Re: A recent "MIRACLE"
Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2024 4:17 pm
There does not seem to be any thing new coming through, nor anymore clarity being added.
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
There does not seem to be any thing new coming through, nor anymore clarity being added.
Little more need be said of floppititwank's illustrations than that they are moronic. One of them is just anagrams of "pantheism", it does include "He Spit Man" which is of course humorously homoerotic, but does not include the altogether more important "pint shame" which is something totalfishpoo should experience daily judging by state of his drunken ramblings.
pint shame <-- that's a good one!!FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 6:08 pmLittle more need be said of floppititwank's illustrations than that they are moronic. One of them is just anagrams of "pantheism", it does include "He Spit Man" which is of course humorously homoerotic, but does not include the altogether more important "pint shame" which is something totalfishpoo should experience daily judging by state of his drunken ramblings.
This one here claims that there is a 'human mind', which is made of 'many components'.Atla wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 12:15 pmUgh I'll explain how it works (how tedious). This 'God' fragment knows the things you know because you mostly share your memories, because you are in the same brain, that's how it knows its 'resons'. A human mind is made of many components that sort of have their own voices, they sort of compete for being in the focus but work together. In your head one of the most profound components broke away, that's what you think God is.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 11:54 amYou have NO idea. The wrath of God had its reasons - as I have stated - I am borderline in HEAVEN (mode) - I intend to meet the sage(s) hopefully soon.
So, in the case of "attofishpi", who and/or what is 'it', exactly, who is just torturing "it's" 'self', and, who and/or what is the 'self', exactly, when the 'it' is torturing it?
What are the words 'this God' here referring to, exactly?
Again "attofishpi" you is not helping "yourself", nor what you are wanting to express and make clear here, at all.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 12:19 pmHey, pretty certain that will be far from my mind when I go to bed shortly and God (who is rather gay if it's a 'man') gives me heavenly sexual extasy - such a torture for me these daysAtla wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 12:15 pmUgh I'll explain how it works (how tedious). This 'God' fragment knows the things you know because you mostly share your memories, because you are in the same brain, that's how it knows its 'resons'. A human mind is made of many components that sort of have their own voices, they sort of compete for being in the focus but work together. In your head one of the most profound components broke away, that's what you think God is.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 11:54 am
You have NO idea. The wrath of God had its reasons - as I have stated - I am borderline in HEAVEN (mode) - I intend to meet the sage(s) hopefully soon.
In a sense you're just torturing yourself, the wrath is also you. But you don't perceive it this way because this God appears external to you right now.![]()
How and why would a so-called 'psychotic break' be 'seen through', and also 'right away'?Atla wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 12:26 pmYes I was pretty certain about it too. Many people who have psychotic breaks, see through it right away and try to get rid of it, you however WANT it.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 12:19 pmHey, pretty certain that will be far from my mind when I go to bed shortly and God (who is rather gay if it's a 'man') gives me heavenly sexual extasy - such a torture for me these daysAtla wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 12:15 pm
Ugh I'll explain how it works (how tedious). This 'God' fragment knows the things you know because you mostly share your memories, because you are in the same brain, that's how it knows its 'resons'. A human mind is made of many components that sort of have their own voices, they sort of compete for being in the focus but work together. In your head one of the most profound components broke away, that's what you think God is.
In a sense you're just torturing yourself, the wrath is also you. But you don't perceive it this way because this God appears external to you right now.![]()
I like the painting.
I hadn't seen them. Now I have. I like them, but the Tree of Life is my favorite.Thanks.
What about the others?![]()
It is great that you have got to a point of describing/defining God in a way, which is irrefutable, but may I suggest waiting until you better 'know' what these so-called 'sage things' are, exactly, before talking 'about them'. And, especially talking 'about them' to the "believers" here of 'disbelief'.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 12:30 pmWant what? I have spent since 1997 analysing the entity that you appear to be certain does not exist - God - an intelligence that permeates ALL matter.
My WANT is to be among the sages - those that have told me a thing or two about my past life.
SEVEN!!? - please list the other 6 that are dedicated to you, you narcissistic muppet.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 12:45 pmYou've started at least 7 entire threads in a bid to get my attention. Such as this one yesterday.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 12:20 pm...pfff. I tried so hard...naaaw..FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 12:14 pm
Strange words coming from somebody who tries so hard to get my attention that he can't even post about some music he's listening to without making it about me.
PS. Just how much do you hate me?
viewtopic.php?p=727640#p727640
What "FASCISM" - simpletons as yourself appear to believe anyone that loves their country, is proud to fly the Union or St George flag as 'fascist'..do you actually know what the term means? ..or have you some ACTUAL dirt on me that supports your thus far ridiculous claim?FlashDangerpants wrote:I don't hate you, although with all this fascism you have been doing recently
You do under_stand that the ONLY time I could be deemed "psychotic" (it's God induced btw) is where I have "eaten" from the Tree of Know_Ledge.FlashDangerpants wrote:I won't be wasting any sympathy on you either. You need a doctor, you are a danger to yourself and to others.
How much did you plead to Rick for that? You once asked me how I managed to return to the forum that I must have done some serious grovelling..no, Rick simply banned me for a week - due to my dropping the C bomb on Will (he annoyed me re a graph while I drank too many expresso martinis n beers)FlashDangerpants wrote:You should be banned from this forum for your behaviour.
So anyone with a certificate of acceptance into the world of "schizophrenia" must be banned from such activities?FlashDangerpants wrote:You should not be left unattended near schools or allowed onto aeroplanes at all.
It's the Tree of Know_Ledge !Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 9:36 pmI like the painting.I hadn't seen them. Now I have. I like them, but the Tree of Life is my favorite.Thanks.
What about the others?![]()

So, if 'It', supposedly, does not permeate ALL matter, then who and/or what even is 'It', exactly, which you talk about and mention here?Atla wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 12:36 pmIt doesn't permeate ALL matter, just a chunk of your brain matter.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 12:30 pmWant what? I have spent since 1997 analysing the entity that you appear to be certain does not exist - God - an intelligence that permeates ALL matter.
My WANT is to be among the sages - those that have told me a thing or two about my past life.
That is why ''who', supposedly, does not encounter 'it'?
If this is true, then do 'you' encounter any 'gods' "atla"?
And, what is 'your GOD', exactly, "atla"?
I DONT LIEAge wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 9:31 pm The fundamental, or underlying, message that you are wanting to get across here is irrefutably True, Right, Accurate, and Correct. However, saying things like you just did here, out of annoyance, frustration, or anger, which are obviously absolutely False are not helping any one here.
Once more, this one tries to 'deflect away' from the irrefutable Fact that it will not 'clarify'.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 3:11 pmObviously I wanted him to read and think about what I described writing above. I think you have enough trouble understanding what is written in reponse to your posts. You seem even more clueless when you ask about or comment on communication aimed at other people who have more complete communication tool boxes.Age wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 2:57 pmOkay.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:52 am I was desribing a specific situation, with a specific kind of communication he was engaging in and saying what I thought the limitations were and contrasting his claimed/implied intent with that.
But, once once, my actual clarifying question, to this one, remains not yet clarified, again.
But I was not reminded 'you'.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 3:15 pmPerhaps you are writing this to yourself, here. Surely, you must know that I know that I wrote what I wrote. There's no need to remind me.