Re: What's stopping us from seeing the truth?
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:40 am
I don't understand what you mean by this. Can you explain further please.Truth is the Absolute
at Canzookia.com
https://canzookia.com/
I don't understand what you mean by this. Can you explain further please.Truth is the Absolute
Mechaz wyman wrote:That implies that it is attainable for someone - care to say who?mtmynd1 wrote:reasonvemotion wrote:Truth? There is no truth, we are our own soothsayers. We create comfort zones to appease our fears.
Truth is the Absolute which is unattainable for the most common of us.
Brilliant! Kudos to you, atheist! Without any 'god' there wouldn't be any atheists or agnostics for you/they rely upon a concept of god so meaningless as to to uphold your/their weak arguments for the existence of a 'no-god', the pure opposition of 'a god'... your own being a prime example... if one is unable to "prove the existence of god" one should be able "prove the existence of no-god".chaz wyman wrote:I would agree that your statement is the statement of an ass.
reasonvemotion wrote:I don't understand what you mean by this. Can you explain further please.Truth is the Absolute
If your searching for truth try equal, it is absolute.reasonvemotion wrote:I don't understand what you mean by this. Can you explain further please.Truth is the Absolute
No its true there would be no atheists if the idea of god did not persist in the minds of idiots.mtmynd1 wrote:Brilliant! Kudos to you, atheist! Without any 'god' there wouldn't be any atheists or agnostics for you/they rely upon a concept of god so meaningless as to to uphold your/their weak arguments for the existence of a 'no-god', the pure opposition of 'a god'... your own being a prime example... if one is unable to "prove the existence of god" one should be able "prove the existence of no-god".chaz wyman wrote:I would agree that your statement is the statement of an ass.
mtmynd1 wrote:reasonvemotion wrote:I don't understand what you mean by this. Can you explain further please.Truth is the Absolute
Truth is the culmination of all that is, was and shall be which is the Absolute of all there can possibly be.
It cannot be so, if one considers relative truths. Can it?Truth is the culmination of all that is, was and shall be which is the Absolute of all there can possibly be.
reasonvemotion wrote:It cannot be so, if one considers relative truths. Can it?Truth is the culmination of all that is, was and shall be which is the Absolute of all there can possibly be.
The best our language can provide is using 'truth' with a small 't' and Truth using the capital 'T'. When using the 'small 't' we generally use it to identify more so the facts as we see/know them.reasonvemotion wrote:
It cannot be so, if one considers relative truths. Can it?
What arrogance you have.mtmynd1 wrote:The best our language can provide is using 'truth' with a small 't' and Truth using the capital 'T'. When using the 'small 't' we generally use it to identify more so the facts as we see/know them.reasonvemotion wrote:
It cannot be so, if one considers relative truths. Can it?
The 'capital T' Truth is the area of metaphysics that Aristotle (and many others) spoke of. .
Truth that is not absolute is no truth at all.reasonvemotion wrote:Which Truth is The True?
"Truth is so abstract that philosopher Nietzsche said “truth is a lie” (Magee) that the essence of the meaning of truth is a big lie; he said that we give the meaning of truth to something. Otherwise, Kant said that truth exists, that it is there and we just need to find it. However, each mind is a different world. So, the truth is relative to each person."
Atheism is for the unimaginative desperately preaching for others to embrace their otherwise weak arguments for a failed individualism.chaz wyman wrote: ... and based on so little
An atheist has nothing to prove, has no creed, and no belief system.mtmynd1 wrote:Atheism is for the unimaginative desperately preaching for others to embrace their otherwise weak arguments for a failed individualism.chaz wyman wrote: ... and based on so little