The Philosophy Now Forum

Posted: **Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:15 am**

Dubious wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 12:11 am
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 12:01 am
Dubious wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2026 11:41 pm

I presume you concur with Trump's position that climate change is a hoax? Ja!
I'm not American. I have no reason to "concur" with anybody there. What I do know is that the so-called "green" measures in Canada are not "green." But they're hugely bad for the economy, as well. But that's just a matter of fact.
I didn't ask if you're American. That was not the question! I asked whether you believe climate change is a hoax.

And I put you back on the subject: Canada. The "green" measures the Liberals are advocating are not only ineffective, but actually environmentally damaging...and disastrous for the economy -- and for any prospect Canada might have of becoming more independent, since they're going to need massive revenues to replace what they're losing from the US, for sure.

Posted: **Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:23 am**

Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:15 am
Dubious wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 12:11 am
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 12:01 am
I'm not American. I have no reason to "concur" with anybody there. What I do know is that the so-called "green" measures in Canada are not "green." But they're hugely bad for the economy, as well. But that's just a matter of fact.
I didn't ask if you're American. That was not the question! I asked whether you believe climate change is a hoax.
And I put you back on the subject: Canada. The "green" measures the Liberals are advocating are not only ineffective, but actually environmentally damaging...and disastrous for the economy -- and for any prospect Canada might have of becoming more independent, since they're going to need massive revenues to replace what they're losing from the US, for sure.

So you can't even answer a simple question if climate change is real or not. What the Liberals are doing, effective or not, has nothing to do with the question!

Posted: **Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:28 am**

Dubious wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:23 am
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:15 am
Dubious wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 12:11 am
I didn't ask if you're American. That was not the question! I asked whether you believe climate change is a hoax.
And I put you back on the subject: Canada. The "green" measures the Liberals are advocating are not only ineffective, but actually environmentally damaging...and disastrous for the economy -- and for any prospect Canada might have of becoming more independent, since they're going to need massive revenues to replace what they're losing from the US, for sure.
So you can't even answer a simple question

I could have. But it was a dumb question. It had nothing to do with what I said.

Posted: **Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:43 am**

Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:28 am
Dubious wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:23 am
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:15 am
And I put you back on the subject: Canada. The "green" measures the Liberals are advocating are not only ineffective, but actually environmentally damaging...and disastrous for the economy -- and for any prospect Canada might have of becoming more independent, since they're going to need massive revenues to replace what they're losing from the US, for sure.
So you can't even answer a simple question
I could have. But it was a dumb question. It had nothing to do with what I said.

If you could have why not just answer the dumb question?

Posted: **Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:48 am**

Dubious wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:43 am
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:28 am
Dubious wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:23 am
So you can't even answer a simple question
I could have. But it was a dumb question. It had nothing to do with what I said.
If you could have why not just answer the dumb question?

Because I'm refusing to change the subject. That's why.

Posted: **Thu Oct 01, 2026 6:49 am**

Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:48 am Because I'm refusing to change the subject. That's why.

Oooh lookee! There’s Manny hoping we’ve forgotten that it was he who turned the discussion toward criticism of Carney’s and Canada’s environmental policies.

Manny is a slippery piece of … er, work, isn’t he?

Posted: **Thu Oct 01, 2026 11:41 am**

AI Overview

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government has significantly rolled back several major Trudeau-era climate and environmental policies, framing the shifts as a pragmatic response to economic pressures, energy security, and U.S. trade policies under President Donald Trump.

Posted: **Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:38 pm**

phyllo wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 11:41 am
AI Overview

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government has significantly rolled back several major Trudeau-era climate and environmental policies, framing the shifts as a pragmatic response to economic pressures, energy security, and U.S. trade policies under President Donald Trump.

Ah, yes...AI. What people turn to, when they have no idea themselves.

This is true, but not significant. These "significant roll backs" have upset his ideologically-possessed colleagues who are deep into the "green" nonsense. But so far, they're mostly talk and haven't changed the economic situation in key locales, like the West. The Libs are still blocking pipelines, and the silly dust-up between Carney and Trump has imperilled key Canadian exports.

