Page 11 of 24
Re: ~ The Case For Socialism ~
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:08 pm
by mcg265
Communitarian philosophy is based upon the belief that a person's social identity and personality are largely molded by community relationships : with a smaller degree of development being placed on individualism.
One good thing about Capitalism is that it does not say anything about how people should live, what their identity is or what is good for them. There are many co-operatives and communes within the Capitalist societies where people who want this kind of living can go.
Re:
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 9:23 pm
by SpheresOfBalance
henry quirk wrote:"(the) glittering prize" for the communitarian is 'from each according to ability, to each according to need'.
For a small few, howver, the prize is being 'left alone', sumthin' communitarians (be they on the Left or Right) don't understand and cannot allow.
HQ, we have that in common, being left alone that is, it's my preference, unless on occasion I 'feel' like sharing.
That's the problem with defining concepts in concrete terms. As if any one word can truthfully encapsulate potentially billions of constituents. In truth it's impossible. Human ways of being is actually only ever evolving, and as such any concepts used to define it must be aqueous in nature, just like our evolution, otherwise they contain no conceptual truth for their ever varying subjects!
Re: Re:
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:06 pm
by SpheresOfBalance
Impenitent wrote:uwot wrote:Impenitent wrote:no one ever does time for tax evasion...
-Imp
If paying tax bothers you, you are free to go and live in the hills or on the street, but if you want to take advantage of the infrastructure and services that others provide, they are entitled to charge you; even if, like workers in health, education, law enforcement, defence, civic planning and construction, etc, they do this by proxy.
Neither the US nor the UK have agencies that will force you to abide by their demands
entitled to charge you by force... and don't worry, there is not a square inch of "un-owned" land that you are "free" to occupy
-Imp
Yes Imp, that's my rub too!
All we have to ask ourselves is how all the land got owned in the first place, and in every case in the beginning it was stolen from all the rest, till death did they part or for their fear did they sink into the dark recesses of slavery. The English story I love so well because I know it so well, and of course the Americans chose the same 'basic' example being children of the Brits. Steal it for a 'king' with swords, maces, pikes, mail. And once the opposition are all dead, give it to all your 'lords' and 'dukes,' that were especially instrumental in your getting it, until it's all gone, then tell the 'peasants,' in so many words, to either leave or that they can stay and farm some of it as long as they 'give freely,' the portion needed to sustain the land 'thieves.'
Make no mistake, all land that is said to be owned, was stolen from all those equally deserving to share it, making them slaves to their life's needs, due to those that are the most fearful of us all, thus the most psychotic, such that they believe, though they don't/didn't even know it, that power through killing and stealing somehow might allow them to cheat their greatest fear. It their psychosis, they'd became what it was they feared, contradictory? Most definitely! But you can't talk sense to the insane! Maybe today, definitely tomorrow, those conquers of yesteryear, if doing their deeds in these more modern times, would be locked up in an asylum where they actually belong.
Re: ~ The Case For Socialism ~
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:22 pm
by henry quirk
SoB,
I understand shifty and shfiting culural norms, but I don't 'shift', can't 'go with the flow'. I'm not lookin' to set old ladies' blue hair on fire, or serve up child gumbo for supper, or marry a billy goat. I'm boring and conventional in the extreme. I just wanna be left alone.
I get that people, over the long haul, are evolving into 'homo connectus', each and every one linked to each and every other, and I get that most folks think this is a good thing.
I don't...no profit for me to pretend otherwise.
And I understand I'm on the losing side. Folks like Bill win. They'll get their global communitarian utopia (if the wahhabists don't beat 'em to the punch), not as quickly as they like, but a helluva lot faster than I like.
#
mcg,
More accurately, the marketplace (open, lightly arbitrated, no favorites picked from on high) imposes no value, no philosophy (it does exclude certain values, certain philosophies, but this is negation, not imposition). The market (nuthin' more than the countless transactions of, between, and among individuals) favors the idiosyncratic pursuit, favors the individual. Capitalism, by defintion, favors the capital. I understand the leftist complaints about Capitalsm, but the market and Capitalism are not synonomous, and I wish they'd stop cramming the two together.
