God(s)

[nothing]

Because the Muslim worships Muhammad (while having no knowledge of what idol worship is), they grow enmity and desire to spill blood if/when Muhammad is ridiculed as being an infidel man. The problem is: he was one, thus Islam is itself an infidel 'state' owing to it being established upon the sexual degeneracy of Muhammad himself which is taken as "acceptable".

So much for all your hot air.
But so what?
What are you going to do about it?
And why should we care?

Working on a theorem that collapses Judaism/Christianity/Islam:



It solves for the problem of good/evil and designates Islam as the global root(s) of:

Nazism (Hitler and Muhammad are the same archetype)
Fascism (Islam is a supremacist 'state' which militarily suppresses all others)
Socialism (Muhammadans intentionally create poverty in non-Muslims nations)

It also solves for the Original Sin, Mark of Cain, Mark of the Beast and "Shaytan" - all of which are present in/of the House of Swine.

You could care that the shahada is a false testimony contrary to the ten commandments, thus there is not a single Muslim who has ever lived, is living now, or will ever live that does not fundamentally violate the Abrahamic commandments in order to join Islam - not to mention the ignorance of the first-and-only warning from the Abrahamic god: do not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, else death. All Muslims eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil by being "believers" as the "religion of Adam" is getting kicked out of Eden for blaming his own iniquity on the woman. The elaboration of this is the hijab viz. Islam is the 'Original Sin' in perpetuity - abuse of women. All the "believing" Muslim can do is attempt to project / blame others for their own crimes against humanity, which is the same as the original sin: to blame others. Muhammadans do this religiously thus are the ones "devolving" back into a base animal nature rooted in hatred and divisiveness rather than love and unity.

An all-knowing god would (does) know that only satan requires belief.
All-knowing negates all-belief-based ignorance, which is what Islam is.

Mecca did not even exist in the time of Muhammad, thus Muhammad can not have established a qibla towards Mecca. All mosques built up until 730 CE were facing Petra in South Jordan, which is where Muhammad lived and started Islam. This point illustrates how retarded Islam is: the Muslims do not even know their own history. They just "believe" in a completely fabricated one, as with the book, as with the idol Muhammad.

[Sculptor]

Oh look we have entered KOOKSVILLE

[nothing]

Oh look we have entered KOOKSVILLE

You are projecting again - the accuser is the accused. Islam is "KOOKSVILLE" - spilling blood over man-made books and dead pedophile men while religiously accusing all others for what the Neo-Jew Yahooslim is themselves guilty of.

You're a bigot! - Believing the Qur'an came from a god is bigotry.
You're a racist! - Islam is a racist 'state' militarily persecuting "white" people
You're an Islamophobe! - Muhammadans can not stand ridicule thus are themselves "Islamophobic" viz. the accuser is the accused
You're a (race) supremacist! - Believing the Qur'an is superior to all other texts is supremacist

These are all qualities/characteristics of the projecting Neo-Jew Yahooslim, yet their religion is to blame any/all others for their own crimes, just as Adam blamed his own iniquity onto Eve. Religion of Adam indeed!

[Sculptor]

Oh look we have entered KOOKSVILLE

You are projecting again - the accuser is the accused. Islam is "KOOKSVILLE" - spilling blood over man-made books and dead pedophile men while religiously accusing all others for what the Neo-Jew Yahooslim is themselves guilty of.

You're a bigot! - Believing the Qur'an came from a god is bigotry.
You're a racist! - Islam is a racist 'state' militarily persecuting "white" people
You're an Islamophobe! - Muhammadans can not stand ridicule thus are themselves "Islamophobic" viz. the accuser is the accused
You're a (race) supremacist! - Believing the Qur'an is superior to all other texts is supremacist

These are all qualities/characteristics of the projecting Neo-Jew Yahooslim, yet their religion is to blame any/all others for their own crimes, just as Adam blamed his own iniquity onto Eve. Religion of Adam indeed!

LOL
QED
What I said about!

[nothing]

LOL
QED
What I said about!

Yes - what you "said about" is QED of Islam being 'KOOKSVILLE'.

It takes a "believer" to "believe" the opposite of what is true:



Therefor the "believer" will simply project their own internal 'state' as owing to others - the accuser is the accused.

Any others?

[Eodnhoj7]

LOL
QED
What I said about!

Yes - what you "said about" is QED of Islam being 'KOOKSVILLE'.

It takes a "believer" to "believe" the opposite of what is true:



Therefor the "believer" will simply project their own internal 'state' as owing to others - the accuser is the accused.

Are you projecting that others project?

Any others?

[nothing]

Are you projecting that others project?

No - however will acknowledge if/when applicable.

It only ever applies to people who are in 'ad hominem' mode (ie. "canaanite") and their only focus is on the individual.

You! You! You!

Comparison. Idol worship (love of self / hate of other) viz. "us vs. them".

viewtopic.php?f=11&t=27936

The time is near.

[Eodnhoj7]

Are you projecting that others project?

No - however will acknowledge if/when applicable.

But you see a principle, others do not see, embody it and in turn apply it.

It only ever applies to people who are in 'ad hominem' mode (ie. "canaanite") and their only focus is on the individual.

Yet all objective truths are composed of individuals seeing the same thing.

You! You! You!

Comparison. Idol worship (love of self / hate of other) viz. "us vs. them".

Hatred of other is hatred of self.

viewtopic.php?f=11&t=27936

The time is near.

[nothing]

But you see a principle, others do not see, embody it and in turn apply it.

