Philosophy Now Forum

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:17 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:55 am

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:50 am
Age is not a bot.

No, Age (aka, "Ken") is an ancient, channeled entity who claims to have helped inspire the writing of the Bible.

Ken (aka, Age) wrote the following back in 2017:
_______

How do you know this? There doesn't seem to be a member called 'Ken'. Looks like this 'Ken' is ripping off panpsychism to make himself appear 'mysterious'. How mature.

Ken (or "ken") changed his forum moniker to Age back in 2018.

Here is the 2017 post from "ken" that the quote is taken from...

viewtopic.php?p=319795&hilit=spiring#p3 ... %20with%2C

Notice how Age is complaining about my interpretation of that excerpt, but doesn't make the slightest effort to clarify what he "really" meant.

I try not to get drawn into Age's/ken's nonsense, but sometimes I can't help myself, because even though (for whatever reason) he is clearly oblivious and too lacking in self-awareness to realize it, he, in essence, is a forum bully who constantly ridicules pretty much everyone here with his incessant and juvenile use of "LOLs" in response to most of our comments.

I don't like bullies, which is why I come down hard on him from time to time - even though it is an exercise in futility.
_______

Thanks. Yes, he is a vile little bully, bot or otherwise. And you would think that the 'THE ONE' who is responsible for the bible and every other important literary work would have much better writing skills. I mean ''Actual and true fact''? What other kind of 'fact' is there?

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:17 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:55 am

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:50 am
Age is not a bot.

No, Age (aka, "Ken") is an ancient, channeled entity who claims to have helped inspire the writing of the Bible.

Ken (aka, Age) wrote the following back in 2017:
_______

How do you know this? There doesn't seem to be a member called 'Ken'. Looks like this 'Ken' is ripping off panpsychism to make himself appear 'mysterious'. How mature.

Ken (or "ken") changed his forum moniker to Age back in 2018.

Here is the 2017 post from "ken" that the quote is taken from...

viewtopic.php?p=319795&hilit=spiring#p3 ... %20with%2C

Notice how Age is complaining about my interpretation of that excerpt, but doesn't make the slightest effort to clarify what he "really" meant.

I try not to get drawn into Age's/ken's nonsense, but sometimes I can't help myself, because even though (for whatever reason) he is clearly oblivious and too lacking in self-awareness to realize it, he, in essence, is a forum bully who constantly ridicules pretty much everyone here with his incessant and juvenile use of "LOLs" in response to most of our comments.

I don't like bullies, which is why I come down hard on him from time to time - even though it is an exercise in futility.
_______

I see you are correct. Obviously the same user. 'Ken's' last post was Aug 5 2018 at 7:07pm. 'Age' joined Aug 5 2018 at 7:17pm.

LOL
LOL
LOL
LOL
LOL

I'm guessing that 'Ken' was banned, which would explain why his first post as 'Age' was normal, with no caps, so as not to alert the mods since your first comment on here has to go through the moderator before it's posted.

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2025 10:47 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2025 10:16 pm Absolutely NO sign of a personality of ANY description whatsoever.

There were however a series of posts, I forgot where, in which he wrote moving prose (no capitals mind you) about one of his first childhood toys: a red fire engine with an extending ladder and a hose that actually squirted. I thought it was quite touching. But I might be getting soft.

Not Age. Perhpas The Doc?

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:46 am

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:50 am
Ken (aka, Age) wrote the following back in 2017:

"...This impatience comes out and through the one, which I am using, who is writing this. This is a bit like how the ones, I used who wrote the bible, misinterpreted what I was actually trans and in spiring to them, which obviously has caused a lot of confusion. Now I found another human being who I can use to share things..."

Okay look, I relate to this. I have myself been responsible for many (most) of the important texts. Aeschylus for example. A lot of Plato (The Laws). Herodotus.

These are just a few.

Here, 'we' SEE ANOTHER CLEAR example of one who just can NOT READ, and COMPREHEND, while ALSO having BEEN TRICKED, FOOLED, and DECEIVED INTO BELIEVING some thing, which another one VERY FOOLISHLY TRICKED, FOOLED, and DECEIVED "itself" INTO BELIEVING is True.

