Ok. Right. He's only universally accepted as one of the three greatest of the great. It's not a competition between them. They are three completely different composers, from different times. My own favourite happens to be Bach, but they all wrote sublime music. They were all geniuses.Hobbes' Choice wrote:No. It's all crap. Mozart is okay for children but its not very challenging to a mature ear.vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Ridiculous.Hobbes' Choice wrote: There is one massive example: his entire canon of work. Symphony 40 is quite nice, but really? It's all a bit chintzy.
Had he lived longer then maybe he's have written something worthwhile, but I'd not swap his entire cannon for Beethoven's first Symphony. Ludwig Van had real class.
You might not personally like Mozart's music, but that doesn't make it any less worthy.