As +A approaches -A, it is like removing distorted lenses which hitherto distorted perception.
The "principle" was/is always true, thus the problem collapses locally according to ones own 'body of ignorance' +A.

Yet all objective truths are composed of individuals seeing the same thing.

Try the inverse: all objective falsities are composed of individuals seeing some particular distortion.

Each is their own +A. CKIIT is thus designed to 'orient' any being towards -A by giving them the roots √+A and √-A as the two trees.
For example, the Islamic shahada is a necessarily false testimony, thus exists as an indefinite -A counter-part to any/all suffering due to "belief" in/of Islam (in its entirety).
This one knowledge-negating-belief would alleviate probably over half of present-day human suffering, hence exampled.

Hatred of other is hatred of self.

"Believer vs. Unbeliever" = "Us vs. Them"

CKIIT addresses this conflict by undermining it entirely.

So-called "Satan" is invariably pinned to one side.

It takes a "believer" to "believe" the opposite of what is true. Thus, take any belief-based proposition and try its inverse (the real power of CKIIT). If the inverse is "more true" that the original, it leads back to a "root" which, if/when known, is a source of knowledge. Each "root" thus leads back to a more universal "root" which eventually leads back to the root-of-all-roots. CKIIT places this in the hand of a being: the will, the alpha and omega, and the two trees.

[Eodnhoj7]

But you see a principle, others do not see, embody it and in turn apply it.

As +A approaches -A, it is like removing distorted lenses which hitherto distorted perception.
The "principle" was/is always true, thus the problem collapses locally according to ones own 'body of ignorance' +A.

But that truth is distorted by perception according to you.

Yet all objective truths are composed of individuals seeing the same thing.

Try the inverse: all objective falsities are composed of individuals seeing some particular distortion.

Each is their own +A. CKIIT is thus designed to 'orient' any being towards -A by giving them the roots √+A and √-A as the two trees.
For example, the Islamic shahada is a necessarily false testimony, thus exists as an indefinite -A counter-part to any/all suffering due to "belief" in/of Islam (in its entirety).
This one knowledge-negating-belief would alleviate probably over half of present-day human suffering, hence exampled.

Hatred of other is hatred of self.

"Believer vs. Unbeliever" = "Us vs. Them"

So as a nonbeliever you are promoting an "us vs. them" mentality....sounds slot like projecting enmity.

CKIIT addresses this conflict by undermining it entirely.

So-called "Satan" is invariably pinned to one side.

It takes a "believer" to "believe" the opposite of what is true. Thus, take any belief-based proposition and try its inverse (the real power of CKIIT). If the inverse is "more true" that the original, it leads back to a "root" which, if/when known, is a source of knowledge. Each "root" thus leads back to a more universal "root" which eventually leads back to the root-of-all-roots. CKIIT places this in the hand of a being: the will, the alpha and omega, and the two trees.

Inverse is merely assumed as all assumptions are inversive my nature. I assume one thing and a projection of it occurs in a new form by default.

[nothing]

But that truth is distorted by perception according to you.

Not all perception is distorted - it is only distorted in relation to the presence of +A.
If one knows +A exists, one can infer -A hence: conscious knowledge of ignorance
and (inference) theorem. Five components: consciousness, (tree of) knowledge,
(tree of) suffering/death, alpha (all) and omega (not). All inference(s) reduce into alpha/omega.

So as a nonbeliever you are promoting an "us vs. them" mentality....sounds slot like projecting enmity.

You have it the wrong way around (again).

The theorem collapses the "us vs. them" mentality. That's the problem it is addressing. How could you get that confused?
Are you on the any-side of the divisive? Is there enmity present? Do you have desire to spill blood as well?

Inverse is merely assumed as all assumptions are inversive my nature. I assume one thing and a projection of it occurs in a new form by default.

incoherent

[Eodnhoj7]

But that truth is distorted by perception according to you.

Not all perception is distorted - it is only distorted in relation to the presence of +A.
If one knows +A exists, one can infer -A hence: conscious knowledge of ignorance
and (inference) theorem. Five components: consciousness, (tree of) knowledge,
(tree of) suffering/death, alpha (all) and omega (not). All inference(s) reduce into alpha/omega.

You are using variables that can equate to anything.

So as a nonbeliever you are promoting an "us vs. them" mentality....sounds slot like projecting enmity.

You have it the wrong way around (again).

No, don't project enmity now.

The theorem collapses the "us vs. them" mentality. That's the problem it is addressing. How could you get that confused?
Are you on the any-side of the divisive? Is there enmity present? Do you have desire to spill blood as well?

Inverse is merely assumed as all assumptions are inversive my nature. I assume one thing and a projection of it occurs in a new form by default.

incoherent

You theory? Yes.

[leqisuva]

I think God exists if we mean a physical law that humanity has not yet discovered

[nothing]

You are using variables that can equate to anything.

That is the beauty of it.

No, don't project enmity now.

Are you talking to yourself again?

You theory? Yes.

(!)

Do you own yourself like that with purpose?

[Eodnhoj7]

You are using variables that can equate to anything.

That is the beauty of it.

Then your stance is negated by the fallacy of equivocation where "A" can replaced by "All" with belief being a subset of all.

No, don't project enmity now.

Are you talking to yourself again?

You claim "belief vs unbelief" or rather "believers vs unbelievers"; unless you admit belief to something you are creating a dichotomy of yourself vs others.

You theory? Yes.

(!)

Do you own yourself like that with purpose?

What self? The self is intrinsically empty repeating patterns.