Corporation Socialism

How should society be organised, if at all?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Will Bouwman
Posts: 1334
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 2:17 pm

Re: Corporation Socialism

Post by Will Bouwman »

Immanuel Can wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 6:14 pm
Will Bouwman wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 5:20 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 4:06 pmYou're not paying attention. You're so focussed on "trolling" for what you perceive, I suppose, to be some kind of "win"...
That boat has sailed. Your assertion that the EU Commission is unaccountable is demonstrably not true.
You're being very, very silly again. I never said "unaccountable." I said "undemocratic," which it demonstrably is.
Immanuel Can wrote: Mon Dec 16, 2024 3:27 pmI said, "unelected," "unaccountable" and "ideologues," which would be the precise descriptors.
promethean75
Posts: 7113
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:29 pm

Re: Corporation Socialism

Post by promethean75 »

"Getting a girlfriend might be opportune at this juncture?"

Getting a girlfriend is opportune at any juncture.

At every moment, one is at some juncture. Ergo, a girlfriend is opportune at every moment.

Your statement is a general truism and, therefore, redundant at this juncture.
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 27604
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Corporation Socialism

Post by Immanuel Can »

Will Bouwman wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 8:37 am
No longer interested. Cavilling in this way is puerile and boring. I've got better things to do.
Will Bouwman
Posts: 1334
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 2:17 pm

Re: Corporation Socialism

Post by Will Bouwman »

Immanuel Can wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 3:45 pm
Will Bouwman wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 8:37 am
No longer interested. Cavilling in this way is puerile and boring. I've got better things to do.
One might be to apologise for this:
Will Bouwman wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 8:37 amYou're being very, very silly again. I never said "unaccountable." I said "undemocratic," which it demonstrably is.
When it is demonstrably not "very, very silly".
Immanuel Can wrote: Mon Dec 16, 2024 3:27 pmI said, "unelected," "unaccountable" and "ideologues," which would be the precise descriptors.
You won't apologise though, because you are pathologically incapable of admitting to yourself what everyone but yourself can clearly see: you were wrong.
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 8815
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: Corporation Socialism

Post by FlashDangerpants »

Immanuel Can wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 3:45 pm
Will Bouwman wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 8:37 am
No longer interested. Cavilling in this way is puerile and boring. I've got better things to do.
It sure looks like you did say "unaccountable." and that when the receipts were issued to prove it you lacked the humility needed to accept an error. Hardly a unique event, some might even consider it more of a trait.
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 27604
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Corporation Socialism

Post by Immanuel Can »

Will Bouwman wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 3:56 pm
Still not interested. Does nothing to advance the actual topic.

But "unaccountable" is completely warranted. No EU Commissioner is ever accountable to the people about whom he is making the decisions. And you know it. So there's no point in arguing with you.

Your argument would make out that Goebbels was "accountable" to Jews, because he had to answer to Hitler. :shock: Bob has NO SAY, and yet you suggest that's "accountability"? :shock:
Will Bouwman
Posts: 1334
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 2:17 pm

Re: Corporation Socialism

Post by Will Bouwman »

Immanuel Can wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 6:01 pm
Will Bouwman wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 3:56 pm
Still not interested. Does nothing to advance the actual topic.

But "unaccountable" is completely warranted. No EU Commissioner is ever accountable to the people about whom he is making the decisions. And you know it. So there's no point in arguing with you.

Your argument would make out that Goebbels was "accountable" to Jews, because he had to answer to Hitler. :shock: Bob has NO SAY, and yet you suggest that's "accountability"? :shock:
Well, if you knew your history, not to mention how the EU actually works, you would realise what a poor analogy that is. In the early 1930's, the Nazis, being the largest democratically elected party in the Reichstag, seized power and, until Germany was defeated in WWII, all subsequent German Parliamentary elections consisted of one question; variations on 'Do you approve of what we are doing?' Typical results were a 99% turnout, with 98% approval. Now, you clearly don't know much about democracies, but take it from me: those figures are suspiciously high. On top of that, all opposition parties were banned in 1933. So while Goebbels was accountable to Hitler, neither of them was accountable to the electorate.
In contrast, Bob has a vote that counts as much as anyone else's which he can cast for the party he believes will best represent his interests and/or the leader of which he believed would have best represented his interests in the European Council. Among the duties of the Council is the selection of EU Commissioners. Were Bob not happy with the Commissioners chosen by the Council, he could, in future election rounds, have voted for a candidate for a party, the leader of which Bob believed would select commissioners he did approve of.
In addition, Bob had the opportunity to vote for a member of the European Parliament who, in light of the many times I have pointed it out, you will be aware has to ratify the Selection of EU Commissioners by the European Council, and can, if they feel pressed to do so, dissolve the European Commission and demand a new one. Again, if Bob were not happy with the performance of his MEP, he had the opportunity in the next election cycle to vote for a candidate he preferred. The thing with election cycles is they come round when they come round and until they do, short of lobbying, protest and revolution, every constituent is as powerless as poor Bob.
There are different versions of democracy, none of which can ever please everybody all of the time, but again, as Winston Churchill said: “Democracy is the worst form of government – except for all the others that have been tried.”
Anyway, don't worry about apologising; I know you would rather have a limb removed.
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 27604
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Corporation Socialism