Re: ~ The Case For Socialism ~
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:25 pm
by SpheresOfBalance
Obvious Leo wrote:uwot wrote:
Do you mean me? Do you know of any major party, in any developed democracy that is advocating that?
Henry is trapped in a time warp, as are many of his countrymen. Applying 19th century labels to 21st century systems of political thought does not make for a good understanding of the general principles under discussion.
That people develop new terms to speak of age old shit, doesn't make them any less foul. As it's all designed to brainwash the slaves so those in power can easily maintain it. Did you not go to university? If so maybe you weren't so lucky as I, in having professors more concerned with truth than money making opportunities.
They explained that the Romans in power, had free bread thrown to the gladiator spectators, and gave free basic dwellings in order to 'buy' their allegiance, to keep them happy, so as to maintain their power. Flash forward! A much more refined version, even seemingly more hidden! The words one uses to define, part of the plan, the insurance to serve their fear laden greed in power!
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:33 pm
by henry quirk
SoB,
Land ownership is a tricky thing. I can pick myself up and go wherever my legs can take me. In a real sense, I am my first, best property which I cannot be parted from. Ten acres of land is another matter...possession of it is highly dependent on the kinds of shifty and shifting norms I mention in the post above. Even my shotgun, a thing distinct from me, is more easily defended as 'mine' simply cuz I can pick it up and carry it along as I trundle from here to there. Just not feasible to haul mega tonnage of soil around.
This is why I (currently) rent...

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:39 pm
by henry quirk
SoB,
"new terms to speak of age old shit"
Exactly right.
A whore in new clothes is still a whore.
Re: ~ The Case For Socialism ~
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:44 pm
by Bill Wiltrack
.
In this new emerging reality, this digital revolution, no one wants to own anything...and that's a good thing.
Vehicles - Don't want to own - we got uber & driver-less electric vehicles at our disposal.
Homes - who wants to own when life circumstances change so quickly in this digital age.
From clothing to household items - who wants to own when you can make whatever you want with a 3D printer. Then melt & remake into another item.
#1 - We have entered already into a digital revolution. Part of the premise of this exciting time is that information is the new currency; the new capital. So - information capital is a benchmark for now and into the foreseeable future. So nothing of value will belong to anyone in particular.
#2 - Most every individual is now supported by public expense. And this trend will only continue and accelerate as the end of work becomes more and more common because of advances in technology.
#3 - Every citizen makes his own contribution to society according to their own ability right now.
***LIFE PRO TIP - Capitalism is the fastest path to Socialism.
.
Re: ~ The Case For Socialism ~
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:52 pm
by SpheresOfBalance
mcg265 wrote:Communitarian philosophy is based upon the belief that a person's social identity and personality are largely molded by community relationships : with a smaller degree of development being placed on individualism.
One good thing about Capitalism is that it does not say anything about how people should live,
Bullshit! You're a fool that's been bought and sold. Very typical indeed in a capitalist society.
Watch zeitgeist to open your eyes.
Keep in mind as you watch, that at least in the USA, the law states that every merchant 'must' accept dollars for payment. And I bet every country has a similar law on the books.
what their identity is or what is good for them. There are many co-operatives and communes
Communes??? I only ever want to commune with nature, which capitalist societies are killing! Because the idiots only ever ask if they can, never whether they should. They are a menace to the symbiotic biosphere! On which all our lives, by the way, depend. They are just far to blinded by the glittering prize to see, they build their undeniable demise, fools them all!
within the Capitalist societies where people who want this kind of living can go.
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:54 pm
by henry quirk
Yeah, Bill, we get it: 'yay socialism!'

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:02 pm
by henry quirk
SoB,
http://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/currency_12772.htm
Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled "Legal tender," states: "United States coins and currency [including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks] are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues."
This statute means that all United States money as identified above is a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor. There is, however, no Federal statute mandating that a private business, a person, or an organization must accept currency or coins as payment for goods or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether to accept cash unless there is a state law which says otherwise.
