Philosophy Now Forum

Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 7:00 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:40 am

Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:33 am Oh, goodness, you're right. There's no pattern: you just hate me. I hallucinated that your hundreds of short, bilious posts were aimed all over the place.

More evasion, but getting more honest in your evasion; kudos.

They are easy to follow-- for anyone who isn't braindead.

Who said anything about your posts being hard to follow? The pitbull is angry. The pitbull is trying to bite my leg.

As you said, you just hate.

For some reason you justify it, sometimes, as if it's hard to face that you...just hate.

So I'm obliged to love you? Fuck off.

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 8:36 am

Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 7:00 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:40 am

They are easy to follow-- for anyone who isn't braindead.

Who said anything about your posts being hard to follow? The pitbull is angry. The pitbull is trying to bite my leg.

As you said, you just hate.

For some reason you justify it, sometimes, as if it's hard to face that you...just hate.

So I'm obliged to love you? Fuck off.

You manage to pack of lot of weird assumptions in a few words. 1) I never said you were obliged to not hate me, let alone love me. Hate me, fine. Enjoy it, for all I care. Avoid attibuting positions to me that don't apply. 2) Those are the options you see: either love or hate? You've got nothing in-between? Well, that partially explains all the bile. I'd be a cranky knob like you if I thought not hating someone entailed loving them.

Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:09 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 8:36 am

Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 7:00 am Who said anything about your posts being hard to follow? The pitbull is angry. The pitbull is trying to bite my leg.

As you said, you just hate.

For some reason you justify it, sometimes, as if it's hard to face that you...just hate.

So I'm obliged to love you? Fuck off.

You manage to pack of lot of weird assumptions in a few words. 1) I never said you were obliged to not hate me, let alone love me. Hate me, fine. Enjoy it, for all I care. Avoid attibuting positions to me that don't apply. 2) Those are the options you see: either love or hate? You've got nothing in-between? Well, that partially explains all the bile. I'd be a cranky knob like you if I thought not hating someone entailed loving them.

Wow. So personal. You get so personal when you can't answer. What a nasty little c***you are.

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:54 am Wow. So personal. You get so personal when you can't answer. What a nasty little c***you are.

If only you could see how you behave...

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:54 am

Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:09 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 8:36 am

So I'm obliged to love you? Fuck off.

You manage to pack of lot of weird assumptions in a few words. 1) I never said you were obliged to not hate me, let alone love me. Hate me, fine. Enjoy it, for all I care. Avoid attibuting positions to me that don't apply. 2) Those are the options you see: either love or hate? You've got nothing in-between? Well, that partially explains all the bile. I'd be a cranky knob like you if I thought not hating someone entailed loving them.

Wow. So personal. You get so personal when you can't answer. What a nasty little c***you are.

I answered your idiotic question:

So I'm obliged to love you?

It's right in there in what you quote.
It might help if you actually read posts you 'respond' to.

"This is a DUDE u can see that, right?"

Lol holy shit if i hadn't read the text and just scrolled past the image Id'a kept thinking that was homegirl who played harley quinn wtf.

That is a dude. Omg i feel violated and betrayed by nature and the laws of physics please don't post stuff like that u guys.

promethean75 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 3:18 pm "This is a DUDE u can see that, right?"

Lol holy shit if i hadn't read the text and just scrolled past the image Id'a kept thinking that was homegirl who played harley quinn wtf.

That is a dude. Omg i feel violated and betrayed by nature and the laws of physics please don't post stuff like that u guys.

There remain so many to transvestigate...

Men are arseholes

The continuing transvestigations of Accelafine snag another manly-womanly-manwoman

How thick are these men exactlY? Can anyone work out what stinkyunderpants' point is?

Accelafine's other Twitter acct has uncovered yet another transpiracy

It's very strange. Stinkyunderpants keeps posting photos of women because he seems to think it's some kind of 'gotcha' of 'what'??

I'm genuinely confused.

Man competes in women's boxing. Women are upset. Photos of women doing a variety of jobs, posted by stinky, apparently proves that it's ok for men to compete against women in boxing and that women should just suck it up because men like stinky enjoy watching them get punched in the face by men.

Hmm. Still not making sense.

Here's something to keep you going for a bit. Male olympic boxer punched female boxer in the back of the head (I believe that's illegal) so hard that her throat is pushed against the ropes. I understand he did this three times.

'For some reason' (I can't think what) the IOC has ordered the video to be taken down. Hmm. Now why would it do that? Why is it censoring only the fights between men and women?