As for the REST OF 'you' who ARE ACTUALLY CURIOS, which at 'current rates' is NONE OF 'these posters', here, then I CAN and WILL SHOW not just, HOW but WHY, 'these ones' SO EASILY MISINTERPRET 'the words', here.

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:54 am

ONCE AGAIN, MORE OBVIOUS ABSOLUTE LIES, which as AGAIN and ALWAYS is proved absolutely True.

Can you elaborate?

Yes.

What would you like me to elaborate ON, EXACTLY?

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:54 am Lies that are proved true is such an interesting field. I am pretty knowledgeable here. DM me, please.

What does 'DM' mean, here?

If it means 'direct message', you, then WHY?

Is there some thing that you want to HIDE from the readers, here? Or, is there some other reason?

you are, supposedly and allegedly, 'pretty knowledgeable, here,' in regards to 'what', EXACTLY?

you have MISREAD, MISUNDERSTOOD, and/or MISINTERPRETED what I ACTUALLY SAID and MEANT above, here.

I am NOT AWARE of ANY 'lies' that are what you call 'proved true'. So, if you find 'lies that are proved true' a so-called 'interesting field', then so be it.

But, I am NOT AWARE of ANY such field.

Now, if you would like to COMPREHEND what I ACTUALLY SAID, and MEANT, then by all means let 'us' have A DISCUSSION, here, in the OPEN and NOT in PRIVATE.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:00 am

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:46 am

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:50 am
Ken (aka, Age) wrote the following back in 2017:

Okay look, I relate to this. I have myself been responsible for many (most) of the important texts. Aeschylus for example. A lot of Plato (The Laws). Herodotus.

These are just a few.

He's 'trans'? A transbot? How fascinating

HOW 'this one', 'now', come to BELIEVE and CLAIM 'these things', with question marks at the end, I will suggest that 'this one' could NOT EVEN EXPLAIN.

Interesting. Not a single 'cap', but the arrogance and condescending 'superiority' are here. I wonder why he decided to start posing as a bot.
Claims to be a 'simple, slow' person then says he ''understands all of 'life's' so called problems, and answers is really rather easy. I can see and understand why every person is the way they are and why they do the things they do.''

He doesn't get a free pass to be a complete shit-head just because he's allegedly 'autistic'. If he actually believes he's a bot or a 'god' then he needs locking up (which he probably is).

Then again, this could have been written by a bot with a bit of human input.



''I had never been a believer in god, nor anything else, nor did I know anything about philosophy. That was until i started on a journey of just wanting to change. In order to change i had to seek out help from others, I had no idea on how to become a better person by myself. But what happened as i was seeking to change was that i found that by just listening, truly listening that is, and by truly answering honestly and fully those meaningful answers of life, which we are all seeking, unwittingly or unknowingly, just start coming to light. I was not looking for answers, i was just seeking out how to change for the better, but by being truly open and honest with others, and with myself, I began to discover how the mind and the brain work, then how to gain full understanding and thus forgiveness, and then who I am, the meaning of life, why we are here, etc., etc. While discovering these I also came across a formula that, to me, shows what will lead us all into living in peace and harmony together.

Living with autism I am a very simple and slow person. I can find learning what others want to teach very confusing. I do not believe something just because something is said nor written down. If someone wants to tell me that something is true, right, or correct, then i want and need proof. For example until i discovered what god is I never believed it existed. Surprisingly it is not what most people believe it to be. I also thought that philosophy was something only smart people could understand. That was until i looked into one dictionary and one of its definitions given said that the word philosophy came from 'phil', love of, and 'sophy', wisdom. If wisdom is gained from learning, then to me 'phi-o-sophy', just means having the love of learning. This is nothing special. Every human child is born with a love of learning. Unfortunately though this love can quickly diminish with ridicule and embarrassment over time. Through others misbehavior and an unfair and unjust, so called, "education" system people learn to hate learning. Did you know the word 'education', once meant to draw out? Like in to draw out the potential within a person. But sadly the peoples of nowadays talk about an education as though it is something that the ones enrolled are meant to repeat "word-for-word" what is being taught to them, as though what is being taught is absolutely, without any questioning, true, right, and correct. If a person then does not get exactly right what is being taught to them, then somehow that person has become or supposedly stupid, dumb, not smart or one of the many other put-down names.

