Philosophy Now Forum

Beauty wrote:

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:

Beauty wrote:
Actually I chose to preach TRUTH. And Jesus did the same. And I am nowhere saying that the golden rule is not good to be followed. But hey, you have to be literate in english to be able to read english. Since you cannot even read as I clearly see, go and become literate first and then think of brainstorming on a philosophy forum, otherwise people like you only bother others on forums, and so people like us are bothered.


First, I could not be complaining about someone's illiteracy in writing, without being literate, therefore, you just showed me exactly what a dimwit you are.
Second, the 'philosophy of religion' section of this forrum - forum.philosophynow.org suits me just fine, and my dear for your so kind information, you forget that it is for me to choose where I go and where I don't, not for you to choose for me. Perhaps you can revise your rights once again and not come and interfere in mine?

Clearly 'english' is not the same language as 'English'. And 'philosophy of religion' isn't an excuse to proselytise and god-bother.

I will not respond, if you quote me wrong! I don't have to.

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:

Beauty wrote:

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Clearly 'english' is not the same language as 'English'. And 'philosophy of religion' isn't an excuse to proselytise and god-bother.

I will not respond, if you quote me wrong! I don't have to.

You were the one complaining about someone else's literacy (or lack thereof). I'm simply pointing out that if you are going to do that then you had better be certain that your English is perfect. Where did I quote you incorrectly? Oh, I see that you have gone back and made 'corrections' ('edited 2times') What a twit.
BTW. You are not here to 'philosophise', you are here to 'proselytise'. There is a huge difference. In fact, they are opposites.

Beauty wrote:

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:

Beauty wrote:
I will not respond, if you quote me wrong! I don't have to.

You were the one complaining about someone else's literacy (or lack thereof). I'm simply pointing out that if you are going to do that then you had better be certain that your English is perfect. Where did I quote you incorrectly? Oh, I see that you have gone back and made 'corrections' ('edited 2times') What a twit.
BTW. You are not here to 'philosophise', you are here to 'proselytise'. There is a huge difference. In fact, they are opposites.

My having edited is not any reason why you have found an excuse to quote me wrong.

Beauty wrote:I have decided to not respond to abuse on the forum. This matter is closed, as far as I know.

Beauty wrote:I have decided to not respond to abuse on the forum.

Beauty wrote:God is Good, Devil is evil.
God is justice, Devil is injustice.
Our life is consequence to our own past actions - justice is done.
The Cosmic Law - Natural Law - doing justice to all, goes like this:
Our action --> our consequence --> our fate.
No use blaming God.

bobevenson wrote:Where in the book of Revelation does it talk about a golden rule, or anywhere else in the Bible for that matter?

bobevenson wrote:Please, you are an insult to the scholars of the KJV!

Harbal wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Please, you are an insult to the scholars of the KJV!

I don't have a problem with that.

bobevenson wrote: You're right, Harbal, the King James Bible is a waste of paper and, by the way, I'm not really a prophet.

bobevenson wrote:Again, England has digressed from the genius of the King James scholars to the pathetic likes of you!