Don't Vote

[bus2bondi]

then, then, alot of what some here would say 'strange' things started happening..

[bus2bondi]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkndVzfOeRc

[bus2bondi]

leaving alot out, before, in the middle, and after, what i'm getting at is, about the quote i shared in the beginning of the thread, is that why? why do people have to be 'intelligent in that way?' or forever doomed? i'm talking about 'political intelligence'. people are intelligent in so many varying ways. why shouldn't 'the people' be able to be that and just be that? is politics like medicine? should every patient be required to know the intracies of the various ins and outs of their very own veins in every single intricate way, as much as the doctor, before they are even let in the emergency room door? in order for it to work? politics is different than medicine isn't it? isn't it?

[bus2bondi]

and every political student that i know encounters the word 'legitimacy'. and 'balance of power' etc...

[Arising_uk]

leaving some things out, i was even going to be the first female secretary general of the united nations. i know, i know i could've done it.

Of course you could but apparently you didn't.

[Arising_uk]

then, then, alot of what some here would say 'strange' things started happening..

Not least your posts.

[bobevenson]

So when you say they were "blown away with it" you don't actually mean they agreed with it, which is what I believe they last said?

The man said, "What can I say? Your argument is fascinating, tightly reasoned, for sure. But I have to wonder, is it true?" Even though the paper represents everything his organization is totally against, he is totally accepting the possibility that it may all be true. And that, my friend, could only happen through divine intervention.

Yes, it can be interesting but ultimately false that what he's telling you. It's obvious that despite him finding it "interesting" he doesn't actually agree with you.

He didn't say he found the paper "interesting," he said it was so fascinating and tightly reasoned that he was open to the possibility that it was actually true.

[Arising_uk]

Whats actually true? There is no 'God' nor 'Satan', apart from the idiots who believe in such things, prophecy is bullshit-upon-stilts.

[bobevenson]

Whats actually true? There is no 'God' nor 'Satan', apart from the idiots who believe in such things, prophecy is bullshit-upon-stilts.

You don't know a f****** thing about the game of Ouzo, the book of Revelation or "The Ouzo Prophecy," so why don't you just give it up and go back to your sewing or whatever the fuck it is that you do.

[John]

He didn't say he found the paper "interesting," he said it was so fascinating and tightly reasoned that he was open to the possibility that it was actually true.

When someone writes "But I have to wonder, is it true?" it's a polite way of saying they aren't taking you seriously. The mistake they made was giving you a polite reply that you misunderstood. That seems pretty clear from their unwillingness to even reply to your emails now and as, you yourself describe, it the their refutation of your paper.

I don't expect you to accept anything I say though because you've abandoned reason on this matter.

[Arising_uk]

You don't know a f****** thing about the game of Ouzo, the book of Revelation or "The Ouzo Prophecy," so why don't you just give it up and go back to your sewing or whatever the fuck it is that you do.

Well, I know its a variation upon an old game that you are trying to flog to drinkers. The Book of Revelation is a book in the Bible which was knocked-up upon order of the Emperor to stop the heretical conflicts and apparently you've discovered something about it you can't state clearly. This something is in this 'prophecy' you've written but so far you can't say what it is that you are prophesying, apart from I think a black Jesus and I think you will get your wish there as Nigeria looks to be-up for a sectarian civil war and given the evangelical nuts who are out their I think many will be credible enough to accept a second-coming. Pretty much doubt the white end-timers will go for this tho', look how they accept the president.

Did you know that pretty much every post you get involved with soon devolves to your monomaniacal megalomaniacal obsession?

[bobevenson]

He didn't say he found the paper "interesting," he said it was so fascinating and tightly reasoned that he was open to the possibility that it was actually true.

When someone writes "But I have to wonder, is it true?" it's a polite way of saying they aren't taking you seriously.

Unfortunately, John, you're so totally full of shit that you simply don't realize it for some reason. You just can't get it through your head that the man was so impressed with the paper that it shooked the very foundation of his spiritual beliefs.

[bobevenson]

You don't know a f****** thing about the game of Ouzo, the book of Revelation or "The Ouzo Prophecy," so why don't you just give it up and go back to your sewing or whatever the fuck it is that you do.

Well, I know its a variation upon an old game that you are trying to flog to drinkers. The Book of Revelation is a book in the Bible which was knocked-up upon order of the Emperor to stop the heretical conflicts and apparently you've discovered something about it you can't state clearly. This something is in this 'prophecy' you've written but so far you can't say what it is that you are prophesying, apart from I think a black Jesus and I think you will get your wish there as Nigeria looks to be-up for a sectarian civil war and given the evangelical nuts who are out their I think many will be credible enough to accept a second-coming. Pretty much doubt the white end-timers will go for this tho', look how they accept the president.

Did you know that pretty much every post you get involved with soon devolves to your monomaniacal megalomaniacal obsession?

Just the fact that you mention a black Jesus shows you don't have the slightest f****** idea of what you're talking about. I think it's time for another cup of tea.

[John]

Ok Bob, if that's your interpretation then so be it. I don't think anyone else would agree with you though so on the matter of analysing a piece of text I think you're on your own there. You should at least be claiming no more than that someone from the Spiritual Counterfeits Project agreed with you (although I believe you to be completely wrong in this) but the organisation itself certainly does not agree with you now and possibly has never agreed with you.

[Arising_uk]

Just the fact that you mention a black Jesus shows you don't have the slightest f****** idea of what you're talking about. I think it's time for another cup of tea.

Just goes to show what an incoherent prophet you are. Ever though you might actually be the anti-baptist.