Philosophy Now Forum

Pure insight is believing in self pure thought that is done by perishing oneself through in pure insight we see absolute being.

Typist wrote:

noen wrote: Further, I mean it in all sincerity that I hope you get help for your mental illness.

So, in all your sincerity, you think dropping out of nowhere in to the middle of a thread someone has put months of work in to, and telling a total stranger that they are nuts is the best way to help them get treatment???

Sorry, what a complete load of crap.

But what the hell, I'm up for it. Based on the same lack of information and expertise you used in your analysis, I have concluded that in my expert opinion you are the one who is nuts, if you think we're going to buy your sincerity.

What Barbara said.

It isn't that hard to tell when a person is suffering from a mental illness. The word salad is primary indicator of schizophasia. The obsession to produce page after page after page of meaningless text is another indicator of mental illness. This is a treatable condition. Psycho tropic drugs to reduce the symptoms followed by cognitive-behavioral therapy works wonders.

"Based on the same lack of information and expertise you used in your analysis, I have concluded that in my expert opinion you are the one who is nuts"

Well your conclusion is obviously false as I can write coherent sentences with a clear meaning to any English speaker. I don't know for a fact that Barbara suffers from schizophasia but it seems highly likely and is something that should be looked into before it gets worse.

Exhibit A:
"Pure insight is believing in self pure thought that is done by perishing oneself through in pure insight we see absolute being."

This is a great example of word salad: a jumble of words that fail to form a coherent thought or even a grammatically correct sentence.

Typist,

Thank you for your kind support.

BB

Noen,

You've done nothing more than repeat your original assertion, which was baloney the first time you said it.

First, why should we assume that you (or anybody) is qualified to diagnose mental illness over the Internet? This theory seems highly implausible, and you've offered us nothing to back your assertion that you personally have this ability.

You have offered us documented evidence that you are highly unqualified to offer mental health advice. What kind of mental health professional would jump in to a thread with a total stranger on the Net, immediately tell the poster they need treatment, AND then declare their sincerity?

If you want to insult one of us, ok, that's allowed, we do it all the time. Just do it honestly. It's easy, here, watch.

Fuck off Noen, you clueless bozo, you don't know what the ding dong you're talking about, and we're not buying it.

See? Easy!

But sincerely Noen, I am deeply concerned with your social development, and am really trying to help you mature in to a credible human being, and more bullshit like that...

Barbara Brooks wrote:Thank you for your kind support.

You're welcome, but your reply wins for it's direct clear minded conciseness.

Typist said:

First, why should we assume that you (or anybody) is qualified to diagnose mental illness over the Internet?

I've not given a diagnosis, only my considered opinion. I am perfectly capable of telling when someone is sad or angry or happy. I can also tell that when someone posts 135 pages of incomprehensible nonsense that that persona may be suffering from mental illness.

If you want to insult one of us, ok, that's allowed, we do it all the time. Just do it honestly.

To be perfectly honest I don't want to insult people. That you think such behavior is ok is a problem and indicates this forum is poorly moderated. It's not an insult or anything that people should be ashamed of to suffer from a mental illness. It does not make you a bad person to be depressed or to have bipolar disorder or to suffer from schizophrenia. If I thought someone on a forum was highly depressed I would ask them to seek treatment before things got worse also.

There is nothing to be ashamed of. I hope that Barbara will get the help she deserves.

Typist,

Words can not say how grateful I am of your support.

BB

This blowhard warrior is pleased to be of service ma'am. Have words, will travel.

noen wrote:...
There is nothing to be ashamed of. I hope that Barbara will get the help she deserves.

Given the tone of your first post I doubt this.

But are you talking from some experience?

Neon,

I can not suffer fools gladly.

BB

Typist,

Thank you again, I am honored knowing you and your gallantry.

These tyrants have irrational principles that are unnecessary pleasures and insatiable desires. A shameful sort it comes from having a cheap and mean parents their cheapness causes them to live a lawless life. " Lords over idleness and greed," Socrates calls them drones because when let loose they come buzzing around;

BB

People go around believing that nothing is honorable any more than dishonorable, or that just and good are not any more than unjust and bad. They argue for amusement, and are always refuting, like puppy-dogs, pulling and tearing at all who come near them they rejoice.

But when they get older, will no longer be guilty of such extremism; they will see truth, and not contradict for the sake of amusement; and their character will increase in the pursuit of honor.

The rhetorician has the show of knowledge without truth they will not use their memories; trusting someone other to remember because they can not themselves.They only have reminiscence not truth, they have learned anything only a semblance of knowing but generally know nothing.

A true philosopher devotes only the time saved from work and associations to philosophical pursuits. Even those of who are supposed to have a great philosophic mind when they come within sight of the great difficulty of dialectic away they go. They may go and hear a lecture on philosophy but are not considered philosophers.

There is perfection philosophers must reach and not to fall short of a point of mutual affinities, not until then will the pursuit of philosophy have any value. Philosophy ascends beyond sophistry takes successive steps from ideas through ideas and in ideas philosophy ends.

The way the world is today rights being pulled from under us, a fanancial crisis, military under scrutiny government incredibly corrupt we better have knowledge because the party is over and thei instant gratifications out the window.