Page 2 of 2
Re: Does have Universe a sense?
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:26 pm
by Cerveny
chaz wyman wrote:...It is pure speculation that any of this is linked to QM.
Even it is is, QM is still part of the universe...
I am to bet bottle of Jameson it is more linked to QM then Theory of Relativity
Re: Does have Universe a sense?
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 5:06 pm
by chaz wyman
Cerveny wrote:chaz wyman wrote:...It is pure speculation that any of this is linked to QM.
Even it is is, QM is still part of the universe...
I am to bet bottle of Jameson it is more linked to QM then Theory of Relativity
Both things are equally part of the universe.
They are not natural categories , but models employed by humans to help them understand it.
When evidence demands, those theories will have to change - as long as there are humans smart enough to reconcile the appearances with an viable explanation.
But the experience has always been that each move to understand is further complicated with more complexity.