The Democrat Party Hates America

[Gary Childress]

Of course. That's the war we were talking about.

Putin.

Putin's a psycho. But Biden's handlers knew that. NATO has now admitted to provoking the psycho to invade, and Biden's announced his plans to perpetuate that war indefinitely, to the point of "regime change."

Now, imagine what it means when you tell a psycho, and one with nuclear weapons, that your plan is to provoke a regime-change war with him? That's what the Democrats have done.

Unless I'm mistaken, Noam Chomsky has apparently had dialog with Putin since the war started. According to Chomsky, Putin is sane. Putin is fighting a war and he's a sane man. If that's the case, then what is his excuse for fighting a war?

[mickthinks]

Now, imagine what it means when you tell a psycho, and one with nuclear weapons, ...

Have you noticed how the right likes to threaten the left with other countries' weapons?

[FlashDangerpants]

NATO has now publicly admitted that their insistence on expanding to Ukraine has precipitated the Ukraine war.

I missed that news item. Who exactly said what?

It's what IC believes.

I'm just asking for the fact of the matter. If NATO has publicly admitted responsibility for a war, it should be news.

I'm not seeing it on the BBC site, or The Hill, or Politico, or the Independent. The big news about NATO today seems to be a matter of whether Turkey and Hungary are ready to ratify Sweden's bid. The other thing seems like a bigger deal than that.

So as we know, IC wouldn't make it up.... he literally couldn't make it up... He said that himself

You can't make this stuff up.

So where is the information relating to this whole shocking news to be found?

[Gary Childress]

I missed that news item. Who exactly said what?

It's what IC believes.

I'm just asking for the fact of the matter. If NATO has publicly admitted responsibility for a war, it should be news.

I'm not seeing it on the BBC site, or The Hill, or Politico, or the Independent. The big news about NATO today seems to be a matter of whether Turkey and Hungary are ready to ratify Sweden's bid. The other thing seems like a bigger deal than that.

So as we know, IC wouldn't make it up.... he literally couldn't make it up... He said that himself

You can't make this stuff up.

So where is the information relating to this whole shocking news to be found?

Can I throw in my guess before he answers? I'm going to say it WAS NOT from NATO.

[Gary Childress]

Now, imagine what it means when you tell a psycho, and one with nuclear weapons, ...

Have you noticed how the right likes to threaten the left with other countries' weapons?

He'd be so much better standing up for oppressed people on their behalf, wouldn't he? I mean people of color got tired of that when they realized that others speaking up for them were just looking for social credits and nothing else. At least according to dissidents on the right. It's not genuine compassion for people of color. IC on the other hand is a Saint because he believe in Jesus. Santa Clause is going to bring him a second wife soon.

[Immanuel Can]

Putin.

Putin's a psycho. But Biden's handlers knew that. NATO has now admitted to provoking the psycho to invade, and Biden's announced his plans to perpetuate that war indefinitely, to the point of "regime change."

Now, imagine what it means when you tell a psycho, and one with nuclear weapons, that your plan is to provoke a regime-change war with him? That's what the Democrats have done.

Unless I'm mistaken, Noam Chomsky has apparently had dialog with Putin since the war started. According to Chomsky, Putin is sane. Putin is fighting a war and he's a sane man. If that's the case, then what is his excuse for fighting a war?

I'm not saying making a mental diagnosis but a moral one. Putin's cunning, alright. But he's morally evil. But then, so are the people who've provoked this horrible war, when they knew that was what they were going to do, and then did it anyway. And it's Ukrainian and Russian blood that's being spilt on account of two groups of wicked people.

[FlashDangerpants]

It's what IC believes.

I'm just asking for the fact of the matter. If NATO has publicly admitted responsibility for a war, it should be news.

I'm not seeing it on the BBC site, or The Hill, or Politico, or the Independent. The big news about NATO today seems to be a matter of whether Turkey and Hungary are ready to ratify Sweden's bid. The other thing seems like a bigger deal than that.

So as we know, IC wouldn't make it up.... he literally couldn't make it up... He said that himself

You can't make this stuff up.

So where is the information relating to this whole shocking news to be found?

Can I throw in my guess before he answers? I'm going to say it WAS NOT from NATO.

He gave you the link already tbh. It is a guy from NATO, telling the European parliament that Putin demanded not only apromise not to expand NATO into Ukrain, but also to remove all NATO equipoment from the Baltics and Poland etc. It's a highly slanted think piece.

But the good news is that IC didn't make it up, some guy called Jeffrey fed him some Russian propaganda and IC ate it up.

[Immanuel Can]

Can I throw in my guess before he answers? I'm going to say it WAS NOT from NATO.

You guessed wrong. Check the article.

[Immanuel Can]

It is a guy from NATO...Russian propaganda...

You can't even think straight. If it was NATO, we can be reasonably sure it isn't "Russian propaganda," no matter how convenient it might be for you to pretend otherwise.

[Gary Childress]

Putin's a psycho. But Biden's handlers knew that. NATO has now admitted to provoking the psycho to invade, and Biden's announced his plans to perpetuate that war indefinitely, to the point of "regime change."

Now, imagine what it means when you tell a psycho, and one with nuclear weapons, that your plan is to provoke a regime-change war with him? That's what the Democrats have done.

Unless I'm mistaken, Noam Chomsky has apparently had dialog with Putin since the war started. According to Chomsky, Putin is sane. Putin is fighting a war and he's a sane man. If that's the case, then what is his excuse for fighting a war?

I'm not saying making a mental diagnosis but a moral one. Putin's cunning, alright. But he's morally evil. But then, so are the people who've provoked this horrible war, when they knew that was what they were going to do, and then did it anyway. And it's Ukrainian and Russian blood that's being spilt on account of two groups of wicked people.

When Chomsky refers to sane, he doesn't use it in the context of morality. He uses it in the context of being able to make moral distinctions but not necessarily doing so. It's the same way courts judge people. A person can be given clemency or whatever if they murdered someone because of insanity. However, if someone does something evil while sane, then they are fully aware of what they did.

[Gary Childress]

Can I throw in my guess before he answers? I'm going to say it WAS NOT from NATO.

You guessed wrong. Check the article.

What article are you talking about?

[Gary Childress]

Anyway, I've got more important concerns right now. I'll let you figure it out on your own IC.

[FlashDangerpants]

It is a guy from NATO...Russian propaganda...

You can't even think straight. If it was NATO, we can be reasonably sure it isn't "Russian propaganda," no matter how convenient it might be for you to pretend otherwise.

Just as you left out my reference to a heavily slanted think piece which is the context for my description of the work as propaganda, your source worked hard to impose a very implausible interpretation on the testimony that was placed before the European Parliament.

[Immanuel Can]

When Chomsky refers to sane, he doesn't use it in the context of morality.

Then that's Chomsky's problem. He should be pointing out how morally unbalanced Putin is. It's awfully obvious, given his career.

But those who provoked him knew that. They poked the psycho. And they're still doing it. And they're the Democrats.

[Gary Childress]

It is a guy from NATO...Russian propaganda...

You can't even think straight. If it was NATO, we can be reasonably sure it isn't "Russian propaganda," no matter how convenient it might be for you to pretend otherwise.

Just as you left out my reference to a heavily slanted think piece which is the context for my description of the work as propaganda, your source worked hard to impose a very implausible interpretation on the testimony that was placed before the European Parliament.

For starters, NATO is not ONE PERSON. ONE PERSON, cannot speak on behalf of other members of his or her organization, if that's what you're referring to.