Post by Immanuel Can »

Will Bouwman wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 8:31 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 6:01 pm
Will Bouwman wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 3:56 pm
Still not interested. Does nothing to advance the actual topic.

But "unaccountable" is completely warranted. No EU Commissioner is ever accountable to the people about whom he is making the decisions. And you know it. So there's no point in arguing with you.

Your argument would make out that Goebbels was "accountable" to Jews, because he had to answer to Hitler. :shock: Bob has NO SAY, and yet you suggest that's "accountability"? :shock:
Well, if you knew your history,
I do.
...you would realise what a poor analogy that is.
Bob has no power to influence the EU Kommisar. The Jews had no power to influence Hitler. The EU and Hitler got to make autocratic decisions to the detriment of the people they controlled. So for the purpose of representing your logic, it's quite good, actually. You seem to think "democratic" can mean that Bob has no power, but since somebody else has power (i.e. the EU) that the Kommisar is democratically accountable.

So it captures your logic very well.
mickthinks
Posts: 1816
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 1:10 am
Location: Augsburg

Re: Corporation Socialism

Post by mickthinks »

Immanuel Can wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 6:01 pmDoes nothing to advance the actual topic.
Do you know what doesn’t advance the topic? Someone who can’t admit their mistake and tells a lie to cover up.

Philosophy requires a total commitment to intellectual honesty.

You are not honest, Manny. You don’t belong here.
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 27604
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Corporation Socialism

Post by Immanuel Can »

mickthinks wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 9:09 pm Manny. You don’t belong here.
:D I'll take your preferences into consideration, and give them all the consideration they deserve.
Will Bouwman
Posts: 1334
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 2:17 pm

Re: Corporation Socialism

Post by Will Bouwman »

Immanuel Can wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 8:50 pmThe EU and Hitler got to make autocratic decisions to the detriment of the people they controlled.
Do you have a vision of democracy in which decisions are made to the detriment of nobody?
Gary Childress
Posts: 11748
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
Location: It's my fault

Re: Corporation Socialism

Post by Gary Childress »

Immanuel Can wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 9:14 pm
mickthinks wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 9:09 pm Manny. You don’t belong here.
:D I'll take your preferences into consideration, and give them all the consideration they deserve.
It appears that you were incorrect about not using the word "unaccountable". We're all wrong sometimes. Being wrong is not the end of the world. I can say that from personal experience.
Gary Childress
Posts: 11748
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
Location: It's my fault

Re: Corporation Socialism

Post by Gary Childress »

Immanuel Can wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 6:01 pm
Will Bouwman wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 3:56 pm
Still not interested. Does nothing to advance the actual topic.

But "unaccountable" is completely warranted. No EU Commissioner is ever accountable to the people about whom he is making the decisions. And you know it. So there's no point in arguing with you.

Your argument would make out that Goebbels was "accountable" to Jews, because he had to answer to Hitler. :shock: Bob has NO SAY, and yet you suggest that's "accountability"? :shock:
At least EU officials are either elected officials or people who report to elected officials aren't they?

In the US we have similar problems as far as representation. Even with elected representatives, those who didn't vote for the representatives that win the elections are arguably not represented by the representatives who win. It's a classical problem for non-direct democracies for sure but it seems more democratic than Russia or China are. Does the EU repress political adversaries of their elected representatives?
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 27604
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Corporation Socialism

Post by Immanuel Can »

Will Bouwman wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 9:44 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 8:50 pmThe EU and Hitler got to make autocratic decisions to the detriment of the people they controlled.
Do you have a vision of democracy in which decisions are made to the detriment of nobody?
No, of course. What silly questions you ask!
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 27604
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Corporation Socialism

Post by Immanuel Can »

Gary Childress wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 10:59 pm At least EU officials are either elected officials or people who report to elected officials aren't they?
No. The Commissioners, or Kommisars, which is the better name for them, are unelected bureaucrats. Their only accountability is to the EU, not to England, and not to Bob. And they make all the decisions.

You'll find that even the Leftist press notes that fact. I posted a link about that, earlier.
Post Reply