Philosophy Now Forum

bobevenson wrote:

John wrote:

bobevenson wrote:To call it "Christianity's dominant ideology" is ridiculous and you know it.

However, the Bible seems to view nature instrumentally with Man standing above it.

The truth of that statement should be obvious to anybody who doesn't live in a cave and never comes out.

You are just a waste of time.

chaz wyman wrote:You are just a waste of time.

And you make pathetically stupid statements about Christianity.

bobevenson wrote:

chaz wyman wrote:You are just a waste of time.

And you make pathetically stupid statements about Christianity.

Which John kindly demonstrated to be true, by quoting the appropriate scripture.
It is amazing how ignorant most so-called believers are of their own book, you included.

It is my experience that most people who actually read this stuff and have intelligence end up rejecting it literally, and many end up atheists.

chaz wyman wrote:

bobevenson wrote:

chaz wyman wrote:You are just a waste of time.

And you make pathetically stupid statements about Christianity.

Which John kindly demonstrated to be true, by quoting the appropriate scripture.
It is amazing how ignorant most so-called believers are of their own book, you included.

It is my experience that most people who actually read this stuff and have intelligence end up rejecting it literally, and many end up atheists.

As I've said before, the first 65 books of the Bible are merely wrapping paper for Revelation, the Ouzo-combination 66th ("mankind" = 66 in English gematria simplex, A=1 to Z=26).

bobevenson wrote:

chaz wyman wrote:

bobevenson wrote: And you make pathetically stupid statements about Christianity.

Which John kindly demonstrated to be true, by quoting the appropriate scripture.
It is amazing how ignorant most so-called believers are of their own book, you included.

It is my experience that most people who actually read this stuff and have intelligence end up rejecting it literally, and many end up atheists.

As I've said before, the first 65 books of the Bible are merely wrapping paper for Revelation, the Ouzo-combination 66th ("mankind" = 66 in English gematria simplex, A=1 to Z=26).

LOL

chaz wyman wrote:LOL

You simply don't understand that Revelation is the greatest short book ever written, and "The Ouzo Prophecy" the greatest short paper ever written, for the general public.

bobevenson wrote:

chaz wyman wrote:LOL

You simply don't understand that Revelation is the greatest short book ever written, and "The Ouzo Prophecy" the greatest short paper ever written, for the general public.

I refer the poster to the answer I gave some time ago.
LOL

bobevenson wrote:

chaz wyman wrote:LOL

You simply don't understand that Revelation is the greatest short book ever written, and "The Ouzo Prophecy" the greatest short paper ever written, for the general public.

I refer the poster to the answer I gave some time ago.
LOL

chaz wyman wrote:

bobevenson wrote:

chaz wyman wrote:LOL

You simply don't understand that Revelation is the greatest short book ever written, and "The Ouzo Prophecy" the greatest short paper ever written, for the general public.

I refer the poster to the answer I gave some time ago.
LOL

You're so goofy, you're starting to repeat yourself. Seek help before dementia completely takes over.

bobevenson wrote: LOL

You're so goofy, you're starting to repeat yourself. Seek help before dementia completely takes over.[/quote]

It's probably best if I no longer respond to you until you have something interesting to say.
I won't hold my breath.

chaz wyman wrote:It's probably best if I no longer respond to you until you have something interesting to say.
I won't hold my breath.

Halleluja!
Praise the Lord!
P.S. What will it take to get you to hold your breath until you pass out?