Page 11 of 28
Re: Trump
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2024 3:36 pm
by Sculptor
Walker wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 2:01 pm
Interesting. What you think will persuade Gary is what persuades you. There could be more substance to Gary than the shallowness you hope to awaken.
The depraived depths of moronhood to which you sink, is breathtaking
Re: Trump
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2024 3:41 pm
by Walker
Maybe they staged this with actors and such, for propaganda. Who can say for sure?
Suspected illegal migrants land on California beach, flee into neighbourhood
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76G5AzCrgYI
Re: Trump
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2024 11:52 pm
by FlashDangerpants
Behind the scenes footage of Team USA Olympic Rape squad training session.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2024 12:57 am
by Sculptor
Less than three hours after beginning deliberation, the jury in the second defamation case brought by columnist E. Jean Carroll against former President Donald Trump issues a verdict ordering him to pay her $83.3 million in damages for his defamatory statements regarding his sexual assault of Carroll in 1996. During closing arguments Carroll’s lawyers ask the jury to award her at least $24 million in damages for repeatedly defaming her account of his sexual assault of her in a department store changing room. Trump lawyer Alina Habba counters that her client should not be held liable for threats made against Carroll by his supporters. Here are the latest details in the legal battles involving the former president who hopes to be reelected to the White House in 2024.
But yeah its all ake news??
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2024 2:29 am
by commonsense
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 12:57 am
Less than three hours after beginning deliberation, the jury in the second defamation case brought by columnist E. Jean Carroll against former President Donald Trump issues a verdict ordering him to pay her $83.3 million in damages for his defamatory statements regarding his sexual assault of Carroll in 1996. During closing arguments Carroll’s lawyers ask the jury to award her at least $24 million in damages for repeatedly defaming her account of his sexual assault of her in a department store changing room. Trump lawyer Alina Habba counters that her client should not be held liable for threats made against Carroll by his supporters. Here are the latest details in the legal battles involving the former president who hopes to be reelected to the White House in 2024.
But yeah its all ake news??
All together it’s 88.3M + attorney fees. Will his campaign donors be expected to cover it, again?
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:15 am
by Sculptor
commonsense wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 2:29 am
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 12:57 am
Less than three hours after beginning deliberation, the jury in the second defamation case brought by columnist E. Jean Carroll against former President Donald Trump issues a verdict ordering him to pay her $83.3 million in damages for his defamatory statements regarding his sexual assault of Carroll in 1996. During closing arguments Carroll’s lawyers ask the jury to award her at least $24 million in damages for repeatedly defaming her account of his sexual assault of her in a department store changing room. Trump lawyer Alina Habba counters that her client should not be held liable for threats made against Carroll by his supporters. Here are the latest details in the legal battles involving the former president who hopes to be reelected to the White House in 2024.
But yeah its all ake news??
All together it’s 88.3M + attorney fees. Will his campaign donors be expected to cover it, again?
I'll think they are going to wait for the US High Court ruling in Colorado's decision to push Trump off the Ballot for aiding insurection.
I undertand that their job is not to challenge the facts of the case, but to estblish if it applies to the 14th Amendment.
I understand arguments are going to be heard 9th Feb.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2024 1:37 pm
by Impenitent
appeals? you mean these lower court rulings are not written in stone?
let the leftist wailing begin
-Imp
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2024 8:38 pm
by Walker
All proceeding according to plan. The first time around the Left vowed to impeach Trump before he was even elected. This is more of the same old same old now, which has become expected SOP, and sadly to say it's not only accepted, but encouraged. The knives are just sharper now because the Left realizes ...
"There's nothing to stop us!"
The strategy is to keep Trump out of office, and to discourage any others who won't play ball by destroying Trump. This is just another tactic.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 1:46 am
by Impenitent
Walker wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 8:38 pm
All proceeding according to plan. The first time around the Left vowed to impeach Trump before he was even elected. This is more of the same old same old now, which has become expected SOP, and sadly to say it's not only accepted, but encouraged. The knives are just sharper now because the Left realizes ...
"There's nothing to stop us!"
The strategy is to keep Trump out of office, and to discourage any others who won't play ball by destroying Trump. This is just another tactic.
democratics bringing a knife to a gunfight...
-Imp
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 8:21 am
by Walker
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 12:57 amAbout the Kangaroo Court, in capital letters.
Here's an explanation of the Kangaroo Court.
Now, this is an impressive woman.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAxWVAOGwfY
Passion, intelligence, beauty, strength, fired-up ... for real entertaining.
VT wrote:He kept me entertained for four years and I could do with another four.
Although not Trump, she is worthy to speak for Trump. Why isn't she all over the fashion magazines? Well, why wasn't Melania? (biased media)
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 12:55 pm
by Sculptor
Walker wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 8:21 am
Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 12:57 amAbout the Kangaroo Court, in capital letters.
Here's an explanation of the Kangaroo Court.
Now, this is an impressive woman.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAxWVAOGwfY
Passion, intelligence, beauty, strength, fired-up ... for real entertaining.
She's only in it for the money.
No decent responsible, professional lawyer would have told Trump to persue this slam-dunk.
THe more you post the more stupid you appear.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 1:13 pm
by FlashDangerpants
She's the one who just said "no objection" a bunch of times when the prosecution admitted evidence into the record because that's what she'd heard real lawyers say, but without understanding that she was cutting off her own client's avenues of appeal.
If she had been defending him in one of his many criminal cases everyone would accuse her of setting up an appeal on grounds of innefective counsel, but there is no such grounds in civil cases, a fact she may or may not be aware of.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:27 pm
by FlashDangerpants
Holy shit Walker, your endorsement really is the kiss of death.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:38 pm
by promethean75
I don't see what the problem is. Everything ended well i thought. Trump got to maintain the alpha male image he tries to portray by surrounding himself with sexy women (who are eligible to be grabbed by the p*ssy), and he'll also get more votes from sympathetic voters who identify with his martydom (they too think 'the man' is out to get em becuz fighting imaginary monsters can be exciting when u aren't a real victim of the state's betrayal and have no reason to be anti-government). Also, Alina got a decent paycheck despite the loss and got to dress up and play lawyer, something she's always wanted to do since watching those prestigious lawyer movies when she was a teenager.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:48 pm
by promethean75
Oh and useless old haute bourgeois carol got enough money to keep her whole family from having to work for at least three generations.
Grandkids: Grandma Carol, what's the best thing that ever happened to us?
Carol: when trump called me a bitch.
