Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:56 pm
I'm not sure Hobbes would agree with you.henry quirk wrote:Harbal,
I laughed cuz you made a funny.
Keep doin' that...not enough of that in this place.
Philosophy Now Forum
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Page 14 of 16
Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2015 11:58 pm
Hobbes, say it ain't so!
Re:
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 12:05 am
Depends.henry quirk wrote:Hobbes, say it ain't so!
If Harbal makes a funny and derails an interesting discussion then fuck that. I think he does it to cover his lack of understanding.
But I like a joke.
Re: Re:
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:57 am
It's more to do with uncovering.Hobbes' Choice wrote:
If Harbal makes a funny and derails an interesting discussion then fuck that. I think he does it to cover his lack of understanding.
.
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:29 pm
Where did Moyo run off to?
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:49 pm
Identity is not a particularly difficult concept to grasp so maybe he's satisfied with the answers he's received to his questions.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Where did Moyo run off to?
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:27 pm
I've gone as well but you're obviously pretending not to have noticed.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Where did Moyo run off to?
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 11:07 pm
Who said that?Harbal wrote:I've gone as well but you're obviously pretending not to have noticed.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Where did Moyo run off to?
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 8:46 am
I'm back for a bit...
I've never met people as slight headed as those on this forum. 1 divided by zero not included.
This is what i did.
I twisted the flow of this debate so that "being the mindless ..*things* that you are" , you ended up saying what i was saying and i ended up saying what you were saying.
And you didnt even notice...
Thats when i realised that i'm wasting my time here.
I've never met people as slight headed as those on this forum. 1 divided by zero not included.
This is what i did.
I twisted the flow of this debate so that "being the mindless ..*things* that you are" , you ended up saying what i was saying and i ended up saying what you were saying.
And you didnt even notice...
Thats when i realised that i'm wasting my time here.
because it remains an inescapable fact that all our observations of the external world are exclusively a construction of our own minds.
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 9:41 am
Heres the whole thing:
Obvious Leo wrote:I think Moyo is trying to have his cake and eat it too because the human consciousness is the loneliest place in the entire universe. We might imagine that an inter-subjective agreement on the identity of an "object" represents some sort of transcendent "truth" but this notion is illusory. If anything our facility in the use of language to codify and homogenise our inter-subjective agreements does nothing more than reinforce this illusion because it remains an inescapable fact that all our observations of the external world are exclusively a construction of our own minds. Plato was full of shit because humans are pattern-makers and NOT pattern-discoverers, although I guess Plato can be forgiven for not having the benefit of modern cognitive neuroscience.
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 11:30 am
Why did you come back?
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 2:45 pm
Who cares?Moyo wrote:I'm back for a bit...
And yet here you are?I've never met people as slight headed as those on this forum. 1 divided by zero not included.
Actually what I noticed is that you avoided discussing many of the objections to your thought. I also notice that you've not so far lived up to your promises nor proved yourself the genius you claim.This is what i did.
I twisted the flow of this debate so that "being the mindless ..*things* that you are" , you ended up saying what i was saying and i ended up saying what you were saying.
And you didnt even notice...
And yet here you are? Why do you write your feelings as who cares about such things upon a philosophy forum?Thats when i realised that i'm wasting my time here.
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 6:19 am
As an addition to all current field axioms
"For every A in S there exists a z1 and a z2 constituting A, such that any A in operation of multiplication or division is only representing z1 or z2 in any given equation. Such that z1 for all A's other than zero equal A. Such that z2 for all A's other than zero equal A. Such that z1 for zero equals 0. Such that z2 for zero equals 1."
"For every A in S there exists a z1 and a z2 constituting A, such that any A in operation of multiplication or division is only representing z1 or z2 in any given equation. Such that z1 for all A's other than zero equal A. Such that z2 for all A's other than zero equal A. Such that z1 for zero equals 0. Such that z2 for zero equals 1."
Re: Re:
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 6:52 am
How did I miss this lol!Hobbes' Choice wrote:Depends.henry quirk wrote:Hobbes, say it ain't so!
If Harbal makes a funny and derails an interesting discussion then fuck that. I think he does it to cover his lack of understanding.
But I like a joke.
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 1:36 pm
Only on Thursdays.conway wrote:As an addition to all current field axioms
"For every A in S there exists a z1 and a z2 constituting A, such that any A in operation of multiplication or division is only representing z1 or z2 in any given equation. Such that z1 for all A's other than zero equal A. Such that z2 for all A's other than zero equal A. Such that z1 for zero equals 0. Such that z2 for zero equals 1."