Philosophy Now Forum

Posted: **Sat Jul 08, 2023 5:20 pm**

This interests me:

I learned via experience that you have something in mind there that you absolutely cannot put out there in words.

There are some topics that literally cannot be discussed. That is, they are so hot, so dangerous, so consequential, that an average person learns very early never to discuss them in any but the conventional or the politically-correct way, like reading from a script.

You show yourself to be an “enforcer” of rightthink as opposed to wrongthink. You are aware what the politically correct speech is and must be, and if you discern or imagine you discern a note of deviation you can swoop down like the Thought Police and nail your victim a wall. You operate within a Stalinesque or Maoist wielding of the politically correct and with these tools you can (I mean people like you can) do tremendous harm.

You do this as you present yourself as righteous, don’t you? That is the rôle you have assumed, right? The bona fide intellectual warrior of pure and correct opinion and orientation.

Once you’ve been exposed though you become translucent. But when exposed you sense you have no alternative but to double-down on the a priori accusation. The correct thing is to see how corrupt your “thinking” is and resolve to modify your twisted methods. But you won’t. You get too much mileage from it. It’s like a drug and you an addict.

Make sense Flash?

Posted: **Sat Jul 08, 2023 5:22 pm**

I refer you to my previous statement...

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2023 2:31 pm The rest of the post is banal pseudiferous tripe of the sort you will post every day from now until your death, and so there's no real reason to suddenly care about it today.

Posted: **Sat Jul 08, 2023 6:48 pm**

Sure, I reckon that can work sufficiently for you. But it’s pretty transparent.

And that points up another aspect of your rhetorical tactics. Since you have no coherent response to a sound and thoughtful criticism of your absurd, underhanded games, send up a decoy and attempt to dismiss absolutely any soundness to your “Nazi” opponents presentation of ideas. After all such a one, a priori, has no possible base from which to argue truthfully.

Again, I just want to expose to the light of day how these games are played.

And the larger topic is still there, undiscussed. Because your primary effort is to be sure to inhibit that from happening.

If you had to participate in a genuine conversation, you’d lose.

That is your intention. And by “you” I refer to a significant multitude and to a common disease.

Posted: **Sat Jul 08, 2023 6:54 pm**

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2023 9:16 am Here is the crux of the matter thus far:

Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 8:42 amWhat I'm saying is that racism is part of human nature; we are all racist to some extend. We tend not to like people who are different to ourselves. It's just that people like you try to invent rational excuses to justify your prejudice, rather than having the courage to be honest.

Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 9:11 amCan you tell me specifically what views and opinions I have about race and racism that make me a "wokie"?

I suspect you can't, and will just avoid answering the question.
You outed yourself as a wokie when you idly sat by, silent, on the issue of grown/adult men dressed in drag, going into women's restrooms, explicitly with teenage or prepubescent girls in there. Because you balk on that, I know that you, and the rest of your contingent, are full-blown American Wokies. You're part of the cult that has become endemic and proliferated throughout the West. Why are you a coward on the matter? Because you would rather spite me, than agree with whom you perceive as an enemy. And why am I an enemy? Because I made the class clown look foolish in class. Normally you bully others and turn them into the butt of your jokes—you're not used to somebody turning this around on you, and doing it better.

Now that that's out of the way...the matter of "honest racism".

If anybody pays attention to the thread carefully (as I seem to be one of a handful of people who do...have literacy skills), then you'll notice here that Hairball admits "We (Wokies) are racist", "everybody is", "rather than the courage to be honest". So this is the tacit admission from the Liberal-Left spectrum. This isn't a surprise. This isn't a shocker. Then Hairball commented something like, "but why are you (the Conservative-Right) so open and proud about it?" I can't find the exact quote after looking through a few pages. Maybe I will if this is a pressing matter. But this also exposes something very deep in these conversations. It implies that the liberal-left are in fact ashamed of their personal experiences and transgressions of "Racism", which they newspeak as "Systemic Racism".

So the Left cannot see why 'The Right' is open about their Racism (so Hairball contradicts himself, "the courage to be honest"), or moreso, "proud" about it.

Because of these admissions, a further inquiry can be leveled. Is it true what Harball implied and claimed? Maybe, maybe not.

Is "Racism" inherently wrong or immoral? What about when it's True? I suspect that double-digit IQ pooeypants, would say Yes-absolutely, it's especially racist when it's true. Thus, to a moron like him, merely making others aware of US FBI Crime Statistics, dats racis! And pointing-out BLM+Antifa riots had a net negative effect on the black community and American society in general, dats racis! And Joe Biden or Hunter Biden saying some of the most racist shit imaginable... dats not racist???

So why the double-standard? Return to my main arguments in this thread.