The reason the human animal has, for lack of a better word,"progressed" as far as we have now is because we humans inherently love to learn. When we are being an inquisitive being, and as long as we are open to and want to learn more, then we can and will learn more. In fact we can not stop learning if we are truly open. But if we are already believing (in) something, and thus being so called closed-minded, then we are not being an able to learn being. It is our unique ability to learn, understand, and reason anything/everything that is what separates us from all the other known animal species. Intelligence, which is unique to to us humans is just our ability to learn. This ability should not be mistaken for intellect. Intellect is just the things/knowledge that we have already learnt.

As long as we are open, and thus not believing nor disbelieving (in) anything, then we are being truly intelligent enough to learn more and absolutely anything, including how easy it really is for all of us to being living in true peace and harmony together.

I may be a very simple person but seeing and understanding all of 'life's' so called problems, and answers is really rather easy. I can see and understand why every person is the way they are and why they do the things they do. If I am wrong anywhere, then I am openly able to accept being proven wrong, and will thank you for showing me what is right. I always want to be open. I love being shown where I am wrong and more importantly why I am wrong. I LOVE learning more. But until then I am prepared to be challenged on any or all of this. I enjoy the challenge of learning how to show you how you also can learn how to live in peace and harmony with all others. One of the hardest things, I think, for human beings to do is show that what is right when others do not and will not believe (in) them.''

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 3:17 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:00 am

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:46 am Okay look, I relate to this. I have myself been responsible for many (most) of the important texts. Aeschylus for example. A lot of Plato (The Laws). Herodotus.

These are just a few.

He's 'trans'? A transbot? How fascinating

HOW 'this one', 'now', come to BELIEVE and CLAIM 'these things', with question marks at the end, I will suggest that 'this one' could NOT EVEN EXPLAIN.

Ken (aka, Age) wrote the following back in 2017:
"...This impatience comes out and through the one, which I am using, who is writing this. This is a bit like how the ones, I used who wrote the bible, misinterpreted what I was actually trans and in spiring to them, which obviously has caused a lot of confusion. Now I found another human being who I can use to share things..."

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:17 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:55 am

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:50 am
Age is not a bot.

No, Age (aka, "Ken") is an ancient, channeled entity who claims to have helped inspire the writing of the Bible.

Ken (aka, Age) wrote the following back in 2017:
_______

How do you know this? There doesn't seem to be a member called 'Ken'. Looks like this 'Ken' is ripping off panpsychism to make himself appear 'mysterious'. How mature.

Ken (or "ken") changed his forum moniker to Age back in 2018.

Here is the 2017 post from "ken" that the quote is taken from...

And, REMEMBER readers 'this' is 'the quote' that "seeds" had and, STILL HAS, here, COMPLETELY MISINTERPRETED and MISUNDERSTOOD.

Which can be SEEN, and PROVED, in 'this quote', here

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:17 am viewtopic.php?p=319795&hilit=spiring#p3 ... %20with%2C

Notice how Age is complaining about my interpretation of that excerpt, but doesn't make the slightest effort to clarify what he "really" meant.

LOL
LOL
LOL

ABSOLUTELY NO one has SHOWN ABSOLUTELY ANY CURIOSITY NOR INTEREST in CLARIFICATION. And, OBVIOUSLY, UNTIL some one DOES, then there is NO POINT in 'me' DOING ANY such thing, here.

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:17 am I try not to get drawn into Age's/ken's nonsense,

LOL
LOL
LOL

So, ONCE AGAIN, BEFORE ones like 'this one' WILL EVEN ENDEAVOR TO JUST TRY TO UNDERSTAND 'another', 'they' WILL PRESUME that 'they' ALREADY KNOW what is being SAID, and MEANT, IS NONSENSE.

