ArtsyFartsy wrote:All I am hearing from you is "whine,whine...cry, cry".
No, **** saying "It's going to rain tomorrow" does not constitute a complaint.
Saying "Cows eat grass and expel methane" is not whining.
Saying "Lions eat flesh and they might eat man-flesh" is not bitching.
ArtsyFartsy wrote:Has it not dawned on you why on earth something as 'supposedly' strong as the 'alpha male' could ever allow his house to become something he does not like?
Two things
Fartsy...
first: who said I was an "alpha" or a male at all? and
second: who said I do not like it?
Fartsy, saying
apes are inferior to humans is not complaining about apes. It might be a message to those humans who might associate themselves with apes.
You can fuck gorillas, niggers, donkeys...I really do not care, because YOU are not my intended audience. You are the
manimal I use to get to my intended audience.
I'm not here to change anything. I am here to use your attacks as a motive to expand upon my ideas.
I,
Farsty, analyze the environment, distinguish what creatures and plants (mainly vegetables) can be found in it, and then I seek my own kind within it.
I do not complain about it, nor do I want to change it.
In fact changing it would go against my interests for it would force me to reevaluate and adjust myself to the new. No,
Farsty, I want you to stay as bovine as you are.
I want the cattle you call "human" to remain s they are and I want you all to have many, many, calf. I am only interested in those few who can actually rise above the cattle herd and be part of humanity.
I want to address those who can distinguish and discriminate, and not feel ashamed about it.
I have no interest in you, as an individual,
Fartsy. You are simple and stupid and dull. The only thing that makes you interesting is that you are apart of a growing herd of mediocrity which confronts my own well-being.
You are like a cow amongst a stampeding herd of cows, coming my way - nothing more, nothing less.
ArtsyFartsy wrote:He's the 'alpha male' for Christ sake! This world should be the way he says it should be. But it isn't...according to you. According to you, the alpha male has been taken over by a weaker more feminine kind of individual. Now how is that possible?
No
Fartsy, what I am saying is that the definition of "alpha" or superior human, have been turned on its head by a system that needs to produce, en masse, docile, effete, tolerant, undiscriminating, unthinking, manimals....and females, like you, are its means towards that end. Because where pussy goes these sexually obsessed, primitive, manimals go.
Fartsy, remember the passage in the Bible about the 'meek inheriting the earth'? That's part of it. The meek, the inferior, the stupid, the base, the primal, now present themselves as "the future", progressive, superior...ideal.
It's nihilism,
Fartsy...that's what it does: it inverts concepts from their natural definitions to human or to a particular kind of human ideals, with particular motives.
Now,
Fartsy, in modernity in the west, to be dumb is to be smart; to be weak is to be strong; to hate life is to love life; to be anti-nature is to be pro-nature; to be woman is to be man and to be man is to be woman; to be other than is to be the same; to be an individual is to be like everyone else; war is peace; surrender is conquest; to be many is to be one; to be imperfect is to be perfect; to be mortal is to be immortal... and so on and so on.
\
In natural settings,
Fartsy, there is no debate over ideals, no "rights", no "justice"; there is no ambiguity or reversal of hierarchies.
Nature does not give a shit about your sense fo justice, ****.
If you are dumb and weak you face the consequences with no judge or jury.
The "alpha-male" has been abstracted
Fartsy, just like resources have been abstracted into codified monetary units that can be bought and sold but represent nothing but stale air full of mind-farts, like yours.
Now, we might get into how and why and for what reason or into whom lies behind it, but this is a step genetic garbage, like you, need not take at this junction...or ever.
That, next step, I reserve to the few who actually understand what I'm saying.
So,
Farsty, when masculinity has been abstracted into an institution (State, Church, Law, Ideal) all can rise to the privileged position of being representations of this abstraction. We get women, faggots, children, becoming representations, or corporeal symbols, of an abstracted masculinity.
A child can be Emperor.
