Philosophy Now Forum

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: What is NDA?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-disclosure_agreement

Dal,

I truly don't give a flip what you do with your body, and nuthin' I've written in this thread sez otherwise.

But: what I absolutely will not do is pay for your self-mutillation or pretend your delusion is anything but a bit of disordered, diseased, thinking.

Lop off your cock, makes me no never mind, just stop demanding my tax dollars to do it, and stop demanding I respect your insanity as a kind of 'healthy alternative' or a 'celebration of diversity'.

Transgenderism is lunacy...wallow in it if you like...I refuse to wallow with you.

"Henry, when I compared you to a mad dog it wasn't to amuse you. You should at least have the decency to pretend to be offended."

But it did amuse me, didn't offend me, and I ain't decent, so...

henry quirk wrote:Dal,

I truly don't give a flip what you do with your body, and nuthin' I've written in this thread sez otherwise.

But: what I absolutely will not do is pay for your self-mutillation or pretend your delusion is anything but a bit of disordered, diseased, thinking.

Lop off your cock, makes me no never mind, just stop demanding my tax dollars to do it, and stop demanding I respect your insanity as a kind of 'healthy alternative' or a 'celebration of diversity'.

Transgenderism is lunacy...wallow in it if you like...I refuse to wallow with you.

Fuck you little boy. I don't want your tax dollars either. You don't even pay taxes in Canada, so shut your hole. I pay for others children, though I don't agree I should. Fuck, I pay for IVF, so people who can't normally have kids, can. Then pay for their education and health on top of that. In Canada, that is.

Hatred and ignorance is lunacy...wallow in it if you like...I refuse to wallow with you. And now think you are a worthless, sorry excuse of a human, who is passing his worthless, sorry opinions onto his nephew.

Now, you want to continue this, boy?

...eat Drano, pansy.

henry quirk wrote:...eat Drano, pansy.

Nice to see your real character, Henry. Clearly your issues are deeper than where your pittance of taxes are directed.

Only one I got...never pretended otherwise.

henry quirk wrote:Only one I got...never pretended otherwise.

Too bad. It's weak and fearful of differences. And excusing it as the only one you have does not make it somehow more noble for the fact of singularity.

And, for the record: I'm the guy who advocates 'mind your own business and keep your hands to yourself', but that's a street that runs both way...quit tellin' me 'fire is cold' and you can go off and burn yourself all you like.

Now, I'm goin' to the movies.

henry quirk wrote:And, for the record: I'm the guy who advocates 'mind your own business and keep your hands to yourself', but that's a street that runs both way...quit tellin' me 'fire is cold' and you can go off and burn yourself all you like.

Now, I'm goin' to the movies.

You have an opinion on me, by God I'll shove your shallow face in it, boy! Now go watch a macho movie, and feel better about your masculinity.

Dalek Prime wrote:Do me a favour; don't help me.

Was somebody trying to use an email forum to "help" you, in some way, DP? That would be silly. It's just a chat space. We're discussing a philosophical issue here, a matter of ethics and realism. That's all.

Meanwhile, nobody even mentioned your name, so far as I know. I certainly never did, and I have no idea of your personal inclinations -- nor a desire to prize them out of you.

Anyway, if you're not interested in discussing it, there's no one forcing you to do so, so far as I know. And if you do wish to discuss it, then you can. That's the limit of it, really.

Dalek Prime wrote: Do me a favour; don't help me. All I'm telling you as a person who has zero say or business in my adult affairs, is to stay out of them. Is that a difficulty, IC? Henry? Anyone else? And do not talk around me, when I am present on this thread. Address the only transgendered person on this thread.

If you do not feel you need to stay out of another adult's affairs, rest assured I will stick my nose in yours, and you best not hypocritically whine about it when I do.

You are asking kristians to stay out of others' private lives? Kristians have done nothing else but stick their snouts in people's private lives (mainly due to their sex obsession) for the past couple of millennia. They aren't about to stop now.

Hobbes' Choice wrote:
I agree there is a Jewish look. However Arthur Koerslers' thesis is that never never came from Palestine, but that the diaspora is mainly from the Empire of the Khazar's. Stuck between the Christians in the west and the Muslims to the east, the entire Khazar Empire converted to Judaism from the 8thC to the 10thC.

These guys are not Jews.

It's only his theory. There are so many bizarre conspiracy-type theories surrounding jews. I take no notice of any of them. As far as I've seen his 'theory' only gives the nutters more fuel. I'm not sure what those photos prove. They don't look much like Dustin Hoffman.

Immanuel Can wrote:

Dalek Prime wrote:Do me a favour; don't help me.

Was somebody trying to use an email forum to "help" you, in some way, DP? That would be silly. It's just a chat space. We're discussing a philosophical issue here, a matter of ethics and realism. That's all.

Meanwhile, nobody even mentioned your name, so far as I know. I certainly never did, and I have no idea of your personal inclinations -- nor a desire to prize them out of you.

Anyway, if you're not interested in discussing it, there's no one forcing you to do so, so far as I know. And if you do wish to discuss it, then you can. That's the limit of it, really.

Oh, how very kristian and empathetic of you.

uwot wrote:

Harbal wrote:

Immanuel Can wrote: For they want to preen themselves as "open-minded," "inclusive," and "generous of heart,"

You should take a good long look at yourself, Immanuel.

That's exactly what he is doing, Harbal. It's called projection, he can't deal with his own vanity, so he simply attributes it to others.

Yes, I noted that he accused me of was his own behaviour and so disorientingly unrelated to me that I had a touch of vertigo on first reading

There seems to be a connection between zealotlike religiosity and psychological projection. I don't get projection when I disagree with secularists. Maybe such theists failed to fully separate from mother and thus do not understand that they are truly separate human beings? Hence they feel justified in trying to control others. Thus they project - they don't quite comprehend that we are separate.

This weak sense of separation might also explain why fanatical theists have such obvious parent issues in their religion, with the anthropomorphic deity being a clear "father for the fathers".