Philosophy Now Forum

reasonvemotion wrote:

In fact intelligence is this finding of patterns which can preempt events

My question then is, where do revelations of future events fit in. There are many people who have dreams for example, of an event before it actually happens and they are accurate. Science cannot explain everything we observe or how we came to be here. It can't really tell us about the origin of the universe in a way that we have proof of how life came into being. Science cannot explain how it came about that a huge amount of information was encoded in DNA. It (science) has no explanation for the experience of concsciousness.

If there were explanations to these unanswered questions, what if we did know, what would life be like with this knowledge.

We would cease to exist?

Oh jeez...the paranormal.

Listen...some idiots have dreams....all the time. The ones that somehow resemble what happens they remember.
They forget about the 99% that resulted in nothing...but that 1% that sort of resembles an event that happened afterwards, they cling unto.

Here's another reason:
Sensual stimulation, information, bombards our senses daily and constantly,. Little of it registers consciously.
The rest dissipates or is stored in the subconscious memory.
Later it is process with what we call dreaming.
In sleep the mind processes information. Some people can sleep on a problem and wake up with a solution.
This unprocessed information is relevant as it might point to a possible outcome.
For instance, I register a slight color variation in a friends skin tone or a slight limp or something subtle like that.
The information is not processed but it is dreamed of later that night and the solution is that the friend might be ill. The next day or the next week our friend dies or goes to the hospital.
We recall the dream as a premonition.
Women are prone to this because of what we call female intuition. Their lower processing abilities makes their sensual awareness intuitive or unconscious...like when you meet someone and you do not know why but he creeps you out. You do not know why but you feel it.

See?

I do. Which leads me to another question, which I will post in Metaphysics as it is deemed more suitable in that location.

Satyr wrote:

reasonvemotion wrote:

In fact intelligence is this finding of patterns which can preempt events

My question then is, where do revelations of future events fit in. There are many people who have dreams for example, of an event before it actually happens and they are accurate. Science cannot explain everything we observe or how we came to be here. It can't really tell us about the origin of the universe in a way that we have proof of how life came into being. Science cannot explain how it came about that a huge amount of information was encoded in DNA. It (science) has no explanation for the experience of concsciousness.

If there were explanations to these unanswered questions, what if we did know, what would life be like with this knowledge.

We would cease to exist?

Oh jeez...the paranormal.

Listen...some idiots have dreams....all the time. The ones that somehow resemble what happens they remember.
They forget about the 99% that resulted in nothing...but that 1% that sort of resembles an event that happened afterwards, they cling unto.

Here's another reason:
Sensual stimulation, information, bombards our senses daily and constantly,. Little of it registers consciously.
The rest dissipates or is stored in the subconscious memory.
Later it is process with what we call dreaming.
In sleep the mind processes information. Some people can sleep on a problem and wake up with a solution.
This unprocessed information is relevant as it might point to a possible outcome.
For instance, I register a slight color variation in a friends skin tone or a slight limp or something subtle like that.
The information is not processed but it is dreamed of later that night and the solution is that the friend might be ill. The next day or the next week our friend dies or goes to the hospital.
We recall the dream as a premonition.
Women are prone to this because of what we call female intuition. Their lower processing abilities makes their sensual awareness intuitive or unconscious...like when you meet someone and you do not know why but he creeps you out. You do not know why but you feel it.

See?

'Their lower processing abilities..blah, blah, blah......' Where is your evidence?

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: 'Their lower processing abilities..blah, blah, blah......' Where is your evidence?

Satyr doesn't rely on evidence, he asserts it and it is so, just as if I say it, it must be so, just because. You ask for evidence, logic, or reason from Satyr, you are asking for the impossible.

"Give me evidence that I am a moron", says the moron, as if he/she is important enough to convince of a basic truth.
The problem of belief, for genetic feces, is that no amount of scientific "evidence" will yet confirm the fact, that they are truly a moron.

Even an overwhelming consensus, an uncontested popular vote, cannot convince a moron that he is a moron.
A moron claims to need "scientific evidence" to believe, meanwhile maintaining an absolutely anti-scientific mentality.

