The Philosophy Discussion Forum

a pair of skunks are walking down the street

only one releases its fragrance

distinction is distinct but you have to separate the skunks

-Imp

mickthinks wrote: ↑Wed Jul 01, 2026 11:03 am Numbers are distinct. Distinction isn‘t distinct.

So as distinction does not have limits as being distinct?
This is gibberish. Whether that is because English is a second language for you which you haven’t yet mastered, or because your ideas are wildly uncoordinated and unfiltered by reality, sense, and reason, is impossible to discern.

Distinction is distinct from indistinction.

Just save face already....of course it is gibberish to you, you are an idiot. Why? Because you said "distinction isn't distinct". And why is that a stupid statement? Because:

"Distinction is distinct from indistinction"....otherwise "distinction" has no meaning and saying "number are distinct" has no meaning.

Distinction is distinct from indistinction.
lol

Just save face already....
lololol

mickthinks wrote: ↑Wed Jul 01, 2026 10:35 pm Distinction is distinct from indistinction.
lol

Just save face already....
lololol

And the one so "knowledgeable" of number resorts to a cackling madness....so much for rationality.

Basic reasoning forced you to choke on your tongue?