Because it's politically-convenient for the liberal-left-wokies, to accuse others of racism, offload their own guilt, be politically Offensive (not Defensive), and then they don't have to worry about "their own racism" because it's never an issue...for them. Why would it be? It's (morally) forgivable *edit* for them to be racist, but not the conservative-right.

Now let's watch flashpoopants do some mental backflips, wave around his illiteracy on full public display, like a July 4th Firework celebration, and see what kind of Ad Homs, emoting, we can produce??

So tell us which racisms are true please.

Posted: **Sat Jul 08, 2023 10:01 pm**

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2023 6:54 pmSo tell us which racisms are true please.

This usage of the first person plural is part of the overall rhetorical strategy.

Flash is a singular person, with his own opinions which may different from anyone else's, but with this usage he pretends to be *spokesman for a group*, and Flash makes reference to a group-person who is here, beside him, also asking these same *probing questions* and demanding answers.

The implication is that anyone who might think differently than Flash, if that person deviates from standard, acceptable, politically correct opinions, is far outside of the group's goodness, a veritable *other*.

The *other* that Flash envisions goose-steps at the drop of a hat and, naturally, listens reverently to Erika.

Posted: **Sun Jul 09, 2023 2:59 am**

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2023 10:01 pm
The *other* that Flash envisions goose-steps at the drop of a hat and, naturally, listens reverently to Erika.

You could at least have presented a better version, more like the original and not the boring crap you posted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PP8SvbK-fM4

For myself, I'm rather partial to this one...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1q-WuPU0pc

Posted: **Sun Jul 09, 2023 8:05 am**

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2023 6:54 pmSo tell us which racisms are true please.

East Asians (specifically South Koreans and Japanese) have higher average-IQ than other races (especially by mathematical education).

White males and females are more sexually desirable than other races.

Black males commit a substantially disproportionate amount of violent crimes in the United States based on their population %.

Posted: **Sun Jul 09, 2023 8:11 am**

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2023 5:00 pmI said — lo the many months! — that the Shoa and the destruction of European Jewry happened, and as our history records. I said that there are some differences in the data of these facts but generally it was as reported.

It doesn't matter.

Fundamentalist Wokies like flashpoopants are practiced in pilpuling. They have no intention of an 'honest', intellectual, reasonable, or rational debate. As he demonstrates repeatedly, he has a slew of Ad Homs, and that's "good enough" for him. This is the Liberal-Left 'Offensiveness' I referenced before. His method is to keep Conservative "Racists" on their backfeet consistently. Unfortunately for him, these Leftist-Woke slurs are losing their effectiveness as history moves toward a century away from Hitler and WWII, and the newer generations have no 'shame' about the Sins of the past. So their rhetoric is dulling and losing its decisiveness.

This is why this moron can be rebuked by counter-attacks and Ad Hom retorts, which is why I choose them. Just look at his Avatar...does this look like an image a rational, sane person would choose? Of course not.

I like to use fools like Flash as a stepping-stool in conversation. Don't pay them much heed, but use them as a stool to make your way up to any Big Guns the wokies and leftists bring out. Unfortunately for this forum, there doesn't seem to be any Leftist-intellectual heavyweights around here. So...I guess Flash will have to do for now.

Posted: **Sun Jul 09, 2023 8:44 am**

And you are a right-wing intellectual heavyweight (as if there is such a thing)? Funniest thing I've seen all day

Posted: **Sun Jul 09, 2023 9:01 am**

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 8:44 amAnd you are a right-wing intellectual heavyweight (as if there is such a thing)? Funniest thing I've seen all day

No, I'm a centrist.

Posted: **Sun Jul 09, 2023 9:12 am**

'Interesting' how idiot Americans who are constantly demonising this mythical 'left' never want to associate themselves with 'the right'

You can't have 'left' without 'right'.

Posted: **Sun Jul 09, 2023 9:48 am**

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 9:12 am'Interesting' how idiot Americans who are constantly demonising this mythical 'left' never want to associate themselves with 'the right' You can't have 'left' without 'right'.

And yet I'm still a centrist.

Posted: **Sun Jul 09, 2023 9:56 am**

'course you are..'

Posted: **Sun Jul 09, 2023 10:02 am**

Posted: **Sun Jul 09, 2023 10:20 am**

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 8:05 am
Black males commit a substantially disproportionate amount of violent crimes in the United States based on their population %.

Is that because violence and criminality are an intrinsic part of the nature of black people, or does the reason for it have something to do with the position in society black people find themselves occupying, or is there some other reason? I'm not suggesting any of those is the most likely, I have no idea, but the reason is important when it comes having the appropriate attitude towards the problem.

Philosophy Now Forum

Racism

Re: Racism

Re: Racism

Re: Racism

Re: Racism

Re: Racism

Re: Racism

Re: Racism

Re: Racism

Re: Racism

Re: Racism

Re: Racism

Re: Racism

Re: Racism

Re: Racism

Re: Racism