And, it is this kind of ABSOLUTELY COMPLETELY BLIND and CLOSED viewing AND seeing WHY it took 'these ones' SO, SO LONG TO COME-TO FINDING and SEEING the ACTUAL Truth of things.

LOL 'This one', STILL, AFTER ALL OF 'this time', STILL BELIEVES that its OWN False AND Wrong INTERPRETATION is what I ACTUALLY MEANT.

'This' REALLY WAS HOW Truly BLIND, DEAF, CLOSED, and STUPID some human beings WERE, BACK in those VERY 'olden days' when this WAS being written.

JUST IMAGINE going through Life BELIEVING that your OWN INTERPRETATION was TRUE or RIGHT, while NEVER EVER SEEKING OUT ACTUAL CLARITY, BEFOREHAND. And, WORSE STILL, IMAGINE DOING 'this' in regards to what another has SAID, or WRITTEN.

LOL 'This one' ALSO MAKES 'the claim', here, 'I TRY not to get drawn into 'MY nonsense', although the ONLY ACTUAL NONSENSE, here, is "seeds" OWN Wrong AND False INTERPRETATION. Which makes ALL OF 'this' even MORE HILARIOUS.

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:17 am but sometimes I can't help myself, because even though (for whatever reason) he is clearly oblivious and too lacking in self-awareness to realize it, he, in essence, is a forum bully who constantly ridicules pretty much everyone here with his incessant and juvenile use of "LOLs" in response to most of our comments.

LOL
LOL
LOL

'This one' HAS EVEN MISINTERPRETED, ABSOLUTELY Falsely AND Wrong, just 'this', here.

LOL It did NOT MATTER HOW MANY TIMES I SUGGESTED TO 'these people', BACK in those 'olden days' when this WAS being written, TO SEEK OUT and OBTAIN ACTUAL CLARIFICATION, and CLARITY, FIRST, BEFORE they made ANY ASSUMPTIONS, AT ALL. 'they' WOULD, STILL, do the VERY OPPOSITE, and ASSUME things, FIRST, THUS PROVING, ABSOLUTELY IRREFUTABLY, what I POINTING OUT, SHOWING, and REVEALING ABOUT 'these human beings', BACK in the 'olden days', when this WAS written.

By their VERY OWN Wrong DOING, here, which is HERE for ALL TO 'LOOK AT', and 'SEE', in CLEARLY PRINTED WORDS, they HAVE, and KEEP, PROVING 'me' ABSOLUTELY Correct.

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:17 am I don't like bullies, which is why I come down hard on him from time to time - even though it is an exercise in futility.
_______

LOL

'you' have NEVER come down on 'me' in ANY WAY.

LOL 'you' KEEP PROVING 'me' True AND Right, here, "seeds".

Just quoting another, and BELIEVING that your OWN INTERPRETATION is the ONLY ONE, and is TRUE and RIGHT, is ABSOLUTE STUPIDITY, in the HIGHEST FORM.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:19 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:13 am

I know I'm pathetic AND I keep lying BECAUSE I'm evolving and practicing how to lie better. I'm so SORRY.

FFS.

'This kind of FRAUD, and ATTEMPT AT DECEPTION, is ALL 'this one' can eventually RESORT TO.

'This one' has NOTHING that it could use to back up and support its Truly CLOSED BELIEFS, and CLAIMS, so it RESORTS TO what is CLEARLY OBVIOUS ATTEMPTS AT LYING and DECEPTION.

But, AGAIN, they are NOT WORKING "accelafine". So, either KEEP DOING what you are, with NO ACTUAL CHANGE IN RESULTS. OR, TRY some thing DIFFERENT.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:25 am

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:17 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:55 am

How do you know this? There doesn't seem to be a member called 'Ken'. Looks like this 'Ken' is ripping off panpsychism to make himself appear 'mysterious'. How mature.

Ken (or "ken") changed his forum moniker to Age back in 2018.

