Trump
-
promethean75
- Posts: 7113
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:29 pm
Re: Trump
"sex offenders have been selected as the new realization of moral panics about sex, stranger danger, and national paranoia, the new folk devils or boogeymen. People convicted of any sex crime are "transformed into a concept of evil, which is then personified as a group of faceless, terrifying, and predatory devils", who are, contrary to scientific evidence, perceived as a constant threat, habitually waiting for an opportunity to attack."
BOO!
BOO!
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 8815
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: Trump
Look at what Immanuel Can writes about the relationship between religion and morality and you can't help but see something there isn't quite right, yeah? You see it too, I know you do. There's something in his testimony that accidentally lets on that he has some sort of urge that he restrains by thinking about God a lot. He thinks it's universal, he doesn't understand why Harbal finds it a bit disturbing to be told that he would need faith before he could actually not want to do murders.promethean75 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 30, 2024 12:30 pm If they make u look like a duck, swim like a duck and quack like a duck, then be a duck, i always say.
Some people think IC's deal is something in the violence spectrum and that if we broke his faith in God he might kill his own family with an axe. I think it's more likely that the urges he restrains are sexual and he would absolutely go to town on a dick if his relgion fell away. He would suck that thing till it was the size of a pea. But IC doesn't think there's anything revealing in what he writes, he thinks he makes perfect sense.
That's sort of how it goes for stuff like "He's too much of a p*ssy to rape someone" and "he forced himself on carroll, she wiggled out of it, and then exaggerated". To other people those phrases aren't really the throwaways you seem to think they are.
-
promethean75
- Posts: 7113
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:29 pm
Re: Trump
Sometimes u can read too much into things and find implicit meanings that end up revealing what u, yourself, would be guilty of if u were the person you're analyzing. Example: IC may be gay becuz his christian zealotry means this and this.
This could mean, instead: if i were a christian zealot, it would be becuz I may be tryna supress gay and/or homicidal fantasies, so i assume any other christian zealot is doing the same.
(Btw, careful with that axe, IC)
This is why implicit analysis like that is so risky. One imports they're own reasons (why they would if they were him) into the psychoanalytic theory that's attempting to explain the motivations behind a behavior. Like your homeboy freud and his penis envy complex stuff. Sure, it may be the case that homegirl is jealous becuz she doesn't have a johnson... but it may also be the case that she isn't jealous, and you're just admitting a confession that you'd be jealous for such reasons if u were homegirl, yourself.
....
That Don T is too much of a p*ssy to rape someone doesn't necessarily translate to 'not being a p*ssy is a good thing. Raping someone means you're not a p*ssy. Therefore, u should rape someone.' There are many other ways to not be a p*ssy.
Also, would u deny that a great many women have grossly exaggerated the nature of sexual offenses against them (or outright lied) to garner attention and favor from other people? Shirley not.
This could mean, instead: if i were a christian zealot, it would be becuz I may be tryna supress gay and/or homicidal fantasies, so i assume any other christian zealot is doing the same.
(Btw, careful with that axe, IC)
This is why implicit analysis like that is so risky. One imports they're own reasons (why they would if they were him) into the psychoanalytic theory that's attempting to explain the motivations behind a behavior. Like your homeboy freud and his penis envy complex stuff. Sure, it may be the case that homegirl is jealous becuz she doesn't have a johnson... but it may also be the case that she isn't jealous, and you're just admitting a confession that you'd be jealous for such reasons if u were homegirl, yourself.
....
That Don T is too much of a p*ssy to rape someone doesn't necessarily translate to 'not being a p*ssy is a good thing. Raping someone means you're not a p*ssy. Therefore, u should rape someone.' There are many other ways to not be a p*ssy.
Also, would u deny that a great many women have grossly exaggerated the nature of sexual offenses against them (or outright lied) to garner attention and favor from other people? Shirley not.
Re: Trump
Ohh.... Y-yeah, r-right! That's what I...meant.commonsense wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:00 pmYou must mean 2nd term, because more than that is prohibited by Amendment 22 of the United States Constitution. If you adhere to the law of the land, then you must admit that Trump is campaigning for his 2nd term. And by so doing, you must understand that the 2020 Presidential election was not stolen.
Re: Trump
C'mon...prom, don't tell me you don't sympathize with this nonsense, unjust Prosecution.promethean75 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:31 pm "a lot of folks have been screwed by corruption of the system just as Trump is being screwed ... wouldn't you agree?"
