Page 2 of 2
Re: *****Truth and Falsity Are Not the Ultimate Reality
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2025 2:56 am
by Eodnhoj7
popeye1945 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 1:12 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 16, 2025 7:08 am
If truth and falsity are but distinctions and the relationship of said truth and falsity is but a distinction then knowledge results in a holographic process of distinctions occuring.
In these respects truth and falsity are subject to distinction processes by which they are not the ultimate occurences, the ultimate reality, as they are subject to the very patterned process which forms them. Discuss.
Ultimate reality is what alters one's biology, giving that biology experience through alteration. This experience is processed through the understanding to produce subjective meaning. The organism does not experience ultimate reality; the organism experiences the body understood as biological meaning. This is why it is said we cannot escape our own subjectivity, for apparent reality is but a biological readout. Its meanings belong to the conscious subject and never really to an objective world. The objective world plays biology like it were its instrument, and the melody it plays on this instrument is apparent reality. To experience a different apparent reality, simply alter your biology, for apparent reality differs with the biology that experiences it; in other words, apparent reality is biologically defined. Biology has many forms, but one essence, and collectively is the source of all measures and meanings. Experience is truth, yet fallible; it may not always agree with the physical world, but it is always true to the state of the biology having the experiences. There are as many apparent realities as there are life forms or species.
Ultimate reality is a distinction by degree of being distinct from illusion.
Experience follows this same nature.
Biology is a distinction of overlapping conditions.
Re: *****Truth and Falsity Are Not the Ultimate Reality
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2025 3:04 am
by Phil8659
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 2:55 am
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 2:41 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 16, 2025 7:08 am
If truth and falsity are but distinctions and the relationship of said truth and falsity is but a distinction then knowledge results in a holographic process of distinctions occuring.
In these respects truth and falsity are subject to distinction processes by which they are not the ultimate occurences, the ultimate reality, as they are subject to the very patterned process which forms them.
Discuss.
Well, let us see, is it possible o discuss anything with a person who needs to hug a whole library of books before they are able to make one cogent statement?
True and false are judgments, moron.
Last time I checked, to make a judgement is to make a distinction as a judgement is subject to being a distinction.
Well next time you go checking, try opening the [DELETED] book. A noun is not a verb.
Re: *****Truth and Falsity Are Not the Ultimate Reality
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2025 3:07 am
by Eodnhoj7
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 3:04 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 2:55 am
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 2:41 am
Well, let us see, is it possible o discuss anything with a person who needs to hug a whole library of books before they are able to make one cogent statement?
True and false are judgments, moron.
Last time I checked, to make a judgement is to make a distinction as a judgement is subject to being a distinction.
Well next time you go checking, try opening the [DELETED] book. A noun is not a verb.
Apparently you should read the book yourself as there is no issue with that here....you appear deeply incoherent everytime your anger rises.
Re: *****Truth and Falsity Are Not the Ultimate Reality
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2025 3:13 am
by Phil8659
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 3:07 am
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 3:04 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 2:55 am
Last time I checked, to make a judgement is to make a distinction as a judgement is subject to being a distinction.
Well next time you go checking, try opening the [DELETED] book. A noun is not a verb.
Apparently you should read the book yourself as there is no issue with that here....you appear deeply incoherent everytime your anger rises.
Okay, tell me how a synonym is different from itself? If you claim that a noun is both a noun and a verb, did you say anything that was not gibberish.
The recursion in grammar is noun = noun and verb. i.e., container equals some container with such a relative.
So no you are not the least bit correct.
You do not know how recursion in grammar takes place. Try a writing equations to geometric figure.
Re: Truth and Falsity Are Not the Ultimate Reality
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2025 3:53 am
by Eodnhoj7
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 3:13 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 3:07 am
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 3:04 am
Well next time you go checking, try opening the [DELETED] book. A noun is not a verb.
Apparently you should read the book yourself as there is no issue with that here....you appear deeply incoherent everytime your anger rises.
Okay, tell me how a synonym is different from itself? If you claim that a noun is both a noun and a verb, did you say anything that was not gibberish.
The recursion in grammar is noun = noun and verb. i.e., container equals some container with such a relative.
So no you are not the least bit correct.
You do not know how recursion in grammar takes place. Try a writing equations to geometric figure.
Noun and verb are distinct in the context of English.
A cat is effectively a process of emergence and dissolution of conditions.
The dichotomy you assert is a language paradigm, a process of how distinctions occur. Language paradigms are limited by themselves.
As said before, a cat is a process of interwoven conditions as a new condition.
In the context of the above sentence noun and verb can overlap while being distinct.
It is called multivalent non-dualism...if you are educated as you try to appear this term should be trivial to you.
Re: Truth and Falsity Are Not the Ultimate Reality
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2026 11:26 am
by Iwannaplato
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 16, 2025 7:08 am
If truth and falsity are but distinctions and the relationship of said truth and falsity is but a distinction then knowledge results in a holographic process of distinctions occuring.
In these respects truth and falsity are subject to distinction processes by which they are not the ultimate occurences, the ultimate reality, as they are subject to the very patterned process which forms them.
Discuss.
Perhaps a better criterion than true/false is 'what happens if I move forward with assertion X?'
I suppose that's a kind of pragmatism, but I want it not to even be a universal pragmatism. What happens if I assume X? What do I do and what does that lead to? What attitude does it foster and what does that lead to? What actually happens in my lived life when that is a part of me or a stronger part of me or I believe it more of the time and with greater certainty?