Philosophy Now Forum

chaz wyman wrote:

SpheresOfBalance wrote:

chaz wyman wrote:
I don't agree with 'you'. It seems you are agreeing with 'me'. I have no idea what your opinion on this matter is, as I don't generally read your posts anymore.

Again, I've just provided you with a mirror image. I baited you, knowing full well how you'd respond, you're textbook! I just took notice, understanding your absurdity, and moved on. But not you, you've just got to comment, a sure sign of a megalomaniac if I ever saw one. The fact of the universe centering around you was disproved with Copernicus, where have you been, oh yeah, stroking yourself no doubt!

I can't believe you actually called a high school'ers mental capacity into question, there's no way you're in your 60's, you're a fucking child and a spoiled one at that! Grow up boy! Obviously she's more mature that your fucking ass, which always shows. It was probably you that caused her to think of the thread in the first place, what a wanker you are!

Ooooooooohhh, temper, temper!!

Consider yourself baited.

Ditto, it's funny how fools believe they can see emotion in text.

SpheresOfBalance wrote:

chaz wyman wrote:

SpheresOfBalance wrote:[
Again, I've just provided you with a mirror image. I baited you, knowing full well how you'd respond, you're textbook! I just took notice, understanding your absurdity, and moved on. But not you, you've just got to comment, a sure sign of a megalomaniac if I ever saw one. The fact of the universe centering around you was disproved with Copernicus, where have you been, oh yeah, stroking yourself no doubt!

I can't believe you actually called a high school'ers mental capacity into question, there's no way you're in your 60's, you're a fucking child and a spoiled one at that! Grow up boy! Obviously she's more mature that your fucking ass, which always shows. It was probably you that caused her to think of the thread in the first place, what a wanker you are!

Ooooooooohhh, temper, temper!!

Consider yourself baited.

Ditto, it's funny how fools believe they can see emotion in text.

You're a fucking child and a spoiled one at that! Grow up boy! Obviously she's more mature that your fucking ass, which always shows. It was probably you that caused her to think of the thread in the first place, what a wanker you are!

chaz wyman wrote:

SpheresOfBalance wrote:

chaz wyman wrote:
Ooooooooohhh, temper, temper!!

Consider yourself baited.

Ditto, it's funny how fools believe they can see emotion in text.

You're a fucking child and a spoiled one at that! Grow up boy! Obviously she's more mature that your fucking ass, which always shows. It was probably you that caused her to think of the thread in the first place, what a wanker you are!

Yes, and I was comfortably relaxed and smiling as I wrote it! You see, in a textual forum, I can do THIS AND MOST FOOLS THINK I"M YELLING, THAT MY BLOOD PRESSURE IS UP, but I just sit here comfortably, tapping buttons, that some might think they see me or know me, but it's actually just an illusion, my son! Now if we were face to face, now that's a different story. Chaz do you care to sit face to face with me so you can see the real me?

SpheresOfBalance wrote: ....... UP, but I just sit here comfortably, tapping buttons, that some might think they see me or know me, but it's actually just an illusion, my son! Now if we were face to face, now that's a different story. Chaz do you care to sit face to face with me so you can see the real me? [/color]

Do I wish to see you? not really.
I'm not sure I'd be particularly inclined to go out of my way.
I'm a little puzzled why you should ask.

alaine de botton says 'i made tons from philosophy,buy one of my books today !'

chaz wyman wrote:

SpheresOfBalance wrote: ....... UP, but I just sit here comfortably, tapping buttons, that some might think they see me or know me, but it's actually just an illusion, my son! Now if we were face to face, now that's a different story. Chaz do you care to sit face to face with me so you can see the real me? [/color]

Do I wish to see you? not really.
I'm not sure I'd be particularly inclined to go out of my way.
I'm a little puzzled why you should ask.

It was rhetorical, as I believed it to drive my point home.

SpheresOfBalance wrote: ....... UP, but I just sit here comfortably, tapping buttons, that some might think they see me or know me, but it's actually just an illusion, my son! Now if we were face to face, now that's a different story. Chaz do you care to sit face to face with me so you can see the real me? [/color]

chaz wyman wrote:

SpheresOfBalance wrote: Do I wish to see you? not really.
I'm not sure I'd be particularly inclined to go out of my way.
I'm a little puzzled why you should ask.

It was rhetorical, as I believed it to drive my point home.

That being the aim, you fail.
You point is opaque

chaz wyman wrote:

SpheresOfBalance wrote: ....... UP, but I just sit here comfortably, tapping buttons, that some might think they see me or know me, but it's actually just an illusion, my son! Now if we were face to face, now that's a different story. Chaz do you care to sit face to face with me so you can see the real me? [/color]

chaz wyman wrote:

SpheresOfBalance wrote: Do I wish to see you? not really.
I'm not sure I'd be particularly inclined to go out of my way.
I'm a little puzzled why you should ask.