Not hardly. The majority of those who will vote for Trump, which are bible thumpin working class, would benefit more if they voted democrat. The minority, big business owners and the like, do better to vote for trump.
Even tho the majority still get fucked by the democrats (who are pro-capitalism), they don't get fucked as hard. It's the lesser of two evils.
It's completely bogus. I'm sure you can relate!?
Re: Trump
They call this, Women’s Rights. The laughter is just ostensible cover, but it does fit the name. The name that Trump used to summon the proof.promethean75 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:48 pm Oh and useless old haute bourgeois carol got enough money to keep her whole family from having to work for at least three generations.
Grandkids: Grandma Carol, what's the best thing that ever happened to us?
Carol: when trump called me a bitch.
Women’s Rights
https://twitter.com/i/status/1752160799139807536
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 8815
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: Habba
Here's a real lawyer explaining exactly how badly Habba fucked up that trial.Walker wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:51 pmYou do realize that because you think such an accomplished, strong woman needs the endorsement of any random man, then you are a misogynist. Couldn’t be simpler.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:27 pmHoly shit Walker, your endorsement really is the kiss of death.Walker wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 8:21 am Now, this is an impressive woman.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAxWVAOGwfY
Passion, intelligence, beauty, strength, fired-up ... for real entertaining.
Will you atone for your blatant anti-wokeness to appease PC, or will the choiceless path be to yet again rationalize your way out of the obvious?
Trump’s Worst Lawyer Costs Him Millions (Carroll v. Trump)
By minute 8 the judge has had to explain in great detail how to enter a document into evidence so that you are allowed to ask the witness questions about it.... because she doesn't know how to be a lawyer at all.
Next up there's the mistake of allowing Trump into the court room where his verbal incontinence exacerbated the situation.
Then there's getting caught blatantly faking Covid to get the day off.
Then she didn't understand the concept of collateral estoppel and just attempted to re-litigate a case already lost, which is definitely something she ought to know if she wants to be a lawyer (she will be disbarred soon though so it's probably a waste of time for her to bother now)
Then she fails to understand the rules of evidence so badly that the judge threatened her with jail for contempt.
Then she told teh jury that the rape victim should be glad she was raped because now she has more fame, money and social media followers. How many millions do you reckon that one stupid statement cost her employer?
And they didn't present any experts to drive the cost down because she bet the farm on an effort to re-litigate the first trial in apparent ignorance of the estoppel rule that disallows this entirely.
And finally there's the basic failure to properly object to any evidence. She doesn't seem to have preserved any worthwhile record for an appeal even if they were to make the mistake of actually appealing.
Habba is toast, let her "voluntarily" hand back her law license in 12 months or so and then become one of the talking heads on Fox until she is forgotten. I hear you far-right types have developed quite a thing for Taylor Swift recently, and while I find her music irritating, I cannot deny that she is talented at least which Habba is not. So there you go, that's your new strong female role model. Go Tay-Tay
-
promethean75
- Posts: 7113
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:29 pm
Re: Trump
Yeah but 83 million is trump change. What's more important is keeping an entourage of hot women around u so other men will respect and envy u.
-
commonsense
- Posts: 5380
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm
Re: Trump
If he’s not guilty of any wrongdoing, why does he want to delay?
However, in any case he should be allowed on every ballot because he’s not unqualified to run for president. He’s just disqualified from holding office. If he wins the election but cannot serve, just inaugurate the runner-up.
However, in any case he should be allowed on every ballot because he’s not unqualified to run for president. He’s just disqualified from holding office. If he wins the election but cannot serve, just inaugurate the runner-up.
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11750
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Trump
You don't need to take it that hard. If what you have related to us is true (or what I've seen of it), then you've probably paid your dues to society and maybe then some. Hopefully, you've learned from it and will not make the same mistake again. You're being honest.promethean75 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 30, 2024 12:30 pm If they make u look like a duck, swim like a duck and quack like a duck, then be a duck, i always say.
I recused myself in jury duty the last time I was selected because the trial was for a guy who was driving recklessly and refused to take a breathalyzer when pulled over. I could tell from looking at the smug smile on the guy's and his lawyer's faces and from the way the questioning proceeded during jury selection that he was probably guilty and simply hiding behind legal loopholes. When I was younger I did some irresponsible driving too concerning alcohol but wasn't caught for doing it, so I confessed to it during the jury selection process. Needless to say, I wasn't picked. I don't feel bad about being honest in a situation like that. I feel like I did the right thing.
