Philosophy Now Forum

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Fri Jul 04, 2025 7:11 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Jul 04, 2025 6:27 pm The man has spoken. All hail the man

I assume you would say the same about a PDF file saying disgusting things about children.

Saying... what about children? The same thing he said about women in that video? That is not natural to be attracted to them?

If a pedophile said it's not natural to be attracted to children, I'd be like... yeah, you're right, it's not! This pedophile got something right! Isn't that something?

That's not what I said and you know it. Oh, but it's just a small number. Don't worry about it. Many of these men also make open death threats towards women. That man in the video most likely isn't gay. He's probably straight. Perhaps even married. He's getting off on himself AS a 'woman'--like Buffalo Bill.

https://x.com/Skirt_Go_Spinny/status/16 ... 3884676135

And yeah, there have always been fetishes, indulged in private alone or between consenting adults. But when they encroach on the rights and safety of OTHERS (i.e. women and children), becoming more and more 'normalised' and increasingly depraved, then there is a major problem. A lot of these men have access to children.

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Jul 04, 2025 10:48 pm

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Fri Jul 04, 2025 7:11 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Jul 04, 2025 6:27 pm The man has spoken. All hail the man

I assume you would say the same about a PDF file saying disgusting things about children.

Saying... what about children? The same thing he said about women in that video? That is not natural to be attracted to them?

If a pedophile said it's not natural to be attracted to children, I'd be like... yeah, you're right, it's not! This pedophile got something right! Isn't that something?

That's not what I said and you know it.

I don't know WHAT you said. You're being vague as hell and expecting other people to fill in the blanks. A guy spiels on for 5 minutes, saying many things, many many many things, and you just refer to all of it as "the same thing". You can't genuinely expect someone to know WHICH same thing from that, come the fuck on accelefine. Use your words.

Why are you linking to so many random tweets? Who cares what random people tweet? Genuinely, who cares? Some guy gets off on saying dumb shit about women and femme fags - who cares? Some person tweets about "what is a woman - wrong answers only" - who cares? I think you might have a twitter problem. If you've gotten to the point that you're getting bent out of shape about the most random insignificant peoples tweets, you have a problem.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 9:23 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Jul 04, 2025 10:48 pm

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Fri Jul 04, 2025 7:11 pm

Saying... what about children? The same thing he said about women in that video? That is not natural to be attracted to them?

If a pedophile said it's not natural to be attracted to children, I'd be like... yeah, you're right, it's not! This pedophile got something right! Isn't that something?

That's not what I said and you know it.

I don't know WHAT you said. You're being vague as hell and expecting other people to fill in the blanks. A guy spiels on for 5 minutes, saying many things, many many many things, and you just refer to all of it as "the same thing". You can't genuinely expect someone to know WHICH same thing from that, come the fuck on accelefine. Use your words.

Why are you linking to so many random tweets? Who cares what random people tweet? Genuinely, who cares? Some guy gets off on saying dumb shit about women and femme fags - who cares? Some person tweets about "what is a woman - wrong answers only" - who cares? I think you might have a twitter problem. If you've gotten to the point that you're getting bent out of shape about the most random insignificant peoples tweets, you have a problem.

So you don't care what women have to put up with. Fuck off then.

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 9:38 am So you don't care what women have to put up with. Fuck off then.

Linking to random insignificant peoples tweets is not a great way of talking about what women put up with. I sincerely doubt most women put up with hearing on a daily basis that what men really want is effeminate fags. Do you geuinely think women deal with that as a constant problem?

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 9:23 am If you've gotten to the point that you're getting bent out of shape about the most random insignificant peoples tweets, you have a problem.

Engagement farming on Twitter and TikTok is all about getting you to spend time with their content so that you can be monetized. To that end they don't care if you are enraged or delighted so long as you don't just scroll by without noticing. Rage is reliable and easy to mine, and so ragebait is a profitable enterprise even though it seems counterintuitive to create content specifically to provoke the least possible happiness in your audience.

Accelafine is much like those engagement farmers. She doesn't make money by engaging people in meaningless shouting matches on the internet, she simply feeds her conflict oriented personality disorder. She's perfectly evolved to scroll twitter feeds getting enraged, it's her only interest in life.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 9:50 am

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 9:23 am If you've gotten to the point that you're getting bent out of shape about the most random insignificant peoples tweets, you have a problem.

Engagement farming on Twitter and TikTok is all about getting you to spend time with their content so that you can be monetized. To that end they don't care if you are enraged or delighted so long as you don't just scroll by without noticing. Rage is reliable and easy to mine, and so ragebait is a profitable enterprise even though it seems counterintuitive to create content specifically to provoke the least possible happiness in your audience.

Accelafine is much like those engagement farmers. She doesn't make money by engaging people in meaningless shouting matches on the internet, she simply feeds her conflict oriented personality disorder. She's perfectly evolved to scroll twitter feeds getting enraged, it's her only interest in life.

She's the perfect target audience for this shit then. Amazing.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 9:50 am

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 9:23 am If you've gotten to the point that you're getting bent out of shape about the most random insignificant peoples tweets, you have a problem.

