Page 106 of 1324
Re: Christianity
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:40 pm
by henry quirk
age,
You seem to have JUMPED, VERY QUICKLY, here that God is a person.
nope...that's been my position from the start
And, what, EXACTLY, is your "holy book"?
I don't have one
Re: Christianity
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:56 pm
by henry quirk
lace,
FOR FUCK SAKE, HENRY...
Human words and beliefs do not necessarily answer that question in an unbiased and logical way if they are describing what man might want to believe/imagine.
This all may be true, but that has nuthin' to do with the word God and its accepted meaning. If we're talkin' about God, then we're talkin' about a person. If we're not talkin' about a person, then -- in context -- we're not talkin' about God (or any god).
Then might it be possible that a god is not 'a being' in the way that humans frame such a thing?
Sure, but then we're not talkin' about God anymore. If the entity or force isn't a person, has no being, then we're not talkin' about God (or any god).
Re: Christianity
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 4:00 pm
by henry quirk
sculptor,
Then might it be possible that a god is not?
Yep. It's possible we are amoral, morally-vacant, ape-variants livin' in an amoral, Godless, universe.
Re: Christianity
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 5:51 pm
by uwot
henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 4:00 pmIt's possible we are amoral, morally-vacant, ape-variants livin' in an amoral, Godless, universe.
Is there any reason to think that is not the case?
Re: Christianity
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 6:00 pm
by Lacewing
henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:56 pm
Lacewing:
Then might it be possible that a god is not 'a being' in the way that humans frame such a thing?
If the entity or force isn't a person, has no being, then we're not talkin' about God (or any god).
Do you think that all gods throughout human history have been imagined as persons?
This discussion began talking about an 'intelligent being'... then YOU introduced the concept of 'God' (and all you think it implies) because, apparently, your brain can't grasp anything other than that. So, yes, you've been distorting the discussion with your limited projections and beliefs.
Re: Christianity
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 6:06 pm
by Lacewing
henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 4:00 pm
It's possible we are amoral, morally-vacant, ape-variants livin' in an amoral, Godless, universe.
As demonstrated, we are able to be and do all kinds of things regardless of beliefs.
Re: Christianity
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 7:11 pm
by Lacewing
Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 2:36 pm
Lacewing wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 12:39 pm
Then might it be possible that a god is not 'a being' in the way that humans frame such a thing?
Then might it be possible that a god is not?
The god imagery created by humans all throughout history has never turned out to be more than human creations of their time period.
Interesting how Christianity wrote-in the idea of a grand revelation and judgement
'coming someday', to secure and perpetuate it indefinitely.
Claiming (suddenly at that time in history) there can be 'no other gods' -- only
this one is 'true'. How many times has humankind done that throughout history?
Human history shows that religions last thousands of years before people work through them. A sign of how programmable humans are, and how dependent they are on their programs. Very imaginative species, apparently programming ourselves.
Re: Christianity
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:22 pm
by henry quirk
Lacewing wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 6:06 pm
henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 4:00 pm
It's possible we are amoral, morally-vacant, ape-variants livin' in an amoral, Godless, universe.
As demonstrated, we are able to be and do all kinds of things regardless of beliefs.
free will is a bitch

Re: Christianity
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:24 pm
by henry quirk
Do you think that all gods throughout human history have been imagined as persons?
cite one who hasn't been taken or seen as a person
Re: Christianity
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:42 pm
by henry quirk
uwot wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 5:51 pm
henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 4:00 pmIt's possible we are amoral, morally-vacant, ape-variants livin' in an amoral, Godless, universe.
Is there any reason to think that is not the case?
Here are 4 that work for me (along with all the more formal arguments)...
The existence of mind, free will,
ownness, and conscience.
Re: Christianity
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 11:05 pm
by Sculptor
Lacewing wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 7:11 pm
Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 2:36 pm
Lacewing wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 12:39 pm
Then might it be possible that a god is not 'a being' in the way that humans frame such a thing?
Then might it be possible that a god is not?
