Obvious Leo wrote:You shouldn't assume that the US systems of jurisprudence are typical of those practiced in other western democracies.
You're right, other western democracies are worse.
Obvious Leo wrote:You shouldn't assume that the US systems of jurisprudence are typical of those practiced in other western democracies.
What do you mean "an insurance bubble." What the fuck are you talking about? Spell it out in detail, pal!mickthinks wrote:bob: Why don't you tell me specifically what you think financial institutions did wrong in the absence of fraud.
They created a mortgage and insurance bubble precipitating a crisis that nearly destroyed the US and other economies, and which still hasn't been fixed, but which has cost the ordinary citizens billions of dollars to prop up the system. Market failure on a gargantuan global scale.
IS that as bad as it gets? It's colder than I expected, but not that cold really.Obvious Leo wrote:Where I live typical mid- winter nighttime temps would range between -2 and +3 and daytime between +5 and +10. However there are many colder places. This is quite typical of inland southern Australia but the coastal climate is far more benign and that's where most people live.Hobbes' Choice wrote: So what do you classify as cold? What is the highest daytime and lowest night time temps????
Why are you asking Bob that, he's clueless.mickthinks wrote:bob: Why don't you tell me specifically what you think financial institutions did wrong in the absence of fraud.
They created a mortgage and insurance bubble precipitating a crisis that nearly destroyed the US and other economies, and which still hasn't been fixed, but which has cost the ordinary citizens billions of dollars to prop up the system. Market failure on a gargantuan global scale.
The only bubbles you're familiar with are the ones that come out of your ass in the bathtub.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Why are you asking Bob that, he's clueless.mickthinks wrote:bob: Why don't you tell me specifically what you think financial institutions did wrong in the absence of fraud.
They created a mortgage and insurance bubble precipitating a crisis that nearly destroyed the US and other economies, and which still hasn't been fixed, but which has cost the ordinary citizens billions of dollars to prop up the system. Market failure on a gargantuan global scale.
In other words the entire global financial system is nothing more than a gigantic Ponzi scheme. ( If you don't know what that is Bob, then you must look it up.) The GFC was the first collapse of the scheme but the next one will be far worse.mickthinks wrote:I mean a surge in the credit default swaps market caused by speculation, resulting in paper fortunes that evaporate when reality catches up.
Stick your so-called Ponzi scheme up your ass. Please tell me specifically what the hell you think banks did wrong in the absence of fraud.Obvious Leo wrote:In other words the entire global financial system is nothing more than a gigantic Ponzi scheme. ( If you don't know what that is Bob, then you must look it up.) The GFC was the first collapse of the scheme but the next one will be far worse.mickthinks wrote:I mean a surge in the credit default swaps market caused by speculation, resulting in paper fortunes that evaporate when reality catches up.
You obviously don't know what a Ponzi scheme is. For instance, it offers people very high interest rates on an investment, but pays the interest from the money of new investors who hear about the program. No investments are ever actually made, and eventually most of the people lose all their so-called investment. This is fraud. What banks are doing is not fraud.Obvious Leo wrote:It wasn't me who claimed that the banks did not behave fraudulently, Bob, so you're directing your question at the wrong person. What they did and continue to do is fraudulent on any measure because making money out of making money is what defines a Ponzi scheme. Such schemes ALWAYS end in tears and the poor buggers at the bottom of the financial heap ALWAYS finish up picking up the tab.
I think I won't bother discussing the finer points of the financial world with you, Bob.bobevenson wrote:You obviously don't know what a Ponzi scheme is. For instance, it offers people very high interest rates on an investment, but pays the interest from the money of new investors who hear about the program. No investments are ever actually made, and eventually most of the people lose all their so-called investment. This is fraud. What banks are doing is not fraud.Obvious Leo wrote:It wasn't me who claimed that the banks did not behave fraudulently, Bob, so you're directing your question at the wrong person. What they did and continue to do is fraudulent on any measure because making money out of making money is what defines a Ponzi scheme. Such schemes ALWAYS end in tears and the poor buggers at the bottom of the financial heap ALWAYS finish up picking up the tab.
How could you possibly discuss something you know nothing about?Obvious Leo wrote:I think I won't bother discussing the finer points of the financial world with you, Bob.bobevenson wrote:You obviously don't know what a Ponzi scheme is. For instance, it offers people very high interest rates on an investment, but pays the interest from the money of new investors who hear about the program. No investments are ever actually made, and eventually most of the people lose all their so-called investment. This is fraud. What banks are doing is not fraud.Obvious Leo wrote:It wasn't me who claimed that the banks did not behave fraudulently, Bob, so you're directing your question at the wrong person. What they did and continue to do is fraudulent on any measure because making money out of making money is what defines a Ponzi scheme. Such schemes ALWAYS end in tears and the poor buggers at the bottom of the financial heap ALWAYS finish up picking up the tab.