For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Bullshit, plain and simple!Arising_uk wrote:No, they can't. They are held in the houses and guarded.bobevenson wrote:They're not slaves, they can run to the police. As far as sex-trafficking, what's wrong with it, it's a business.
You'd know this how?bobevenson wrote:Bullshit, plain and simple!
Give me a single instance of this ever happening. It fails the logic test, which coming from you doesn't surprise me.Arising_uk wrote:You'd know this how?bobevenson wrote:Bullshit, plain and simple!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/ ... sex-slavesbobevenson wrote:Give me a single instance of this ever happening. It fails the logic test, which coming from you doesn't surprise me.
The fact that you were able to be so proficient sexually your first time suggest you were of an age to understand what you had access to.The Voice of Time wrote:http://edition.cnn.com/2013/02/15/tech/ ... an-icelandA member of the parliament committee studying the issue, Jonsdottir says a porn ban has "near zero" chance of passing parliament and that she's working to find other ways the government can help protect children from Web porn.
Seems like it's just a few people with big mouths and chastised panties. I don't know how my life would've turned out if I'd never discovered porn at a young age ^^ horrible for certain. Porn has kept me up-spirited for so many times, and taught me so much about the human nature of exploring anything, even with your tongueif anything, porn has been my main source of feeling secure about myself. The first (and only time, though read: to be continued) I had sex I brought my girl to 3 orgasms in a row with perfect execution. How dumb and insecure wouldn't I be if I'd not had all those movies to learn about female anatomy and sexuality?
I'm talking about the USA, dumbfuck, not oppressive England!Arising_uk wrote:http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/ ... sex-slavesbobevenson wrote:Give me a single instance of this ever happening. It fails the logic test, which coming from you doesn't surprise me.
Just one of thousands. Now shut the fuck-up about things you know nothing about.
Turd.bobevenson wrote:Who cares where there is sex-trafficking, ...
No, it is you, England and Europe who are the turds of the world, or shall I say the diarrhea of the world!Arising_uk wrote:Turd.bobevenson wrote:Who cares where there is sex-trafficking, ...
Say what you like boob, its all pretty much shit from you.bobevenson wrote:No, it is you, England and Europe who are the turds of the world, or shall I say the diarrhea of the world!
funny I thought it was protecting the rights and freedoms of those people who do not want their children exposed to pornography, and certainly not at the expense of denying their children the use of the vast majority of those who understand the degradation involved in MOST expressions of pornography and thus the universal attempt to censor it.chaz wyman wrote:It's called democracy Boob.bobevenson wrote:The problem is oppressive government.Kayla wrote:are there some malpheasants going around iceland forcing people to watch violent internet porn against their will
if not what is the problem here
Ask Rick Santorum and Mit Romney all about it.
Bob if you're referring to sex slavery, then you seem to have you head up your ass. Or would you rather a militia come pay you a visit to take you away and force you into Benny Boy hood.bobevenson wrote:They're not slaves, they can run to the police. As far as sex-trafficking, what's wrong with it, it's a business.Arising_uk wrote:On the basis that they tell the girls that they're going to be smuggled to the 'West' to work in normal jobs, they then beat and gang rape them, remove their passports, and keep them held in houses where they then prostitute them for profit. What would you call it? The euphemism over here is 'sex-trafficking'.bobevenson wrote:On what basis, pray tell, is this slavery?
Kayla wrote:are there some malpheasants going around iceland forcing people to watch violent internet porn against their will, if not what is the problem here
Yes, people have the right to ensure their children are not subjected to that which they feel they shouldn't, whatever that may be, and it's their responsibility alone, to do so. No one should expect the world to be their babysitter, because they're too lame to do so themselves. Freedom demands that everyone take care of their own, to the extent that their particular life choice dictates. No one is responsible for your decisions, but you.james1951 wrote:funny I thought it was protecting the rights and freedoms of those people who do not want their children exposed to pornography, and certainly not at the expense of denying their children the use of the vast majority of those who understand the degradation involved in MOST expressions of pornography and thus the universal attempt to censor it.chaz wyman wrote:It's called democracy Boob.bobevenson wrote:The problem is oppressive government.
Ask Rick Santorum and Mit Romney all about it.
You have demonstrated beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are a prime example of, and truly represent, oppressive European thinking, where government trumps human rights!Arising_uk wrote:Say what you like boob, its all pretty much shit from you.bobevenson wrote:No, it is you, England and Europe who are the turds of the world, or shall I say the diarrhea of the world!
That you think the sex-trafficking I described is okay as its free-market capitalism, ignoring that its against the girls will, just shows that you're also a misogynistic childless turd.