Philosophy Now Forum

bobevenson wrote:Unfortunately, you don't seem to realize that a divinely inspired prophet of all things spiritual, political and economic would hardly be likely to suggest anything that would lead to inflation, much less hyperinflation, both of which are crimes against humanity.

And yet you have?

I can only think that the reason is that you are the anti-baptist(as evidenced by your name), false prophet for 'Satan' and the 'Beast' who wishes to give our world to them, Matthew 7:15-20.

Of course you could just explain why FDP is wrong in his analysis of your proposal.

Gary Childress wrote:Is "Tor" really a name that we should assume would be that of the returning Jesus? Would Jesus name himself after what means "King" in Nigerian? Maybe it's the name of the anti-Christ?

Or maybe it's just all a load of old bollocks.

Although having said that I think if there was to be a 'second coming' the population of Christians who'd go for it are more likely to come from the African congregation as they are incredibly credulous in this respect and Nigeria is a good bet for such a thing. Personally I think it would be hysterical as I can't quite see the white American end-of-timers going for a black Jesus, so they'd think him the anti-christ and be on the wrong side in their Armageddon.

bobevenson wrote: It's easier to express doubt than to determine the truth.[/b][/size]

Although the truth is that your source was written in Greek so all this numerology and English gematria simplex is just tosh.

bobevenson wrote:First of all, please don't refer to Biblical wrapping paper, only the book of Revelation. ...

Hence you are the anti-baptist, false prophet for 'Satan' and the 'Beast' who rejects Christ's message. John 4:1-6, Deuteronomy 18:20.

Secondly, I can't respond to inane criticism of the AEP money system that has absolutely no basis in anything I've written.

It was exactly based upon what you have written, that you can't respond is due to the indefensible inanity of your ideas if not your insanity.

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote: I can't respond to inane criticism of the AEP money system that has absolutely no basis in anything I've written.

It was exactly based upon what you have written, that you can't respond is due to the indefensible inanity of your ideas if not your insanity.

You are not able to post anything I've ever written that would lead anybody to such a ridiculous conclusion.

You are a loon, as this whole thread is full of FDP's economic analysis of what you wrote about your taxation idea. That you are unable to address what appear to be a perfectly cogent critique about your idea just goes to show that you are unsuited to be here as it is definitely not to philosophize about your ideas and thereby improve them.

Arising_uk wrote:This whole thread is full of FDP's economic analysis of what you wrote about your taxation idea.

He's only capable of taxing my patience, not analyzing my taxation theory.

You have no theory, as he has amply shown.

bobevenson wrote:it is the government's responsibility to see that the total amount of money equals the total value of property, avoiding either inflation or deflation.

...

bobevenson wrote:It is the responsibility of government to ensure that the total money supply is approximately equal to the total value of property; otherwise, the result will be economic inflation or deflation.

...

bobevenson wrote: Inflation refers to the dilution in the value of money due to excess supply, which is controlled by the government. If the government allows the quantity of money to double, prices will double. Hyperinflation is when it takes a wheelbarrow of money to buy a loaf of bread like in the Weimar Republic of Germany.

...

bobevenson wrote:Unfortunately, you don't seem to realize that a divinely inspired prophet of all things spiritual, political and economic would hardly be likely to suggest anything that would lead to inflation, much less hyperinflation, both of which are crimes against humanity.

That completes the set. You have now admitted you are not a divinely inspired prophet.

Thank you, you are done now, go away.

FlashDangerpants wrote:

bobevenson wrote:it is the government's responsibility to see that the total amount of money equals the total value of property, avoiding either inflation or deflation.

...

bobevenson wrote:It is the responsibility of government to ensure that the total money supply is approximately equal to the total value of property; otherwise, the result will be economic inflation or deflation.

...

bobevenson wrote: Inflation refers to the dilution in the value of money due to excess supply, which is controlled by the government. If the government allows the quantity of money to double, prices will double. Hyperinflation is when it takes a wheelbarrow of money to buy a loaf of bread like in the Weimar Republic of Germany.

...

bobevenson wrote:Unfortunately, you don't seem to realize that a divinely inspired prophet of all things spiritual, political and economic would hardly be likely to suggest anything that would lead to inflation, much less hyperinflation, both of which are crimes against humanity.

That completes the set.

As a divinely inspired prophet, I stand 100% behind each of the above statements, and defy any economics professor or financial expert on Earth to prove me wrong.

So answer FDP's actual point which was that to do what you say you'd have to print trillions of dollars therefore leading to hyperinflation and a collapse of the US economy. In other words, how are you going to implement this policy of equalizing the money and this 'property' you talk about?

Yada, yada, yada, yawn...

So you keep repeating ad nauseam but that's not an answer to the question is it bob, the critique is that if you intend to implement your idea of equalizing money to this 'property' you will have to print trillions of dollars thereby causing rampant hyperinflation and crashing the US economy and the question is how will you avoid this?