Here is the 2017 post from "ken" that the quote is taken from...

viewtopic.php?p=319795&hilit=spiring#p3 ... %20with%2C

Notice how Age is complaining about my interpretation of that excerpt, but doesn't make the slightest effort to clarify what he "really" meant.

I try not to get drawn into Age's/ken's nonsense, but sometimes I can't help myself, because even though (for whatever reason) he is clearly oblivious and too lacking in self-awareness to realize it, he, in essence, is a forum bully who constantly ridicules pretty much everyone here with his incessant and juvenile use of "LOLs" in response to most of our comments.

I don't like bullies, which is why I come down hard on him from time to time - even though it is an exercise in futility.
_______

Thanks. Yes, he is a vile little bully, bot or otherwise. And you would think that the 'THE ONE' who is responsible for the bible and every other important literary work would have much better writing skills. I mean ''Actual and true fact''? What other kind of 'fact' is there?

LOL

'This one' has been PRETENDING TO write UNDER the label "age" SO MUCH, that it is even DOING it, here,

LOL 'Actual and true fact'. LOL LOL LOL

LOL 'This one' does NOT even COMPREHEND just HOW Truly STUPID its OTHER CLAIM is, here.

LOL Does it ACTUALLY THINK that 'the bible' has YET BEEN CLEARLY, or EVEN BEEN CLOSE TO BEING REMOTELY, UNDERSTOOD?

LOL 'This' coming FROM 'this one' who has NOT YET even WORKED OUT HOW TO READ, just 'the words', here, let alone, 'the bible', properly, NOR Correctly.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:51 am

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:17 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:55 am

How do you know this? There doesn't seem to be a member called 'Ken'. Looks like this 'Ken' is ripping off panpsychism to make himself appear 'mysterious'. How mature.

Ken (or "ken") changed his forum moniker to Age back in 2018.

Here is the 2017 post from "ken" that the quote is taken from...

viewtopic.php?p=319795&hilit=spiring#p3 ... %20with%2C

Notice how Age is complaining about my interpretation of that excerpt, but doesn't make the slightest effort to clarify what he "really" meant.

I try not to get drawn into Age's/ken's nonsense, but sometimes I can't help myself, because even though (for whatever reason) he is clearly oblivious and too lacking in self-awareness to realize it, he, in essence, is a forum bully who constantly ridicules pretty much everyone here with his incessant and juvenile use of "LOLs" in response to most of our comments.

I don't like bullies, which is why I come down hard on him from time to time - even though it is an exercise in futility.
_______

I see you are correct. Obviously the same user. 'Ken's' last post was Aug 5 2018 at 7:07pm. 'Age' joined Aug 5 2018 at 7:17pm.

LOL
LOL
LOL
LOL
LOL

LOL 'This' COMING FROM 'the one' who SPEAKS and WRITES UNDER DIFFERENT labels, here, BUT who CLAIMS that it DOES NOT.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:59 am I'm guessing that 'Ken' was banned, which would explain why his first post as 'Age' was normal, with no caps, so as not to alert the mods since your first comment on here has to go through the moderator before it's posted.

WELL 'this ones' GUESS, here, IS ABSOLUTELY Wrong, Inaccurate, AND Incorrect, AS WELL.

One day 'these posters', here, WILL LEARN and UNDERSTAND WHY it IS, and WAS, SO, SO IMPORTANT TO WANT TO SEEK OUT and OBTAIN, and GAIN, ACTUALLY CLARITY BEFORE they ASSUME or GUESS ABSOLUTELY ANY thing AT ALL.

ONCE AGAIN, FOR the VERY SLOWEST OF LEARNERS, SEE WHEN you DO 'this', then 'you' WILL NOT BE SO Wrong, and SO OFTEN Wrong, as 'this one' known, here, 'now', as "accelafine" IS.

ONCE MORE, if one NEVER ASSUMES NOR BELIEVES ANY thing, and just REMAINS OPEN, ALWAYS, then that one can NEVER EVER BE Wrong.

