Re: P=P is a Contradiction
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2020 10:10 pm
OK, you are claiming that a straight line is not the shortest distance between 2 points! I disagree and so do all mathematicians.
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
You spoke nonsense and asserted it as truth. How could anyone take you seriously?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 5:31 pm That's too bad. I'm not interested in the side road that interests you. Feel free to hold forth on it as you like...I'm working on the law of identity, and nothing else.
I'm not provoking. I'm asking you in all seriousness to either defend or retract your claim that the law of identity is trivial by virtue of its being a tautology. You made the statement. If you're wrong or you misspoke yourself or you phrased your remark carelessly, why not just admit it and clarify yourself? Else you look unserious, like the worst trolls on this site.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 12:02 amI admire your attempt to provoke. It's not transparent at all...really. Totally fooled me.
You do fine arguing with the cranks. But when someone who knows what they're talking about calls you on a false statement, you run away. Pathetic.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 12:14 amYeah, okay.
Got anything on the actual law of identity?
If not, no thanks.
I have read Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations some years ago...raw_thought wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:01 pm http://www.nizkor.com/features/fallacie ... ority.html
If you had read Wittgenstein you would have seen that contradictions are always false. A and not A cannot both be true. Can you give me an example where both A and not A are both true? You are probably confusing truth with validity. here is an argument that is true but invalid. 1. Obama was president.2. Nixon was president. 3. Therefore dogs are mammals. Here is a syllogism that is valid but false. 1. All Martians eat snakes. 2 Bob is a Martian. 3. Therefore Bob eats snakes. Yes, contradictions are invalid. But the result is always false.
With Wittgenstien being referenced as an authority to the subject.raw_thought wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:08 pm there is nothing wrong with appealing to authority. For example, every scientific organization in the world supports the proposition that global warming is real and we have facilitated it. Is that 100% proof ? No. But it makes the probability that global warming exists outrageously probable. However, I did not just appeal to authority. I suggested that you read more on the subject.
The dot that is diagonal from the center is 4 units away from the centrer.raw_thought wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 10:08 pm You wrote, "Show me a distance between the centre and circumference that is less than 4."
Umm the dot that is diagonal from the center.
Wow. You have an immense capability for misunderstanding.raw_thought wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 10:10 pm OK, you are claiming that a straight line is not the shortest distance between 2 points! I disagree and so do all mathematicians.
Sure if you take perpendicular steps BUT THAT IS NOT A RADIUS! Like I said by your "reasoning" I can say that I am 80,000 miles from New York. All I have to do is go back and forth. Look up radius, by definition it is one continuous straight line.Skepdick wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 9:12 amThe dot that is diagonal from the center is 4 units away from the centrer.raw_thought wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 10:08 pm You wrote, "Show me a distance between the centre and circumference that is less than 4."
Umm the dot that is diagonal from the center.
Can you even count?
It is a radius!raw_thought wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:17 pm Sure if you take perpendicular steps BUT THAT IS NOT A RADIUS! Like I said by your "reasoning" I can say that I am 80,000 miles from New York. All I have to do is go back and forth. Look up radius, by definition it is one continuous straight line.
" a straight line extending from the center.,," FROM https://www.dictionary.com/browse/radius