Philosophy Now Forum

popeye1945 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 18, 2025 10:03 pm

Impenitent wrote: ↑Thu Sep 18, 2025 1:08 pm you don't...

you have linguistic agreement with other people

-Imp

Knowing is for the individual, experience, and the understanding of bodily experience relative to its survival and well-being. This is the only source of meaning in the world. To a collective of individuals, it is experience and understanding their bodily experience relative to a common biology, and agreeing on its truth.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 8:03 am There’s nothing outside the text.
Deconstructed discourse of course.

Any claim to know is a secondary reality upon not knowing.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 8:03 am The mind unconsciously attaches to illusion rather than what’s real,

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 8:03 am because the real is the unnamed, and that makes no sense to the mind, as the mind prefers everything to have a name, so it superimposes knowledge via the imagination.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 8:03 am These imagined things are Forms that are never permanent. You can dream something is eternal but that dream will eventually collapse back into pure Emptiness, which is so permanent and Eternal that you can't even think of it or imagine it because there is no form there.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 8:43 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 8:03 am There’s nothing outside the text.
Deconstructed discourse of course.

Any claim to know is a secondary reality upon not knowing.

And, if 'we' were to follow 'this logic', then 'this claim', by "fairy", is just a so-called 'second reality upon not knowing'. And, thus, really, not worthy of being 'looked at', nor accepted and agreed with.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 8:03 am The mind unconsciously attaches to illusion rather than what’s real,

Which is, exactly, what 'the thought' that created that part sentence is providing actual proof for.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 8:03 am because the real is the unnamed, and that makes no sense to the mind, as the mind prefers everything to have a name, so it superimposes knowledge via the imagination.

'I' have already explain how and why 'this' is False, and Wrong. As well as explained what is actually True, and Right.

And, as always if any one who is interested and would like the irrefutable proof, then let 'us' just have a discussion, here.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 8:03 am These imagined things are Forms that are never permanent. You can dream something is eternal but that dream will eventually collapse back into pure Emptiness, which is so permanent and Eternal that you can't even think of it or imagine it because there is no form there.

Again, 'this' is illogical and nonsensical.

But, like always, there is A Truth in what "fairy" says and writes. However, it unfortunately blocks out that 'actual Truth' with its own dreamed up imaginary 'realities'.