'I' could NOT HAVE MADE this IRREFUTABLE Fact MORE SIMPLER NOR MORE CLEARER, FOR them, BUT 'they', STILL, JUST COULD NOT YET COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND 'It'.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 3:22 am Interesting. Not a single 'cap', but the arrogance and condescending 'superiority' are here.

LOL And, WHERE would 'here' BE, EXACTLY?

Now, what can be CLEARLY SEEN FROM 'this one' AGAIN, is an ACCUSATION and CLAIM of 'arrogance' AND 'condescending superiority'. However, UNTIL 'this one' PROVIDES AN ACTUAL example of WHEN and WHERE this one BELIEVES that there is 'arrogance' AND a 'condescending superiority', then ALL 'this one' IS, essentially, DOING is JUST EXPRESSING its, UNSUBSTANTIATED, BELIEFS and VIEWS, or OPINIONS, ONLY,

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 3:22 am I wonder why he decided to start posing as a bot.

LOL 'Now', 'I' AM BACK TO BEING A "he", who LOL 'now' ONLY 'posed' AS A 'bot'.

'These ones' just COULD NOT STICK to just ONE CLAIM ABOUT 'me'.

Also, and LOL 'this one' can WONDER it IS, here, for AS LONG AS it WANTS TO. it is BASING its WONDER OFF OF its OWN ABSOLUTELY UNSUBSTANTIATED BELIEF and PRESUMPTION, ONLY.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 3:22 am Claims to be a 'simple, slow' person then says he ''understands all of 'life's' so called problems, and answers is really rather easy.

'This one', OBVIOUSLY, has NOT YET CONSIDERED what the words 'simple' AND 'slow' ACTUALLY COULD BE REFERRING TO, besides, OF COURSE, its OWN 'past experiences' WHERE it LEARNED that 'simple' AND 'slow' can ONLY EVER BE in relation TO DEROGATORY terms.

See, AGAIN, 'this one' IS PROVING, here, HOW 'the brain', with the BELIEF-system, can ACTUALLY WORK COMPLETELY AGAINST 'intelligence', and the OPEN Mind, Itself.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 3:22 am I can see and understand why every person is the way they are and why they do the things they do.''

'This one' IS ACTUALLY LAUGHING, IN A DEROGATORY FASHION, while NEVER ONCE SEEKING OUT TO OBTAIN ACTUAL CLARIFICATION, and CLARITY.

'This one' has JUST PROVED, ONCE AGAIN, that it HAS ABSOLUTELY NO CLUE NOR IDEA ABOUT what 'it' IS that I AM ACTUALLY taking ABOUT and REFERRING TO, EXACTLY.

AGAIN, 'this' is, EXACTLY, HOW 'the brain' WORKS, and WHAT HAPPENS WHEN people like 'this one' IS, here, ONLY 'LOOKING AT' and 'SEEING' things FROM and THROUGH 'the brain', ONLY.

'This one' IS 'the way' it is, here, and WHY it is doing what it is, here, BECAUSE of HOW, and WHEN 'the brain' IS WORKING IN DIRECT OPPOSITION WITH the Truly OPEN Mind.

But, it can NOT 'SEE' this, nor WILL EVER 'SEE', and UNDERSTAND 'this', AGAIN, WHILE it KEEPS DOING what it is, here. Which IS MISBEHAVING IN 'the way' that it is, here.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 3:22 am He doesn't get a free pass to be a complete shit-head just because he's allegedly 'autistic'.

But, 'I' FOR One, CERTAINLY DO NOT WANT ANY so-called 'free pass' FOR ABSOLUTELY ANY thing.

you BELIEVING and SEEING 'me' AS A 'complete shit-head' is your OWN VIEW. Which is, OBVIOUSLY, literally, ALSO ABSOLUTELY False AND Wrong. But, if 'you' REALLY WANT TO SEE 'me' in 'this way', then PLEASE KEEP ON DOING SO. AGAIN, 'you' ARE PROVING 'me' ABSOLUTELY True, Right, Accurate, AND Correct, here, in regards to 'the way' 'you' ARE, and, WHY 'you' ARE, and KEEP, DOING the things that you ARE, here.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 3:22 am If he actually believes he's a bot or a 'god' then he needs locking up (which he probably is).