Following so far
Farstsy?
No?
Too bad...but this is not intended for you. I am using you to address others.
Thanks for the opportunity, by the way...you've been a helpful cow.
Back on-topic:
So....when this happens, over time and through hundreds of years of social manipulation, domestication, institutionalization...call it whatever you like...using the usual methods of "education" - also called training or indoctrination) peer pressure, religion/spirituality, socialization, all biological males are forced into subordinate positions of 'beta-males'.
Now, ****, beta-males in the wild have particular psychologies - some experience
a drop in testosterone, which might explain lower sperm-counts or virility, particularly amongst the higher more sophisticated bloodlines, like Asian and Europeans, and less so with the more primal Negroes - and they take-on the typical primate beta-male strategies to compensate for their lowered status.
This is a form of
emasculation.
I call it "feminization" and I've written a short essay {
The Feminization of Man}on it, which I am expanding upon presently.
ArtsyFartsy wrote:Now any person with half a brain would ask themselves, "Now why is that? Why do we not allow the 'alpha male' to be the 'alpha male' and lead the pack?
A person with "half a brain" would ask that and the answer would be obvious. But you are not someone with "half a brain" or any discernible brain above the required to eat, sleep, shit and fornicate.
But thanks for asking, for all the less developed younger brains out there....which you, despite your age, can count yourself amongst.
Now think, if you can,
Farsty: How many dominant males does one group have in the wild?
Amongst some species, (wolves, dogs, chimpanzees) where males are permitted to remain in the troop under the dominance of a single male...it is ONE. In other species (lions, elephants) the excess males are driven off...because there can only be ONE.
Get it from where monism takes its singular
God from?
No,
Farsty?
Never-mind...I proceed.
So, there can only be
ONE dominant masculine entity, no? Otherwise internal strife would tear the group apart...also explaining why the nuclear family was torn apart.
Also explaining why males had to be integrated into the social fabric by restricting female sexual choice:
Paternalism, you dumb ****.
In the old days the institution, the abstracted masculine entity (King, Emperor, Pope) was dependent, you dumb ****, upon masculine energies (creativity, muscle, the warrior spirit) to preserve itself and to grow. also, in those times, these unities, of State, Church, Nation, Empire, were more homogeneous, genetically...making every biological male genetically linked to the leader or the abstracted masculine entity. Today the unities are heterogeneous, forcing a lowering of identification to a lowest common link. See, how in your mind-set, ****, it is the generalization (far more general than any racial designation) of
Humanity, which is the binding, common identifying marker. This is why more refined, more precise, less general, more discriminating, sources of identification must be slandered and shamed and silenced.
Therefore, in the mind of a moron, like you, human is
not a generalization...but n***** or European or female or male is.
These designations inhibit the uniformity of servitude aimed at. Now all will be judged and gain identity through, their productivity, their servitude and service...and when the quality falls then we will lower the standard of measuring utility so as to incorporate as many automatons into the system of uniformity as possible.
ArtsyFartsy wrote: And why on earth would he allow the beta males to 'protect' his so called 'territory'( i.e. women he wants to have sex with....) instead of backing them down to have his pick of women...like a fucking stag?
Farsty, this is difficult for you? What a dumb-assed **** you must be in real life.
Are you, at least, attractive? I hope so.
Farsty, the dominant male controls the females...where the females are the males are sure to follow. This makes you the perfect 'means to an end', you dumb ****.
These excess, disposable, males play a different, more sly and effete role. They bribe, cajole, become useful to the female in her internal social activities.
In return she allows him to copulate with her in secret...away from the prying eyes of the dominant male. She retains his services and support and he hopes to fertilize one of her ovum.
It's a mutually dependency based on needs....no transcendental,altruistic, selfless, divine, loving, reasons here, you dumb ****.
Now,
Farstsy, since the abstraction of masculinity, which is the institution, does not have a penis, he does not care with whom you fuck.