The god imagery created by humans all throughout history has never turned out to be more than human creations of their time period.
Interesting how Christianity wrote-in the idea of a grand revelation and judgement
'coming someday', to secure and perpetuate it indefinitely.
Claiming (suddenly at that time in history) there can be 'no other gods' -- only
this one is 'true'. How many times has humankind done that throughout history?
Human history shows that religions last thousands of years before people work through them. A sign of how programmable humans are, and how dependent they are on their programs. Very imaginative species, apparently programming ourselves.
You say it like it is inevitable, yet programming can be broken.
South Korea is 56% non religious.
Most wester countries are showing growing rejection of all religion.
Re: Christianity
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 11:45 pm
by Age
henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:40 pm
age,
You seem to have JUMPED, VERY QUICKLY, here that God is a person.
nope...that's been my position from the start
Because you have, ONCE AGAIN, JUMPED, VERY QUICKLY, to an ASSUMPTION, BEFORE you have begun to make ANY CLARIFICATION AT ALL, you have answered Falsely, Wrongly, and Incorrectly, AGAIN.
If you EVER do DECIDE to seek out CLARIFICATION, especially in regards to my words, BEFORE you make ASSUMPTIONS, then you WILL find out that what I am ACTUALLY saying and MEANING is, just about on EVERY occasion, MUCH DIFFERENT from what you first ASSUME and think, on FIRST GLANCE.
But please feel FREE to carry on the way you have been here.
henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:40 pm
And, what, EXACTLY, is your "holy book"?
I don't have one
Okay.
Re: Christianity
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 11:54 pm
by Age
henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:56 pm
lace,
FOR FUCK SAKE, HENRY...
Human words and beliefs do not necessarily answer that question in an unbiased and logical way if they are describing what man might want to believe/imagine.
This all may be true, but that has nuthin' to do with the word God and its accepted meaning. If we're talkin' about God, then we're talkin' about a person.
When 'you', "henry quirk", are talking about 'God', then 'you' may well be talking about 'a person'. But, most people that I know of are CERTAINLY NOT talking about 'a person' when they talk about 'God'.
In fact they thing it would be absolutely ABSURD to even think or imagine that God, Itself, was or could even be 'a person'. So, if we are talking about God, then we are CERTAINLY NOT talking about 'a person' AT ALL.
But who and what 'we' are is YET to be DISCOVERED and CLARIFIED, correct?
henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:40 pm
If we're not talkin' about a person, then -- in context -- we're not talkin' about God (or any god).
Okay.
henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 3:40 pm
Then might it be possible that a god is not 'a being' in the way that humans frame such a thing?
Sure, but then we're not talkin' about God anymore. If the entity or force isn't a person, has no being, then we're not talkin' about God (or any god).
So, here you are now suggesting that God is NOT 'a being' but rather 'has' 'a being', correct?
If no, then what is correct here?
Re: Christianity
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2021 12:00 am
by Age
uwot wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 5:51 pm
henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 4:00 pmIt's possible we are amoral, morally-vacant, ape-variants livin' in an amoral, Godless, universe.
Is there any reason to think that is not the case?
Yes. The very fact of what the word 'God' refers to, EXACTLY, and how 'that' ACTUALLY EXISTS, is a reason WHY to NOT think that 'you', human beings, are NOT living in a Godless Universe.
In fact, when LOOKED INTO the figure of speech, 'Godless Universe', is an oxymoron.
As the two are INSEPARABLE, and thus an IMPOSSIBILITY.
But not EVERY one, in the days when this is being written, SEES what I SEE, and UNDERSTAND, YET.
Re: Christianity
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2021 12:26 am
by uwot
henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:42 pm
uwot wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 5:51 pm
henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 10, 2021 4:00 pmIt's possible we are amoral, morally-vacant, ape-variants livin' in an amoral, Godless, universe.
Is there any reason to think that is not the case?
Here are 4 that work for me (along with all the more formal arguments)...
The existence of mind, free will,
ownness, and conscience.
Great that they work for you. Is that any reason they should work for others?