Page 12 of 12
Re: The Contradiction of the Three Laws of Logic
Posted: Wed May 01, 2019 12:30 pm
by Logik
Speakpigeon wrote: ↑Wed May 01, 2019 12:28 pm
So... what's the problem already?
You tell me. What is your conception of a "problem" ?
There's a lengthy list of
cognitive biases and a
nifty codex. Do you recognize any of those things as "problems"?
Rather than throwing the burden of proof over the fence, try take it upon yourself from time to time...
Re: The Contradiction of the Three Laws of Logic
Posted: Wed May 01, 2019 5:25 pm
by Speakpigeon
I don't see any problem at all. Intuitionistic logicians are like all logicians, they just haven't a clue what logic is, and they also don't understand what intuitions are. So, they call themselves intuitionistic logicians...
EB
Re: The Contradiction of the Three Laws of Logic
Posted: Wed May 01, 2019 9:42 pm
by Arising_uk
Speakpigeon wrote: ↑Wed May 01, 2019 5:25 pm
I don't see any problem at all. Intuitionistic logicians are like all logicians, they just haven't a clue what logic is, and they also don't understand what intuitions are. So, they call themselves intuitionistic logicians...
EB
Er!? No.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionistic_logic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionism
Re: The Contradiction of the Three Laws of Logic
Posted: Thu May 02, 2019 8:52 am
by Speakpigeon
Er, yes.
Intuitionistic logic
Google About 196,000 results
Intuitionistic logic, sometimes more generally called constructive logic, refers to systems of symbolic logic that differ from the systems used for classical logic by more closely mirroring the notion of constructive proof
EB
