WHY would ANY one WANT to 'harm' 'you', "skepdick"?
Also, have 'you' considered to STOP DOING the Wrong that 'you' DO?
WHY would ANY one WANT to 'harm' 'you', "skepdick"?
Just out of curiosity, out of the following what do you think or BELIEVE is USED in the 'commission of peace'; Logic. Mathematics. Science. Philosophy. Computers. Guns?Skepdick wrote: ↑Wed May 10, 2023 8:27 amThere is no such thing as "death by gun". Guns have no causal power.attofishpi wrote: ↑Wed May 10, 2023 8:22 amHomicide? What is that...an NRA stat shitfest no doubt!!
"Long-term homicide rates across Western Europe 1250 to 2020"
Oooo nooo - 70 people per 100,000 people died (nothing to do with guns btw) back when everyone was a kunt (homicide) to present.
Now Skeppy put things into TRUE stat perspective...provide a graph of the USA deaths by guns since 1700 to present in relation to percentage of guns per population for those years.
Guns are used by humans in the commission of crimes. That's called a modus operandi.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modus_operandi
But you know what else is used in the commission of crimes? Logic. Mathematics. Science. Philosophy. Computers.
Wanna ban those?
Okay. There MUST BE some 'thing' TERRIBLY WRONG with 'you' IF there are ALL SORTS OF REASONS WHY 'we' would WANT to 'harm' 'you'.
Are 'you' TRYING TO' suggest here that the ONLY Wrong that 'you' DO is just 'exist'?
The exact same tools.
Do 'you' REALLY BELIEVE that the MORE guns that are ADDED into a society, like in that country called "united states of america" for example, then the LESS DEATHS from guns will occur?Skepdick wrote: ↑Wed May 10, 2023 8:39 amThat would be a really stupid graph and a really vicious tautology.attofishpi wrote: ↑Wed May 10, 2023 8:22 am Now Skeppy put things into TRUE stat perspective...provide a graph of the USA deaths by guns since 1700 to present in relation to percentage of guns per population for those years.
I don't really care whether 100% of deaths are "gun deaths"; or "knife deaths"; or "baseball bat deaths" if the murder rate halves as gun, knife and baseball bat ownership increases..
Don't care whether less or more deaths occur "from guns".
This thread WILL SHOW and thus PROVIDE LIVING PROOF of 'confirmation bias' AT WORK, and of EXACTLY HOW people, in the days when this was being written, WILL SAY just about absolutely ANY 'thing' when 'TRYING TO' back up and support what they ALREADY BELIEVE is true and/or HAVE BEEN INDOCTRINATED TO BELIEVE is true.
Ukraine. Today. And for the last 14 months.
No of course why not just have a tank, rocket granade or poison dart?henry quirk wrote: ↑Wed May 10, 2023 3:03 pmSo, an innocent person, one who has done no wrong, has to give up his property becuz you feel his ownership of that property makes you unsafe?commonsense wrote: ↑Wed May 10, 2023 2:59 pmYes, as a matter of public safety Z will have to surrender guns.henry quirk wrote: ↑Wed May 10, 2023 12:56 pm So, to protect B from A, Z, who has done no wrong, is penalized, yes?
CA064187-8C8C-45EE-8F07-5D3F192E5625.png
Ah okay, now we are getting somewhere.
Which HELPS in WANTING to OWN a(nother) gun.
LOL WELL 'you' ARE GOING TO what is called DIE "skepdick". NO matter what you WANT, WISH, or DESIRE.
LOL
Well, OBVIOUSLY, then 'you' best find a way to get "yourself" access to the BIGGEST WEAPON OF DESTRUCTION, right?
You should call Putin and explain your logic to him.Age wrote: ↑Wed May 10, 2023 3:51 pm ALSO, can 'you' REALLY NOT SEE just how Truly STUPID, IDIOTIC, and ILLOGICAL 'that' IS what you just SAID and CLAIMED here?
If you, REALLY, can NOT, then just let us KNOW, and we can SHOW you, that is; if you, REALLY, would LIKE to LEARN and SEE WHERE, and HOW, EXACTLY.