Engagement farming on Twitter and TikTok is all about getting you to spend time with their content so that you can be monetized. To that end they don't care if you are enraged or delighted so long as you don't just scroll by without noticing. Rage is reliable and easy to mine, and so ragebait is a profitable enterprise even though it seems counterintuitive to create content specifically to provoke the least possible happiness in your audience.

Accelafine is much like those engagement farmers. She doesn't make money by engaging people in meaningless shouting matches on the internet, she simply feeds her conflict oriented personality disorder. She's perfectly evolved to scroll twitter feeds getting enraged, it's her only interest in life.

You can fuck off too with your pathetic amateur psychoanalytics and faux 'liberalism', paedo.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 9:50 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 9:38 am So you don't care what women have to put up with. Fuck off then.

Linking to random insignificant peoples tweets is not a great way of talking about what women put up with. I sincerely doubt most women put up with hearing on a daily basis that what men really want is effeminate fags. Do you geuinely think women deal with that as a constant problem?

They only have to put up with them in their women-only spaces, dipshit. What rock have you been living under? And I've never been on Tik Tok.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 9:54 am

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 9:50 am

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 9:23 am If you've gotten to the point that you're getting bent out of shape about the most random insignificant peoples tweets, you have a problem.

Engagement farming on Twitter and TikTok is all about getting you to spend time with their content so that you can be monetized. To that end they don't care if you are enraged or delighted so long as you don't just scroll by without noticing. Rage is reliable and easy to mine, and so ragebait is a profitable enterprise even though it seems counterintuitive to create content specifically to provoke the least possible happiness in your audience.

Accelafine is much like those engagement farmers. She doesn't make money by engaging people in meaningless shouting matches on the internet, she simply feeds her conflict oriented personality disorder. She's perfectly evolved to scroll twitter feeds getting enraged, it's her only interest in life.

She's the perfect target audience for this shit then. Amazing.

She might very well be the future. Look upon her embittered works and gasp in awe. One day them AI bot things will do everything for us, and humans will just be these bowls of goo that scroll their phones, occasionally crying out "I don't understand this tweet, but it makes me mad!"

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 10:00 am

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 9:54 am

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 9:50 am
Engagement farming on Twitter and TikTok is all about getting you to spend time with their content so that you can be monetized. To that end they don't care if you are enraged or delighted so long as you don't just scroll by without noticing. Rage is reliable and easy to mine, and so ragebait is a profitable enterprise even though it seems counterintuitive to create content specifically to provoke the least possible happiness in your audience.

Accelafine is much like those engagement farmers. She doesn't make money by engaging people in meaningless shouting matches on the internet, she simply feeds her conflict oriented personality disorder. She's perfectly evolved to scroll twitter feeds getting enraged, it's her only interest in life.

She's the perfect target audience for this shit then. Amazing.

She might very well be the future. Look upon her embittered works and gasp in awe. One day them AI bot things will do everything for us, and humans will just be these bowls of goo that scroll their phones, occasionally crying out "I don't understand this tweet, but it makes me mad!"

So you actually think it's ok for men to openly talk about women like that (and there's MUCH worse out there) while getting all butt-hurt when I criticise men? You revolting little hypocritical pos. And you have the nerve to criticise godelian. You are worse than him. Get off my fucking thread.

Too cowardly to address me directly. And how do you know I"m a 'she'? You bigoted wanker.

When you really piss her off, she always does that double reply thing.

And there are quite a few men standing up for women in this--the decent, intelligent ones. They risk a lot too. The troon lobby (that the scarecrow man obviously belongs to) is really powerful. That's because a lot of powerful men are also revolting perverts and paedophiles.

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 9:56 am

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 9:50 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 9:38 am So you don't care what women have to put up with. Fuck off then.

Linking to random insignificant peoples tweets is not a great way of talking about what women put up with. I sincerely doubt most women put up with hearing on a daily basis that what men really want is effeminate fags. Do you geuinely think women deal with that as a constant problem?

They only have to put up with them in their women-only spaces, dipshit. What rock have you been living under? And I've never been on Tik Tok.

Rock? Well... I'm not in women's only spaces, so whatever "rock" that isn't in women-only spaces, right?

I don't think the video in the OP of this thread really is a general womens' problem. I don't think women deal with this very often. I think it might be just you. Have you ever thought of just... watching this weird fetish shit less often? That might solve your problem.

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Jul 05, 2025 10:03 am So you actually think it's ok for men to openly talk about women like that (and there's MUCH worse out there) while getting all butt-hurt when I criticise men?

People say crazy terrible shit about other people all over the internet. The vast vast majority of men are not talking about women the way this one particular dude is. You saw one particular dude say a bunch of very specific crazy shit, and now you're talking about "men".

An individual man with an individual fetish for saying men prefer man-pussy ... yes, it's "ok" in a general sense for him to do that. As in, he should be free to do that, he shouldn't be in prison or fined for saying "what men really want is effeminate fags".

He should be laughed at, if he says it publicly, because it's funny and amusing.

But one random dude saying a bunch of weird shit... ???? Why are you so bent out of shape about it? So what if a guy wants to fantasize about a world where men prefer man-pussy. Who cares?

You're getting outraged about the most tiny thing. Nobody fucking thinks like that except that dude, and maybe like .001% of the male popuplation. What do you suggest we do about that .001% of the population? Stop them from making their dumb videos about effeminate fags?