It was rhetorical, as I believed it to drive my point home.

That being the aim, you fail.
You point is opaque

Then either, in your case, obviously, the density of gray matter knows no bounds or "The Bravery of Being Out of Range" affords your empty words. Quote: --Roger Waters--

SpheresOfBalance wrote: It was rhetorical, as I believed it to drive my point home.

chaz wrote: That being the aim, you fail.
You point is opaque

Then either, in your case, obviously, the density of gray matter knows no bounds or "The Bravery of Being Out of Range" affords your empty words. Quote: --Roger Waters--[/quote]

It's still opaque, and you seem unable to bring yourself to repeat the point, maybe you are admitting to yourself you do not really have one in the first place.

So tell me why did you ask me if I were to "care to sit face to face"?

It's as simple enough question you have failed to answer.

It is satisfies you to pretend me stupid then so be it.


Either way you are suffering from a failure to communicate.

chaz wyman wrote:

SpheresOfBalance wrote: It was rhetorical, as I believed it to drive my point home.

chaz wrote: That being the aim, you fail.
You point is opaque

Then either, in your case, obviously, the density of gray matter knows no bounds or "The Bravery of Being Out of Range" affords your empty words. Quote: --Roger Waters--

It's still opaque,
No, your understanding is dense!
and you seem unable to bring yourself to repeat the point,
I did and still you missed it!
maybe you are admitting to yourself you do not really have one in the first place.
And maybe your comprehension has been dulled with age.
So tell me why did you ask me if I were to "care to sit face to face"?
Take it in context to see if you are capable, it's quite simple. What were we talking about, can you even remember?
It's as simple enough question you have failed to answer.
You place the burden on me to reiterate due to your density in initial comprehension, ha!
It is satisfies you to pretend me stupid then so be it.
I never said you were stupid. I don't believe anyone is stupid! I only see that people are at differing quantities of ignorant.

Either way you are suffering from a failure to communicate.
You forget that communication is a two way venture, who is failing, the sender, or the receiver. I know that you are the type, that when ever there is miss communication, you 'always' see it as the others fault, and you wonder why I call you a Megalomaniac, ha!

SpheresOfBalance wrote:
It's still opaque,
No, your understanding is dense!
and you seem unable to bring yourself to repeat the point,
I did and still you missed it!
maybe you are admitting to yourself you do not really have one in the first place.
And maybe your comprehension has been dulled with age.
So tell me why did you ask me if I were to "care to sit face to face"?
Take it in context to see if you are capable, it's quite simple. What were we talking about, can you even remember?
It's as simple enough question you have failed to answer.
You place the burden on me to reiterate due to your density in initial comprehension, ha!
It is satisfies you to pretend me stupid then so be it.
I never said you were stupid. I don't believe anyone is stupid! I only see that people are at differing quantities of ignorant.

Either way you are suffering from a failure to communicate.
You forget that communication is a two way venture, who is failing, the sender, or the receiver. I know that you are the type, that when ever there is miss communication, you 'always' see it as the others fault, and you wonder why I call you a Megalomaniac, ha!

Words, words , words, signifying nothing. You are a bore.
Can answer a simple question. What good are you?

do i destroy lives if i do nothing, or if i do something? if i dont stop the lunatic with guns? if i heal people to overpopulate the world? if i eat flies when i ride my bike? if i scratch my ass?

if crazy people dont need money to have fun and philosophers are asking why people who are working like lunatics to get the money and expensive fun, who is the crazy and who is the lunatic? maybe philosophers go mad when thinking those questions in everyday life situations, day by day..?

maybe philosophy is like police work, nursing or drug addiction? like priest they will do it even how less salary they get or even if the work is living hell? we cant stop it like homosexuals? and we see and feel everything differently? ask mad man is he mad or not. and he will ask you to join him if you are jogging and nobody is trying to chase you.

It´s good to train one´s brain by philosophy, maths or cross-words or other things.
Even if you do a simple job a trained mind helps you to stay calm.

Which professions make one most happy ?
If we aspire for happiness at all. Some of us may have been put off happiness by Huxley´s "Brave New World".
Which professions make one comfortably unhappy then ?

philosophy...it ruins lives


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 1461103528#

I beg to differ.

Philosophy makes a life worth living.

But you should not try to be a professional philosopher (a sophist).

Be a gardener or an accountant or a baby-sitter or a guardian who works long shifts during the night and has lots of time to read. Philosophy will keep you going.

Vivent les amateurs !