Kuznetzova wrote:

Kuznetzova = yet another fruitcake from "dissidentphilosophy" ..better look him up in the sex offenders registry.

thedoc wrote:

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: 'Their lower processing abilities..blah, blah, blah......' Where is your evidence?

Satyr doesn't rely on evidence, he asserts it and it is so, just as if I say it, it must be so, just because. You ask for evidence, logic, or reason from Satyr, you are asking for the impossible.

God cares about you....you need no evidence.

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
'Their lower processing abilities..blah, blah, blah......' Where is your evidence?

I give you a theory on how the paranormal bullshit works.

The extraordinary is easy, woman.
I rely on the more earthly possibilities...not spirits and ghosts and telepathy.

I use my experience with people and nature and I deduce explanations.
I do not go to the invisible, the beyond, the supernatural.

Some years ago it was discovered that human DNA has a high mutation rate and is deteriorating at an alarming rate.
This means that if humans and their ancestors had existed for as long as evolutionists claim, we should have degenerated to the point of extinction long ago. Calculations based on the accumulation of detrimental mutations in just the mitochondrial DNA genome alone suggest that the evolutionary ancestral line leading to humans would have become extinct after 20 millions years.

Mutations Galore, T Beardsley
Quantifying the Genomic Decay Paradox L Loewe

What is observed in research laboratories today is DNA slowly deteriorating, not new DNA evolving. This means we actually observe the very opposite of evolution.

John Sanford Genetic Entrophy

reasonvemotion wrote:Some years ago it was discovered that human DNA has a high mutation rate and is deteriorating at an alarming rate.
This means that if humans and their ancestors had existed for as long as evolutionists claim, we should have degenerated to the point of extinction long ago. Calculations based on the accumulation of detrimental mutations in just the mitochondrial DNA genome alone suggest that the evolutionary ancestral line leading to humans would have become extinct after 20 millions years.

Mutations Galore, T Beardsley
Quantifying the Genomic Decay Paradox L Loewe

What is observed in research laboratories today is DNA slowly deteriorating, not new DNA evolving. This means we actually observe the very opposite of evolution.

John Sanford Genetic Entrophy

So four-plus billion years isn't long enough but six thousand years is?

It is foolhardy to discount the evidence that science is rapidly discovering and discounting many things, that have been hidden or accepted for hundreds of years. Many areas of physics, biology and others, have caused scientists to question Darwin's theory and the evidence which supposedly supports it. The public have been told that all evidence up to date supports Darwin's theory and this is simply not true.

To ignore new scientific discovery is similar to still believing the earth is flat.

Some people, like chazzy, are like those douche-bags who posture with talk about what belts they own in the martial arts or how many Dans they were given or how many children they've taught...yet they run away when they are asked to show their training and knowledge in real time, in real life....to show how it is applied.

Morons who were given license to milk the myriads of needy fucks out there and make a career out of regurgitating bullshit.

Does a philosophy professor practice philosophy or does he teach those whoa re incapable of practicing philosophy, one of which he is, what those who did practice philosophy thought?
Is an art teacher an artist or one who knows about artists and their history and their biography and can describe their works by memory?
Is talking about thinking thinking?

I'm a poor Satyr visiting here from Hyperborea, seeking knowledge into these human methods.

Can anybody help me?

When one constructs a theory, trying to explain a phenomenon, one seeks guidance in the past: experience and knowledge.

In other words, all explanations must be natural.

Seeking explanation in the unnatural, the supernatural, is a dishonest method of avoiding reality and trying to find an escape form it.
It is also the easiest.
If we explain fire as spirits dancing we fail to delve into nature and her processes, offering us insights that may provide us with a future advantage.

The present one, for example, the Judeo-Christian one, now called Marxism, or secular humanism, or progressiveness, or liberalism, is an ideal which teaches the mind to hate itself, nature and the world, to feel ashamed of its past, to seek to forget what it is and from where it came from.

Can you elaborate more on the bold text?