Re: Philosophy of ‘ Vacuum.’ ( Part 1.)
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 11:44 pm
There is some common, general motion here in the Universe. There is no doubt about it.
See inertial motion; see angular motion of stars; see growing ("expansion") of the Universe… see quiet (kinetic) energy of the matter.
We face certain "blowing" of the future towards to the history.
QM describes some sounds/tones that are generated by such blowing. Imagine a flute. If we blow in it we get some (discrete) sound. If we blow stronger or if we change the finger (physical) configuration we get higher or the other harmonic tone… Only discrete spectrum of tones is allowed.
We overrate some QM equations detriment health sense – the known example is the "virtual particles"
There are none here. There are only some dipoles in it... Vacuum is an insulator. Common matter is not corroded by antimatter's component of the vacuum at all. Do are some virtual photons (el.mag field) here in the Universe? Or have we to consider the relict temperature in this context? There are many open questions here 
See inertial motion; see angular motion of stars; see growing ("expansion") of the Universe… see quiet (kinetic) energy of the matter.
We face certain "blowing" of the future towards to the history.
QM describes some sounds/tones that are generated by such blowing. Imagine a flute. If we blow in it we get some (discrete) sound. If we blow stronger or if we change the finger (physical) configuration we get higher or the other harmonic tone… Only discrete spectrum of tones is allowed.
We overrate some QM equations detriment health sense – the known example is the "virtual particles"