Re: Separate tables at McDonalds
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:12 am
Yes the perfect trio; milk porridge and honey.reasonvemotion wrote:well........ organic honey?
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Yes the perfect trio; milk porridge and honey.reasonvemotion wrote:well........ organic honey?
http://www.dwp.gov.uk/pension-credit-toolkit/ wrote:Around one in five pensioners gets Pension Credit. But up to 1.6 million people are still missing out…
Prices in Norway are pretty high though.reasonvemotion wrote:Seems like Norway is the most generous.
And yet we live in an age where the planet's economy is based on models that assume people act rationally.ForgedinHell wrote:Poor people don't always make the rational choice in their situation.
Yes, socialist economists do make the mistake of thinking that their planning and socialist schemes are rational.John wrote:And yet we live in an age where the planet's economy is based on models that assume people act rationally.ForgedinHell wrote:Poor people don't always make the rational choice in their situation.
And it's not just poor people that don't always act rationally.
So classical liberal economics doesn't rely on models based on rational actors?ForgedinHell wrote:Yes, socialist economists do make the mistake of thinking that their planning and socialist schemes are rational.John wrote:And yet we live in an age where the planet's economy is based on models that assume people act rationally.ForgedinHell wrote:Poor people don't always make the rational choice in their situation.
And it's not just poor people that don't always act rationally.
No. The classical beliefs would be present even if people acted irrationally, because the classic choice is that people making mistakes as individuals is still preferable to people making mistakes through government coercion.John wrote: So classical liberal economics doesn't rely on models based on rational actors?
Indeed it does, That's why they are all wrong.John wrote:So classical liberal economics doesn't rely on models based on rational actors?ForgedinHell wrote:Yes, socialist economists do make the mistake of thinking that their planning and socialist schemes are rational.John wrote:
And yet we live in an age where the planet's economy is based on models that assume people act rationally.
And it's not just poor people that don't always act rationally.