Re: Roll Away The Stone
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:54 am
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
I do not run an institution for the pathological liars either.accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:52 am Since Age is 'god' and you have a come up with a special language to communicate with 'god' then you two should get along nicely and have a spiffing time conversing with each other.
It's clear that you don't even know what you are doing or why you are doing it. It's probably some form of dementia, one that only computer nerds get. You are most likely the first one, given your advanced age. I'm sure it will be a lot more common in the near future.Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:54 amI do not run an institution for the pathological liars either.accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:52 am Since Age is 'god' and you have a come up with a special language to communicate with 'god' then you two should get along nicely and have a spiffing time conversing with each other.
Here, is another prime example of 'this one' not being able to read, and comprehend.
LOL
Who are 'they', exactly?
you comprehension ability is lacking, completely, "phil8659".Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:45 amWhy is it you cannot use a fucking dictionary? Illiterate bitch.accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:44 am Why do you refuse to say what 'it' is? Are you embarrassed because even in your insanity you understand that it will sound ridiculous?
"phil8659", still, believes, absolutely, that there is only one definition for each and every word, and that if absolutely any thing does not align with its own 'made up definitions', then it is 'the other' who is, supposedly, illiterate.Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:45 amWhy is it you cannot use a fucking dictionary? Illiterate bitch.accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:44 am Why do you refuse to say what 'it' is? Are you embarrassed because even in your insanity you understand that it will sound ridiculous?
Don't fret yourself Age, you are not the only person who cannot use a dictionary, but what is odd, is my work is full of geometric figures, Algebraic equations, which anyone who is the least bit educated need no dictionary for.Age wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 3:21 am"phil8659", still, believes, absolutely, that there is only one definition for each and every word, and that if absolutely any thing does not align with its own 'made up definitions', then it is 'the other' who is, supposedly, illiterate.Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:45 amWhy is it you cannot use a fucking dictionary? Illiterate bitch.accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:44 am Why do you refuse to say what 'it' is? Are you embarrassed because even in your insanity you understand that it will sound ridiculous?
'This' really was how closed, blind, and absolutely stupid some people really were, back when this was written.
So what kind of 'dictiionary' do we need to find definitions of whatever it is that is coming out of your plaque-infused brain? Newton's laws are the laws of motion. That's a sentence, in English. One can look up his equations and apply them to real-life scenarios, but I'm sure if someone asked him what his equations were describing then he would have been able to tell them.Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 3:27 amDon't fret yourself Age, you are not the only person who cannot use a dictionary, but what is odd, is my work is full of geometric figures, Algebraic equations, which anyone who is the least bit educated need no dictionary for.Age wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 3:21 am"phil8659", still, believes, absolutely, that there is only one definition for each and every word, and that if absolutely any thing does not align with its own 'made up definitions', then it is 'the other' who is, supposedly, illiterate.
'This' really was how closed, blind, and absolutely stupid some people really were, back when this was written.
So, You cannot read common grammar because you do not know which word in a dictionary fit into a sentence, nor can you read a figure, like any grade school child, nor read an equation, which any high school student should be able to use,
There is no grammar system left for you.
Still, I have no sympathies for assholes.
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 3:27 amDon't fret yourself Age, you are not the only person who cannot use a dictionary, but what is odd, is my work is full of geometric figures, Algebraic equations, which anyone who is the least bit educated need no dictionary for.Age wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 3:21 am"phil8659", still, believes, absolutely, that there is only one definition for each and every word, and that if absolutely any thing does not align with its own 'made up definitions', then it is 'the other' who is, supposedly, illiterate.
'This' really was how closed, blind, and absolutely stupid some people really were, back when this was written.
How could the two even be close to being related, let alone actually ever could be?
I.Q. is based on pattern recognition, and you keep demonstrating that yours is 0.Age wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 3:45 amPhil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 3:27 amDon't fret yourself Age, you are not the only person who cannot use a dictionary, but what is odd, is my work is full of geometric figures, Algebraic equations, which anyone who is the least bit educated need no dictionary for.Age wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 3:21 am
"phil8659", still, believes, absolutely, that there is only one definition for each and every word, and that if absolutely any thing does not align with its own 'made up definitions', then it is 'the other' who is, supposedly, illiterate.
'This' really was how closed, blind, and absolutely stupid some people really were, back when this was written.
So, for absolutely any one to find out what personal definition you are using for any word all they have to is to be aware that you claim your so-called 'work' is full of geometric figures, Algebraic equations, and, somehow they inform others of what definitions you have and use.
Again, the more you write the more insane you appear.How could the two even be close to being related, let alone actually ever could be?
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 4:04 amI.Q. is based on pattern recognition, and you keep demonstrating that yours is 0.Age wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 3:45 am
So, for absolutely any one to find out what personal definition you are using for any word all they have to is to be aware that you claim your so-called 'work' is full of geometric figures, Algebraic equations, and, somehow they inform others of what definitions you have and use.
Again, the more you write the more insane you appear.How could the two even be close to being related, let alone actually ever could be?
So who then is 'it', exactly, that 'you' so-call keep 'arguing' against, here?
Like every sociopath, anyone examining the pages, which you deliberately lie in exaggeration about, are fully explained as they parallel, geometry, arithmetic and algebra, all you are saying is, like Age, you are illiterate in all four of our systems of grammar. However, you have the addition of being a sociopath, who can do nothing by bitch and lie.accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 5:39 am So, you have taken the trouble to put together 700 volumes of diagrams, with a thousand pages each, but you refuse to say what the diagrams do or represent. Makes sense![]()