Sounds like a blast.Wizard22 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2024 8:12 amI started browsing 4chan regularly a couple years ago—it's one of the last bastions of Free Speech remaining on the internet, sadly. Western society has degraded so quickly since the 00s... and it's crazy the amount of shilling and disinformation that goes on, on 4chan. It reminds me of my brief attempt to make an "absolutely free speech" forum back around the time of ILoveOpinions.com. Do you remember that? I can't remember its name anymore. But I learned a lot about absolute free speech. It doesn't work. It attracts pedophiles and scam bots that just spam the board non-stop 24-7.
That was the beginning of my "red-pill" journey. The masses cannot handle Free Speech, and must be protected from themselves.
...if 4chan falls, then I don't know what political and social dissenters will do. The world dissenters will be pushed across foreign culture boundaries, turning cultural wars into actual, physical wars.
ilp migration
Re: ilp migration
Re: ilp migration
lul, it was...until it wasn't
Then it was, again!
Then it was, again!
Re: ilp migration
It's definitely not for the faint-of-heart, lots of grotesquery there, but...
I get news from there, for example, heard about Princess Kate being missing, and having cancer, days before it hit mainstream news. This is commonplace. Furthermore, 4chan allows uncensored, unfettered opinions about world politics and events, which separates how the 'shilled' information and disinformation proliferates.
-
promethean75
- Posts: 7113
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:29 pm
Re: ilp migration
4chan is a haven for transgenders, pedos, transgender pedos, transgender pedo school shooters, pedo hunters, transgender pedo hunters, pedo hunter hunters and school shooter shooters. The pedo hunter hunter type is always defendin the pedos saying 'but they're victims of a mental illness or have an abnormal sexual preference and u just don't understand em and you're not being fair!'
-
promethean75
- Posts: 7113
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:29 pm
Re: ilp migration
"I smoke cigarettes and drink to not destroy whole universes on a whim. When I stop drinking, I destroy cosmoses." - Ecmandu
You're a bartender. Ecmandu is sitting at the bar. It's 2:01 a.m. He asks for a shot of jack. U hesitate. The bar stools start shaking. His eyes roll back in his head and his hands start glowing like Jean Gray's. He asks again, impatiently, his voice trembling with suppressed anger: 'can i have that shot please?'
What do u do?
You're a bartender. Ecmandu is sitting at the bar. It's 2:01 a.m. He asks for a shot of jack. U hesitate. The bar stools start shaking. His eyes roll back in his head and his hands start glowing like Jean Gray's. He asks again, impatiently, his voice trembling with suppressed anger: 'can i have that shot please?'
What do u do?
Re: ilp migration
Wait, how did he leave the basement he lives in?
-
promethean75
- Posts: 7113
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:29 pm
Re: ilp migration
Hyperdimensional teleportation. It can be used to move between whole dimensions or just through our 4d space.
Re: ilp migration
Awesome!promethean75 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:58 pm Hyperdimensional teleportation. It can be used to move between whole dimensions or just through our 4d space.
-
promethean75
- Posts: 7113
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:29 pm
Re: ilp migration
Double post
Last edited by promethean75 on Sat Jun 15, 2024 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
promethean75
- Posts: 7113
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:29 pm
Re: ilp migration
I should be obliged to post this here having mentioned PN's FD Pants at another site becuz I was stoned and forgot where I was.
Yes the concept of 'evil' obscures and makes difficult any comprehensive approach to solving that which we are engaged in experiencing and calling 'evil' becuz it makes the matter metaethical. It associates the fundamental problem - that of physical pain - with 'wrongness' in a moral sense, in a religious sense, and in doing so opens the doors for conflicting prescriptive philosophies and religions to do battle.
That being the case, the only way to avoid all that is to approach the problem, which is pain, not evil, in the same way one would attempt to devise a hedonic calculus to describe how society should be arranged... in such a way that pleasure and health is maximal and suffering and sickness is minimal. But becuz this cannot ever be a science (too many unknowns, variables, anomalies), the approach should be simplified and generalized. And u know what imma say next. People spend most of their time at a job or at home. Ergo, ways to maximize pleasure and minimize pain in these areas should be the focus. Ergo, a philosophy and/or theory that advocates giving the most amount of power and control to those who labor and live daily, so that they may minimize their suffering (incidentally which consists largely of excessive laboring with little unequal returns) and maximize their pleasure, is the one the vast majority of peoples want (but don't know becuz they dumb).
None of this involves talk of 'evil'. If a muhfucka kilt somebody, we'ont waste time tryna convince a jury or judge that what he did was 'evil', or that he 'knew right from wrong' and that he is 'responsible'. What we do is carefully examine the life and the fellow and infer from events and experiences in his life that he would logically, causally, come to believe what he does without a choice to (see FD Pant's doxastic belief seminar) and therefore not be able to conceive of what he did as 'wrong'. Maybe illegal, sure, but illegal isn't necessarily equivalent to 'wrong' in the sense being implied, either.
Yes the concept of 'evil' obscures and makes difficult any comprehensive approach to solving that which we are engaged in experiencing and calling 'evil' becuz it makes the matter metaethical. It associates the fundamental problem - that of physical pain - with 'wrongness' in a moral sense, in a religious sense, and in doing so opens the doors for conflicting prescriptive philosophies and religions to do battle.
That being the case, the only way to avoid all that is to approach the problem, which is pain, not evil, in the same way one would attempt to devise a hedonic calculus to describe how society should be arranged... in such a way that pleasure and health is maximal and suffering and sickness is minimal. But becuz this cannot ever be a science (too many unknowns, variables, anomalies), the approach should be simplified and generalized. And u know what imma say next. People spend most of their time at a job or at home. Ergo, ways to maximize pleasure and minimize pain in these areas should be the focus. Ergo, a philosophy and/or theory that advocates giving the most amount of power and control to those who labor and live daily, so that they may minimize their suffering (incidentally which consists largely of excessive laboring with little unequal returns) and maximize their pleasure, is the one the vast majority of peoples want (but don't know becuz they dumb).
None of this involves talk of 'evil'. If a muhfucka kilt somebody, we'ont waste time tryna convince a jury or judge that what he did was 'evil', or that he 'knew right from wrong' and that he is 'responsible'. What we do is carefully examine the life and the fellow and infer from events and experiences in his life that he would logically, causally, come to believe what he does without a choice to (see FD Pant's doxastic belief seminar) and therefore not be able to conceive of what he did as 'wrong'. Maybe illegal, sure, but illegal isn't necessarily equivalent to 'wrong' in the sense being implied, either.