-
promethean75
- Posts: 7113
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:29 pm
Re: Trump
"Hopefully, you've learned from it and will not make the same mistake again."
This statement should be directed toward the state, not me.
When i commited that crime in 2010, i was fully aware of the risks and regret nothing about it. What i did not expect, however, was to be charged and convicted of crimes i did not commit instead of the crime i did commit.
There is no 'lesson' to learn here other than that the state is full of shit. The real question here is: how might the state learn its lesson and stop convicting people of crimes they are not guilty of.
But it gets worse. There is no 'state', just individuals full of varying degrees of shit who comprise the state judicial system. So, suppose i started offing judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys and cops becuz of what happened to me. Do u think that would change anything? Shirley not. The same nonsense would continue after what i did was over and i was gone. That's the problem. There is no single arbiter of injustice that could be targeted and corrected. After the scumbags that hold office in the judicial system retire, a new batch of scumbags take their place.
All that being the case, if one were to try and locate the cause of all this mess, one would end up either at 'god' or nature, but not any one of the scumbags that comprise the judicial system as there is no freewill. They are not responsible for, and can be nothing other than, the scumbags that they are.
As u can see, G, this is some pretty serious shit we're in.
This statement should be directed toward the state, not me.
When i commited that crime in 2010, i was fully aware of the risks and regret nothing about it. What i did not expect, however, was to be charged and convicted of crimes i did not commit instead of the crime i did commit.
There is no 'lesson' to learn here other than that the state is full of shit. The real question here is: how might the state learn its lesson and stop convicting people of crimes they are not guilty of.
But it gets worse. There is no 'state', just individuals full of varying degrees of shit who comprise the state judicial system. So, suppose i started offing judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys and cops becuz of what happened to me. Do u think that would change anything? Shirley not. The same nonsense would continue after what i did was over and i was gone. That's the problem. There is no single arbiter of injustice that could be targeted and corrected. After the scumbags that hold office in the judicial system retire, a new batch of scumbags take their place.
All that being the case, if one were to try and locate the cause of all this mess, one would end up either at 'god' or nature, but not any one of the scumbags that comprise the judicial system as there is no freewill. They are not responsible for, and can be nothing other than, the scumbags that they are.
As u can see, G, this is some pretty serious shit we're in.
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11750
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Trump
OK. I apologize. I don't know the full story. I probably shouldn't have said anything about it.promethean75 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2024 3:49 pm "Hopefully, you've learned from it and will not make the same mistake again."
This statement should be directed toward the state, not me.
-
promethean75
- Posts: 7113
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:29 pm
Re: Trump
Naw you're good, haus. No offense taken.
In fact, a man with any sense who has passed through the criminal justice system should want to amp up his criminal nature once he's seen what goes down in there. Reverence for the law is the last thing a man with his wits about him would feel.
Instead of regret and 'learning from his mistakes', a fella should be so appalled by this system that his only regret would be 'why didn't i become a criminal sooner, and a better criminal, at that.'
In fact, a man with any sense who has passed through the criminal justice system should want to amp up his criminal nature once he's seen what goes down in there. Reverence for the law is the last thing a man with his wits about him would feel.
Instead of regret and 'learning from his mistakes', a fella should be so appalled by this system that his only regret would be 'why didn't i become a criminal sooner, and a better criminal, at that.'
Re: Trump
I don't see how you can just ignore The System coming down upon Trump, hitting him with what 100 million lawsuit for saying the crazy woman who said he raped her, is crazy, and all the other bullshit...and feel absolutely no comradery???promethean75 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 11, 2024 11:01 am Naw you're good, haus. No offense taken.
In fact, a man with any sense who has passed through the criminal justice system should want to amp up his criminal nature once he's seen what goes down in there. Reverence for the law is the last thing a man with his wits about him would feel.
Instead of regret and 'learning from his mistakes', a fella should be so appalled by this system that his only regret would be 'why didn't i become a criminal sooner, and a better criminal, at that.'
What's up with that, prom? I thought there was 'Honor Among Thieves', or some shit?? Not so much, I guess.
