The Philosophy Now Forum

Greatest I am wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2026 1:22 am Atheist are even more honest and say that if there is a God, he better be better than the genocidal one Christians and Muslims now adore.

Greatest I am wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2026 1:17 am

Walker wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2026 7:31 am

Greatest I am wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2026 9:24 pm
What do you tell children when they ask if the talking serpent in Eden was real?

I would say yes, of course.

If asked to explain, I would say to the child that because all humans now have inherent knowledge of good and evil, then the theoretical capacity of a human for the understanding of snake messaging, without that inherent knowledge of good and evil, which was Eve’s contextual condition, cannot be ascertained with certainty. Therefore, without the mental static churned up by that inherent knowledge of good and evil, Eve may have well understood the language of snake … just as now, even with the inherent human filter of good and evil (a duality filter borne of physical bi-lateral symmetry), snakes can still transmit rudimentary intent that gets received on the primal frequency. If the child doesn’t understand any of that I would say, maintain attention upon the words and the meaning will reveal when you’re ready to understand, and it will be quite simple.

So you would lie to children.

What a cruel thing to do.

You surprised me.

Walker wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2026 6:38 am Check this out.

Science or Faith? You No Longer Have to Choose
"The origins of the universe, the complexity of life, and the mystery of human consciousness raise profound questions about whether nature alone can explain creation."
https://spectator.org/science-or-faith- ... to-choose/

*

My Comment:
A Godless scientific view is the ultimate non sequitur, e.g.: In the Beginning, although the uncaused Big Bang happened from nothing, since then everything has a cause.

*

You?

Walker wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2026 6:46 am

Greatest I am wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2026 1:22 am Atheist are even more honest and say that if there is a God, he better be better than the genocidal one Christians and Muslims now adore.

Accepting those assertions is another way of saying that if things are going to stay the same then something has to change.

Walker wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2026 6:53 am

Greatest I am wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2026 1:17 am

Walker wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2026 7:31 am
I would say yes, of course.

If asked to explain, I would say to the child that because all humans now have inherent knowledge of good and evil, then the theoretical capacity of a human for the understanding of snake messaging, without that inherent knowledge of good and evil, which was Eve’s contextual condition, cannot be ascertained with certainty. Therefore, without the mental static churned up by that inherent knowledge of good and evil, Eve may have well understood the language of snake … just as now, even with the inherent human filter of good and evil (a duality filter borne of physical bi-lateral symmetry), snakes can still transmit rudimentary intent that gets received on the primal frequency. If the child doesn’t understand any of that I would say, maintain attention upon the words and the meaning will reveal when you’re ready to understand, and it will be quite simple.

So you would lie to children.

What a cruel thing to do.

You surprised me.

On the contrary, that's as truthful an answer as you can find even with an internal search.