LOL The ONLY ones who BELIEVE, and BELIEVE ABSOLUTELY SO, that 'I' AM A 'bot' ARE 'you' AND "wizard22", here.

LOL So, who 'now' NEEDS so-called 'locking up', EXACTLY.

Also, and LOL, 'now' I am NOT just a male gendered bot' but ALSO A probably 'locked up' 'bot', with male genitals.

you MAKE 'me' LAUGH, here, "accelafine".

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 3:22 am Then again, this could have been written by a bot with a bit of human input.

LOL HOW MANY OTHER 'maybes' are you GOING TO INTRODUCE, here?

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 3:22 am
''I had never been a believer in god, nor anything else, nor did I know anything about philosophy. That was until i started on a journey of just wanting to change. In order to change i had to seek out help from others, I had no idea on how to become a better person by myself. But what happened as i was seeking to change was that i found that by just listening, truly listening that is, and by truly answering honestly and fully those meaningful answers of life, which we are all seeking, unwittingly or unknowingly, just start coming to light. I was not looking for answers, i was just seeking out how to change for the better, but by being truly open and honest with others, and with myself, I began to discover how the mind and the brain work, then how to gain full understanding and thus forgiveness, and then who I am, the meaning of life, why we are here, etc., etc. While discovering these I also came across a formula that, to me, shows what will lead us all into living in peace and harmony together.

Living with autism I am a very simple and slow person. I can find learning what others want to teach very confusing. I do not believe something just because something is said nor written down. If someone wants to tell me that something is true, right, or correct, then i want and need proof. For example until i discovered what god is I never believed it existed. Surprisingly it is not what most people believe it to be. I also thought that philosophy was something only smart people could understand. That was until i looked into one dictionary and one of its definitions given said that the word philosophy came from 'phil', love of, and 'sophy', wisdom. If wisdom is gained from learning, then to me 'phi-o-sophy', just means having the love of learning. This is nothing special. Every human child is born with a love of learning. Unfortunately though this love can quickly diminish with ridicule and embarrassment over time. Through others misbehavior and an unfair and unjust, so called, "education" system people learn to hate learning. Did you know the word 'education', once meant to draw out? Like in to draw out the potential within a person. But sadly the peoples of nowadays talk about an education as though it is something that the ones enrolled are meant to repeat "word-for-word" what is being taught to them, as though what is being taught is absolutely, without any questioning, true, right, and correct. If a person then does not get exactly right what is being taught to them, then somehow that person has become or supposedly stupid, dumb, not smart or one of the many other put-down names.

The reason the human animal has, for lack of a better word,"progressed" as far as we have now is because we humans inherently love to learn. When we are being an inquisitive being, and as long as we are open to and want to learn more, then we can and will learn more. In fact we can not stop learning if we are truly open. But if we are already believing (in) something, and thus being so called closed-minded, then we are not being an able to learn being. It is our unique ability to learn, understand, and reason anything/everything that is what separates us from all the other known animal species. Intelligence, which is unique to to us humans is just our ability to learn. This ability should not be mistaken for intellect. Intellect is just the things/knowledge that we have already learnt.

As long as we are open, and thus not believing nor disbelieving (in) anything, then we are being truly intelligent enough to learn more and absolutely anything, including how easy it really is for all of us to being living in true peace and harmony together.

I may be a very simple person but seeing and understanding all of 'life's' so called problems, and answers is really rather easy. I can see and understand why every person is the way they are and why they do the things they do. If I am wrong anywhere, then I am openly able to accept being proven wrong, and will thank you for showing me what is right. I always want to be open. I love being shown where I am wrong and more importantly why I am wrong. I LOVE learning more. But until then I am prepared to be challenged on any or all of this. I enjoy the challenge of learning how to show you how you also can learn how to live in peace and harmony with all others. One of the hardest things, I think, for human beings to do is show that what is right when others do not and will not believe (in) them.''

THANK you "accelafine" FOR PRESENTING 'this', AGAIN, FOR me.