Fuck a dog, if you wish, fuck a pig....fornicate with an ape, a n*****, it does not care.
It does not care because it replicates itself
mimetically not
genetically. See, now,
Farsty? the abstraction results in a shift of replication. The institution only cares what ideas, principles, beliefs the offspring possesses, not what bloodlines it carries in its genes...because these determine its survival. It does not care if you have a cripple, a moron, a douche-bag, a n*****, a retard...all it cares is how it thinks and how it behaves accordingly.
It cares about its potential servitude.
It's already
mind-fucked sluts, like you, and impregnated them with its
ideals...in the modern western case these are distinctly
nihilistic: Judaism in turn then morphing into Islamic and Christian offspring (see how memes replicate,
Fartsy?)...and then secularized into Communism and Humanism to make them even more universal, viral.
See,
Fartsy, Judaism was too restrictive...it had to merge with segments of Hellenism, mainly Platonism, so as to make ti more infectious to the multiplicity. But even Islam and Christianity was a bit too restrictive so it went further, shedding its godly mantle and becoming purely abstract and universal: Communism, Humanism. It could not infect, impregnate, across cultural, racial, sexual, national spiritual lines. It could fuck the world over, offering the same message of hope to the myriads of morons, like you
Fartsy, so unable to cope with the world...with nature.
And you, being the good **** that you are, spread your legs, and let the universal penis of all-annihilation into your womb. Now here you are spreading your pheromones and trying to birth more emasculated, effete, genetic feces...but, according to you, mimetic gold.
So, you are already its bitches...even if you consider yourselves "Liberated" from
paternalism. The only thing you liberated yourselves from is the lowly
beta-male who was once needed and so was given his small piece of the pie; his
kingdom of family. He, now, is forced into surrogate feminine roles, so as to get to be the sperm donor to the real alpha-males ongoing mimetic orgy.
You can now wear trousers, strap on a six-shooter and talk the talk, can't ya bitch?! The gaping wound between your legs is healed, in your fantasy...and you can now be equal to man.
Proof being that you can now get paid as much as he does.
And this abstracted male entity fucks and fucks and fucks you bitches to death...and you love it because as bitches you love being dominated, protected, taken care of, told what to do, how to do it and when to do it. You especially love it when you are told what to think and how to think it. You never question, you never challenge; you surrender and remain mediocre and normal.
This is why you make perfect followers - supporters; you educate yourselves only to become
regurgitators of the
status quo. Females are conservative, by nature, because their sexual role depends on stable harmonious social environments.
They will bend over for anyone just as long as he promises a long term stability and peace and certainty.
You are agents of chaos, nature in other words, attracted to your opposite: the masculine order. This is why the institution is your
perfect mate and why you are always fashion trend oriented and defenders of the norm, the current, the modern.
You are mindless agents of chaos, so why would you be attracted to it? You are attracted to masculine order, authority, dominion...even if you belittle it as delusional and ephemeral.
The masculine, on the other hand, being an agent of order, is attracted to chaos...ergo he is drawn to the feminine and its chaos...and finds Dionysius fascinating.
ArtsyFartsy wrote:I will tell you why...it is because women have tamed him (or at least the illusion of him that we allowed in the past) using only their wits. Women have realized that the 'alpha male' does not exist . And we have used this to societies benefit. We control him... no doubt about it. If we didn't...he could over power us with his brawn....but never with his brains.
Ha!
This,
Fartsy, is like saying that cows tamed man, making him be their caretaker...or dogs claiming that they domesticated man, turning him into their benefactor.
Fartsy, outside the protective shield of masculinity, you cunts would be raped and abused constantly. This is why in the wild females manipulate beta-males, but never alphas, into being their allies so as to deal with the internal female strife and with unwanted male attentions.
The alpha always gets his way.
Females have never invented, thought , created anything that revolutionized human thought and expanded human understanding. They are good bit-players, supporters, followers...they follow recipes and established methodologies and make good workers. It goes against their nature to do so: to challenge authority, to question the established power.
