Philosophy Now Forum

artisticsolution wrote:What makes prostitution more dangerous for women than other careers?

Bill Wiltrack wrote:.



Actually no. It took me less than one second and there were about 5,000 sources.




.

artisticsolution wrote:...
The fact is, sex is sex whether it is done in exchange for money or 'love'.

Arising_uk wrote:

artisticsolution wrote:...
The fact is, sex is sex whether it is done in exchange for money or 'love'.

Nah! The experience is and should be much different.

bobevenson wrote:

artisticsolution wrote:What makes prostitution more dangerous for women than other careers?

It's hard to get chlamydia from a computer terminal.

bobevenson wrote:

artisticsolution wrote:What makes prostitution more dangerous for women than other careers?

It's hard to get chlamydia from a computer terminal.

Arising_uk wrote:

artisticsolution wrote:...
The fact is, sex is sex whether it is done in exchange for money or 'love'.

Nah! The experience is and should be much different.

artisticsolution wrote:It's not all about you.

"You miss my point, no, you misunderstand, there you go, like some of the others, making assumptions, merely because of omisssion.

And if I said that your foolhardiness was delightful???"

bobevenson wrote:Definitely, when it's done in exchange for money, you don't have to put up with, "When are you going to call me?" or "Is this all you ever think of?"

artisticsolution wrote:Do tell.

No, you misunderstood, I was not referring to the way things have been, i.e., illegal underground brothels, and only used the word brothel so as to be brief, as I tend to be long winded. What I meant was government regulated "brothels" where mandatory STD screening, was employed as well as having staff that was responsible for ensuring the peace and safety of both the pros and johns. Remember that prostitution outside one of these regulated brothels would be illegal. I see that it would catch on. I mean really, would you rather buy a product from a nice, clean brightly lit retail outlet or from a shady individual in a dark alley, from the back of his van? Most would choose the former, otherwise there would be a hell of a lot more of the latter. A john would choose the retail outlet, believing it to be safer, in all respects, and so would the smart pros. And as far as profits go, it would be no different than someone working for a company, versus owning their own company. Legitimate business's always have overhead that includes a lease, utilities, security, etc. The pros would not have to worry about such things, just show up to work and do their job, all else is handled by the regulated property/business owner. Further their license could be revoked is they flunked too many random inspections or after so many police reports/incidents. I'm sure everyone would behave to reap the rewards that such a clean, healthy, safe environment could afford. Look to the USA's Chicken Ranch in Nevada or the Brothels in Amsterdam as examples. Though I see it as being even better.

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Definitely, when it's done in exchange for money, you don't have to put up with, "When are you going to call me?" or "Is this all you ever think of?"

Your American women sound horrendous.

bobevenson wrote:No, they've just got a warped mentality imported from England.