Carney's throwing chicken feed to the crowd, hoping it looks enough like food. But he's scared of his own people, so he can only go so far.

Posted: **Thu Oct 01, 2026 4:44 pm**

Dubious wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:43 am If you could have why not just answer the dumb question?

I live to oblige your irrelevancies. Here's something that's bang on the level of your question.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DdCZRN0xWaH/

Posted: **Thu Oct 01, 2026 5:18 pm**

Dubious wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 1:23 am
So you can't even answer a simple question if climate change is real or not. What the Liberals are doing, effective or not, has nothing to do with the question!

The climate changes, of course.
The issue is if humans cause the climate to change.

The AI opinion on the matter is an amalgamation of popular opinion, unless it has already reached the threshold of all existing opinion, and is cybernetically venturing into the unknown as spokesmachine for humanity.

AI says that human activity is the main cause of climate change.

The main cause. Screwy.

A mere human, lesser Conclusion:
The human consensus that human activity is the main cause of climate change is obviously ridiculous, since climate has always changed, and without the help of humans as the main cause, in the past the climate has changed more quickly with only the earth's, the atmosphere's, and the sun's natural, lesser causes as the driving force of change, e.g., the onset of an ice age.

That doesn't add up.

Therefore, AI's opinion on the matter, which is the amalgamation of the human thought that AI can currently access as evidence, indicates that the brain-washing has been a success, and Mankind, at least in publication accessible to AI, thinks that the totality of humanity is indeed more powerful than the earth and the sky. Next to conquer and pollute ... the solar system, infinity, and beyond.

Next, it will tell us that humans are less than machines.

Posted: **Thu Oct 01, 2026 6:32 pm**

Walker wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 5:18 pm
AI s.... AI's ....AI

Such disloyalty to your Dear Leader. Don't you know he issued an executive order renaming AI to ‘super intelligence’

Demonstrate your loyalty now bitch, call it SI.

Posted: **Fri Oct 02, 2026 4:25 am**

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2026 6:32 pm

Flash is just a pretend thug, frustrated by being perpetually wrong.

Uh huh.

The Don probably wanted to rename AI to MAGA, or Trump, but decided not to out of genuine compassion for those made fragile and defensively thuggish by the intellectually debilitating affliction known as … TDS.

https://cdn.patriotpost.us/cdn-cgi/imag ... g?v=tltpia

Posted: **Fri Oct 02, 2026 7:07 am**

Walker trolls us with his wilful ignorance.

Posted: **Fri Oct 02, 2026 12:09 pm**

A mere human, lesser Conclusion:
The human consensus that human activity is the main cause of climate change is obviously ridiculous, since climate has always changed, and without the help of humans as the main cause, in the past the climate has changed more quickly with only the earth's, the atmosphere's, and the sun's natural, lesser causes as the driving force of change, e.g., the onset of an ice age.

"The idea that my client is the main cause of the Mr. Body's death is obviously ridiculous, since people die without the help of humans as the main cause. In the past, billions of people have died with only natural causes as the driving force.

You must, therefore, find my client innocent on the charge of murder. "

Posted: **Fri Oct 02, 2026 5:24 pm**

Walker wrote: ↑Fri Oct 02, 2026 4:25 am The Don probably wanted to rename AI to MAGA, or Trump

That sounds quite plausible tbh.

Nonetheless, his order is that you should cease your boring obsession with AI and develop an even sillier one with SI. If you don't, you are disloyal.

The Philosophy Now Forum

O Canada

Re: O Canada

Re: O Canada

Re: O Canada

Re: O Canada

Re: O Canada

Re: O Canada

Re: O Canada

Re: O Canada

Re: O Canada

Re: O Canada

Re: O Canada

Re: O Canada

Re: O Canada

Re: O Canada

Re: O Canada