Do you manipulate lower males, beta-males, definitely. This is what I said, **** in the thread asking
can males be feminists.
It's part of the beta-male sexual methodology to make of themselves
the perfect carpets for females to step all over. They become even more fanatical defenders of female "rights" than females do...because they've invested their integrity, their reason, their pride to a strategy they cannot turn away from.
Women then look down on them...like you do
Farsty, considering them inferior and weak...because they are.
They are beta-males, after all. In modern human terms they are also called: enlightened males, or nice guys or modern or metrosexuals.
ArtsyFartsy wrote:Now I ask you to take a look around yourself and listen to your own words...and then ask yourself....why am I even suggesting that there is such a thing as the 'alpha male' if by my own admission he is too weak to take control of the world. You are living a fairy tale...no different than the child who believes in Santa Claus.
Oh
Farstsy, have you never watched a documentary?
Have you closed your eyes so shut, ****, that reality is now fantasy and fantasy is reality?
Have you read Baudrillard,
Farsty?
Do you even understand what an "alpha-male" is,
Farsty?
Has your need for equality, leading to uniform dullness, reached a level where you deny your own senses, ****?
ArtsyFartsy wrote:Bottom line you can't have both an 'alpha male' and a stronger feminine type which has controlled the alpha male.
Oh
Farsty, you poor, poor, pathetic, simple ****.
It's a good thing there's a dominant masculine entity protecting you from your own stupidity, otherwise you would be someone's bitch....and loving it.
You would know what an "alpha" was then. But, living in your sheltered, anti-nature, world all you have to go by are the beta-males, in relation to whom you feel superior...and comfortable because of it.
Farsty, outside your cocoon, you would be my bitch...and I'm a homo.
Good luck with the effete fags you call male in your immediate environment.
They sound atrocious...but easy.
ArtsyFartsy wrote:So why is there even such a thing as feminism? Because his 'so called' power is benign. Hence he doesn't exist.
Farsty,
Farsty...such mind-farts might stink up the place.
I can see from your performance here and in the past, what a formidable **** you are..no?
I bet those men you hang around with do not stand a chance against your simplicity.
What a low men have been reduced to; to have a simpleton, ****, like you, being more clever than they are.
Oh
Farsty, if there were no laws, no rules, no institution...what an entertaining **** you would be.
I would have so much fun with ya.
But then, have you come across someone like me, and if you have, did they care to correct your delusions?
I suspect, given my impression about your physical value, that no, they did not. They must have smiled, tilted their heads and allowed you to go on being the stupid **** that you are.
But here, it's different, no?
Here, there's
Satyr.
****, to explain to a moron, like you, how Judaism, the slavishness and hidden self-flattering arrogance of it, combined with segments of Hellenic thought (paganism) to create the disease of Islam and Christianity; why it was necessary at the time and place where it took hold, when these nihilistic ideals were around for millenia before; how this lead to an internal strife you might know as the
Cold War, how Hitler was the last stand of the old, caricatured by his Germanic mind, and how this older spiritual nihilism lead to Communism, the secular version of the same shit, and then to liberalism and humanism, would be a waste of my time...particularly when the above suffices to accomplish what I came here to accomplish.
I want you,
Farsty, and your ilk, to remain as you are.
I do not want you to change because change would force me to adjust, in turn.
Farsty, I want you to consider the emasculated, effete, fags, you call men, to be the men you think have always existed or that are universal.
They are, indeed, pathetic...and needy, and easy to manipulate with your pussy, wrinkled and smelly and void and barren as it might be.
I am a mythical creature,
Fartsy...I do not exist.
Is this the mask...or is my social face the mask?
I bet, if you ever met me face to face, you would come to like me.
I, on the other hand, would still think of you as a dumb ****...but I would never tell you,
Farsty....I would enjoy you in all your joyous simplicity.
