Philosophy Now Forum

Advocate wrote: ↑Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:23 pm I'm talking about the infinitely recursive meta-möbius version, duh!

Same one.

What about it?

[quote=Skepdick post_id=493414 time=1612031089 user_id=17350]
[quote=Advocate post_id=493413 time=1612031013 user_id=15238]
I'm talking about the infinitely recursive meta-möbius version, duh!
[/quote]
Same one.

What about it?
[/quote]

You're wrong.

Advocate wrote: ↑Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:50 pm You're wrong.

OK, Avocado.

[quote=Skepdick post_id=493417 time=1612032780 user_id=17350]
[quote=Advocate post_id=493416 time=1612032636 user_id=15238]
You're wrong.
[/quote]
OK, Avocado.
[/quote]

Your ad hominem is level 3rd grade. Incidentally, that makes it head and shoulders above most.

Advocate wrote: ↑Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:59 pm Your ad hominem is level 3rd grade. Incidentally, that makes it head and shoulders above most.

What?

You get head from 3rd graders?

[quote=Skepdick post_id=493421 time=1612033606 user_id=17350]
[quote=Advocate post_id=493420 time=1612033176 user_id=15238]
Your ad hominem is level 3rd grade. Incidentally, that makes it head and shoulders above most.
[/quote]
What?

You get head from 3rd graders?
[/quote]

Obvi. I was the headmaster.

Metaphysics is a set of true statements that we build on top of what is obvious, physics.

The study of the being on the being

Advocate wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 6:06 pm ...any questions that can be answered logically but not empirically and do not depend on perspective.

Is this definition necessary and sufficient?

Can experience be Metaphysical topics?

Metaphysics is not only how we can know stuff but also ideas about existence itself.
Exploring ideas of what exists is basic to proper ethics.

Zarathustra wrote: ↑Tue Jul 20, 2021 10:49 pm

Advocate wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 6:06 pm ...any questions that can be answered logically but not empirically and do not depend on perspective.

Is this definition necessary and sufficient?

Can experience be Metaphysical topics?

Please see Heidegger for how your subjective experience in your habitat is the only truth you can know.

Belinda wrote: ↑Wed Jul 21, 2021 8:35 am
Please see Heidegger for how your subjective experience in your habitat is the only truth you can know.

I already agree with the statement 90%. But that would run the risk of being regarded as being subjectivist, relativist and overly sceptic?

Zarathustra wrote: ↑Wed Jul 21, 2021 12:39 pm

Belinda wrote: ↑Wed Jul 21, 2021 8:35 am
Please see Heidegger for how your subjective experience in your habitat is the only truth you can know.

I already agree with the statement 90%. But that would run the risk of being regarded as being subjectivist, relativist and overly sceptic?

Idealist but not subjectivist. The only transcendental ethics are good, truth, and beauty. Even justice is hammered out in experience.

Belinda wrote: ↑Wed Jul 21, 2021 6:22 pm
The only transcendental ethics are good, truth, and beauty. Even justice is hammered out in experience.

Could you elaborate further on that statement please? The only transcendental ethics?
Why does ethics have to be transcendental? Why good truth beauty?

Zarathustra wrote: ↑Fri Jul 23, 2021 9:51 am

Belinda wrote: ↑Wed Jul 21, 2021 6:22 pm
The only transcendental ethics are good, truth, and beauty. Even justice is hammered out in experience.

Could you elaborate further on that statement please? The only transcendental ethics?
Why does ethics have to be transcendental? Why good truth beauty?

I mean good, truth, and beauty transcend definitions, and are entirely subjective.