above' others? So which cult is the real kristian one? Methodist? Baptist? Mormon? Jehovah's Witness? Christadelphian? Presbyterian? Anglican? Apostolic? Episcopal? etc. etc. etc.... They all have one thing in common anyway. They all believe they are a 'cut above' catholics

[Dontaskme]

Is a Catholic, not a Christian. Let him speak for himself. I do not regard what he says, anymore than the Bible does.

That's hilarious. Not a real kristian like you eh?
It's not original either. Religioturds say that all the time, as if they are somehow a 'cut above' Why do people always have to feel a 'cut above' others? So which cult is the real kristian one? Methodist? Baptist? Mormon? Jehovah's Witness? Christadelphian? Presbyterian? Anglican? Apostolic? Episcopal? etc. etc. etc.... They all have one thing in common anyway. They all believe they are a 'cut above' catholics

It's all make-believe Veg

Right now, where do you think belief comes from?

Think about that question for a minute...does belief come from the believing brain?

Right now..literally ask your brain, that part of us that is supposed to be responsible for all our knowledge....ask it if God exists?...then just relax and listen, listen very carefully for the answer to come from the brain...you'll be pleasantly surprised when no answer comes, when all you will hear is silence.

If that does not make sense, ask yourself who is it that is asking the question does God exist?..ask your brain once again, who is asking if God exists...you will find no answer comes to that question yet again.

.

[Belinda]

Is a Catholic, not a Christian. Let him speak for himself. I do not regard what he says, anymore than the Bible does.

That's hilarious. Not a real kristian like you eh?
It's not original either. Religioturds say that all the time, as if they are somehow a 'cut above' Why do people always have to feel a 'cut above' others? So which cult is the real kristian one? Methodist? Baptist? Mormon? Jehovah's Witness? Christadelphian? Presbyterian? Anglican? Apostolic? Episcopal? etc. etc. etc.... They all have one thing in common anyway. They all believe they are a 'cut above' catholics

That's true. Religion is divisive unless you are careful not to be dogmatic. The way not to be dogmatic and also agree with the dogma of any religious sect is to understand the dogma of your choice is subjectively true.