Page 2 of 6
Re: Sunday Sermon 1st July 2012
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:58 pm
by Arising_uk
The Jesus Head wrote:...
You should not be so confident as to claim that your judgement coincides with that of others
when your supposition is strictly general. ie all things said by Arising we be agreed upon.
What we know about you is that Arising has a secret connection with yourself ,that is not so secret with me. lick lick
...
Correction. What a shit-stirring little attention seeker you are.
Still, won't be long before the new meds your shrink has given you wear off and you'll lose the plot and get banned once again. Woof! Woof! eh!
Re: Sunday Sermon 1st July 2012
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:01 pm
by chaz wyman
artisticsolution wrote:chaz wyman wrote:
There are many more people with far more creativity than she would have ever had, that lead long and fruitful lives.
You have no thesis here.
All her best work was due to Mark Ronson's excellent music experience and taste. His instrumentation and arrangement of that and other of her songs made her the star she so temporarily was.
All you have to do is to contrast her own version of Rehab with Mark's final version to know what I am talking about.
Oh yeah...if you look really really close in this video you can see the strings in which Mark is controlling his little marionette Amy....Not!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqSKVv6YO8g
Here is Mark's version with his marionettes pretending to be Amy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HLY1NTe04M
Even though it is her voice...it completely misses her essence...and THAT was her art. Her essence came through her pores not to be duplicated or arranged by anyone. Sure, artists can collaborate...but that in no way implies that one is better than the other.
I did not imply either.
This sort of attack does not suit you.
Re: Sunday Sermon 1st July 2012
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:02 pm
by chaz wyman
The Jesus Head wrote:
Any had a great voice and was able to write interesting and biographical lyrics - however she never became a great singer, simply because she had an addictive personality, access to drugs, and an unlimited supply of cash to buy the stuff.
Even more nonsense. She was regarded as another Billy Holiday and in my expert opinion she was an exceptional vocalist.
:
Actually I do have some experience in the music industry.
And Billy Holiday lived a long life because she was not a drug addict nor a drunk. Which is exactly the point I was making thanks.
Re: Sunday Sermon 1st July 2012
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:10 pm
by The Jesus Head
Arising_uk wrote:The Jesus Head wrote:...
You should not be so confident as to claim that your judgement coincides with that of others
when your supposition is strictly general. ie all things said by Arising we be agreed upon.
What we know about you is that Arising has a secret connection with yourself ,that is not so secret with me. lick lick
...
Correction. What a shit-stirring little attention seeker you are.
Hardly . Let us face it ,no one knows who I am, so how in logics name ,could that be, you foolish
chicken.
Re: Sunday Sermon 1st July 2012
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:12 pm
by Arising_uk
The Jesus Head wrote:Hardly . Let us face it ,no one knows who I am, so how in logics name ,could that be, you foolish
chicken.
Not logic, writing style. Woof! Woof!
Re: Sunday Sermon 1st July 2012
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:13 pm
by The Jesus Head
chaz wyman wrote:The Jesus Head wrote:
Any had a great voice and was able to write interesting and biographical lyrics - however she never became a great singer, simply because she had an addictive personality, access to drugs, and an unlimited supply of cash to buy the stuff.
Even more nonsense. She was regarded as another Billy Holiday and in my expert opinion she was an exceptional vocalist.
:
Actually I do have some experience in the music industry.
Ok ok let us hear what it is.
And Billy Holiday lived a long life because she was not a drug addict nor a drunk. Which is exactly the point I was making thanks.
Look that was not the point of my post was it !
You don't understand the post.
Neither does the chicken.
Re: Sunday Sermon 1st July 2012
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:15 pm
by The Jesus Head
Arising_uk wrote:
Not logic, writing style. Woof! Woof!
What a cretin ! What I mean is no one knows who I am in the real world so why would I be attention seeking ?
How could I get attention.
I think you are throwing your teddy out of the cot again.

Re: Sunday Sermon 1st July 2012
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:16 pm
by The Jesus Head
chaz wyman wrote:
I did not imply either.
This sort of attack does not suit you.
I think you take these kind of rebuffs too personally myself.
[ or as Arising would say " to personally"

]
You will now probably tell me to piss off.
[ or as Arising would say " piss of

]
Yes I'm being a pedant now
[or as Arising would say " a pendant

]
Re: Sunday Sermon 1st July 2012
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:19 pm
by Arising_uk
The Jesus Head wrote:What a cretin ! What I mean is no one knows who I am in the real world so why would I be attention seeking ?
How could I get attention.
I think you are throwing your teddy out of the cot again.


Not in the real world twit, here. Why else would you take any opportunity to mention me? Especially since I'm supposed to be having a nice rest in the wilderness.
Re: Sunday Sermon 1st July 2012
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:20 pm
by Arising_uk
The Jesus Head wrote:[[ or as Arising would say " to personally"

]
It was just my pendantic nativity showing.
Woof! Woof!
Re: Sunday Sermon 1st July 2012
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:22 pm
by The Jesus Head
Arising_uk wrote: Not in the real world twit, here. Why else would you take any opportunity to mention me? Especially since I'm supposed to be having a nice rest in the wilderness.
You really need a nice rest in a nut house pal.

Re: Sunday Sermon 1st July 2012
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:25 pm
by Arising_uk

I'll take you word for that.
You've not yet given your 'qualified' diagnosis of those with a terminal aversion to question answering ?
Re: Sunday Sermon 1st July 2012
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:27 pm
by The Jesus Head
Arising_uk wrote: It was just my pendantic nativity showing.

Me ,one Freudian typo ,you, loads of grammatical gaffs .
I mean who doesn't know the difference between of and off ?
or too and to ?
You cannot possibly have a degree in Philosophy because
you would not have the entry level (GCSE) in English to qualify.
Unless YOU BOUGHT YOUR DEGREE FOR $40 FROM A SPACKER WEBSITE
Did it come with a red ribbon on it

Re: Sunday Sermon 1st July 2012
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:28 pm
by The Jesus Head
Arising_uk wrote:
I'll take you word for that.
You've not yet given your 'qualified' diagnosis of those with a terminal aversion to question answering ?
I have a rule. I do not get embroiled in detailed question answering with complete retards

Re: Sunday Sermon 1st July 2012
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:01 am
by Arising_uk
The Jesus Head wrote:I have a rule. I do not get embroiled in detailed question answering with complete retards

Given your opinion I'd have to ask why you keep seeking my attention then?
My diagnosis of those who avoid answering questions is that they dislike it because it tends to lead to them showing that they don't understand their own thoughts and fear being one of those 'who knows that they know nothing', i.e. sophists.