Hobbes' Choice wrote:SpheresOfBalance wrote:There is no 'meaning of life,' except that which is in your mind for yours. It's a human construct often used to force ones opinions upon others. Ones meaning is theirs alone, only to be seriously considered by the one that 'creates' it.
)
At last you are learning. You have proven yourself capable of changing your mind and absorbing some ideas from the Forum.
Well done.
I've never changed my mind on this topic, so what you're up about, is a mystery. You might be getting confused as to the difference between my various points of views that I reflect upon, posing any particular one, at any particular time. As in the past you surely have seemed to be, confused that is!
There is the general humanistic point of view, as well as plethora specific individual views. Then there is the largest of them all, encompassing all of humanity, that of the universal view, it is singular, massive and specific. Perspective is everything, and there are many to consider. I never look at things simplemindedly like some people here. Most of the time I'm far too deep for most here, evidenced by them not understanding, much to my surprise, but most importantly, "myself." Because my musings don't make my life easier, rather much harder, and I could do without the stress, but such is the gravity of the universal perspective. The more I pursue, the larger it becomes, obviously many, many lifetimes in size much like it's physicality. The humans of our planet have only scratched the surface, we are far too young, such that even though I understand the many facets of this fact, relatively giving me a leg up, it's still far to large for me to conquer, obviously, I'm just one human, with all the flaws that are intrinsically human, at this particular point of our evolution!
So what you really should have done, instead of acting as though you've known something, that I've just found, was to ask me from which perspective my words emanated. Because one of the many human flaws is that often they 'believe' they've found a singular answer, only, after much reflection (time on earth), to find another and then another, but then the really slow ones never do, hanging on to the first, their minds closed, not comprehending the immensity of the largest part of it all, their own psyches. I see that psyche and philosophy go hand in hand. That knowledge hides behind the limits of ones psyche, obscuring it's understanding. Such that for one to be the truest philosopher, they must first understand themselves completely, which is almost unheard of, as even that understanding takes many many years to unravel. Of course all the while that you consider my words, keep in mind that I firmly believe this to be true relative to our species current age, and expect that with our further evolution, we shall start our lives clearer of flawed influence, as unlike your thoughts on the matter, I know that with our evolution our humane properties increase. We become more and more human as we learn more and more of our flaws.
So I believe you should reconsider your initial understanding of my words, to which you responded. I have not been here long enough, or written enough words for anyone here to understand me, because they haven't yet understood themselves, let alone a stranger on an Internet forum. My thinking is more complex than many believe, us infants are still working on us, at least the brighter ones are! I'll learn about me until I die!
Have the scientists nailed down the human brain and consciousness yet? Exactly the point. When they finally do, humanity will have taken the very first step out of their infancy, into toddler-hood, in terms of understanding themselves, such that then everything else shall start becoming much definitely clearer!
Remember my favorite quote: 'I only know that I know nothing.' --Socrates--