Re: ~ The Case For Socialism ~
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:09 pm
by SpheresOfBalance
henry quirk wrote:SoB,
I understand shifty and shfiting culural norms, but I don't 'shift', can't 'go with the flow'. I'm not lookin' to set old ladies' blue hair on fire, or serve up child gumbo for supper, or marry a billy goat. I'm boring and conventional in the extreme. I just wanna be left alone.
I get that people, over the long haul, are evolving into 'homo connectus', each and every one linked to each and every other, and I get that most folks think this is a good thing.
I don't...no profit for me to pretend otherwise.
And I understand I'm on the losing side. Folks like Bill win. They'll get their global communitarian utopia (if the wahhabists don't beat 'em to the punch), not as quickly as they like, but a helluva lot faster than I like.
HQ, you didn't understand my point at all, as it was all in your favor! Let me put it in other words, so maybe you'll understand, "there is no universal rule book, that says how we must live. The rule book is all mans selfish bullshit, that goes any further than, the only thing one can't do is fuck with another's world, as long as it's not fucking with another's world. And there's how you allow for everyone's world." Yours included HQ!
#
mcg,
More accurately, the marketplace (open, lightly arbitrated, no favorites picked from on high) imposes no value, no philosophy (it does exclude certain values, certain philosophies, but this is negation, not imposition). The market (nuthin' more than the countless transactions of, between, and among individuals) favors the idiosyncratic pursuit, favors the individual. Capitalism, by defintion, favors the capital. I understand the leftist complaints about Capitalsm, but the market and Capitalism are not synonomous, and I wish they'd stop cramming the two together.
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:14 pm
by henry quirk
SoB,
I did understand your point and I agree with it...I was just sayin' I can live and let live but the communitarians can't and won't.
Re:
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:27 pm
by SpheresOfBalance
henry quirk wrote:SoB,
Land ownership is a tricky thing. I can pick myself up and go wherever my legs can take me.
And then as you trespass on 'my' land with a shotgun I can kill you with my minigun, because you were threatening me with your shotgun. And you surely can't farm 'my' land, to sustain your life, so where can you go to actually live freely? All the land is owned in the same way, your death being, as good as, assured, you with your shotgun in hand. They not fearing any repercussions, as you trespassing, laying there, with shotgun in hand, speaks volumes of the intent of a dead man, as you then can't say a word! Which is what I meant, only that amount of land that is needed for a family to sustain itself, should be allowed to be owned. And that it's cost should be as free as your birthright!
In a real sense, I am my first, best property which I cannot be parted from. Ten acres of land is another matter...possession of it is highly dependent on the kinds of shifty and shifting norms I mention in the post above. Even my shotgun, a thing distinct from me, is more easily defended as 'mine' simply cuz I can pick it up and carry it along as I trundle from here to there. Just not feasible to haul mega tonnage of soil around.
This is why I (currently) rent...

Re: ~ The Case For Socialism ~
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:44 pm
by SpheresOfBalance
Bill Wiltrack wrote:.
In this new emerging reality, this digital revolution, no one wants to own anything...and that's a good thing.
Vehicles - Don't want to own - we got uber & driver-less electric vehicles at our disposal.
Homes - who wants to own when life circumstances change so quickly in this digital age.
From clothing to household items - who wants to own when you can make whatever you want with a 3D printer. Then melt & remake into another item.
#1 - We have entered already into a digital revolution. Part of the premise of this exciting time is that information is the new currency; the new capital. So - information capital is a benchmark for now and into the foreseeable future. So nothing of value will belong to anyone in particular.
#2 - Most every individual is now supported by public expense. And this trend will only continue and accelerate as the end of work becomes more and more common because of advances in technology.
#3 - Every citizen makes his own contribution to society according to their own ability right now.
***LIFE PRO TIP - Capitalism is the fastest path to Socialism.
.
IMHO, a bit of scifi there Bill, but OK. I admit, that 'might' be nice for some. I too look to what we could be, given enough time!