Philosophy Now Forum

Age wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 9:10 am

Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 7:40 am

Age wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 3:54 am

What an absolute joke 'this comment' is, here.

'This one' comes, here, claiming that it 'will value philosophy', yet will not inform anyone, here, what 'philosophy' is, to it, exactly, although it was asked, politely, to clarify what 'philosophy' even means to it, and then, laughingly, tells me to answer, for it.

So, 'I' will now answer that the word 'philosophy', to 'this one', means, 'an education course in the study of past writers' works'.

Which then means that 'this one' has claimed that it 'will value the study of past writers' works', here.


Obviously, which is, exactly, why I just asked you a question, politely, and for clarity sake, of how you are defining the 'philosophy' word, here, exactly.

it would have been much simpler, easier, quicker, and far, far more accurate, to have just expressly written how you are defining 'that word', here, exactly, in 'this thread'.

But, for 'now', 'we' will have to use the 'an education course in the study of past writers' works', only.

I didn't ask.

I know, obviously 'I' did. And, just as obvious is 'you' did not just answer, and clarify, 'your view', here.

Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 9:22 am

Age wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 9:10 am

Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 7:40 am
I didn't ask.

I know, obviously 'I' did. And, just as obvious is 'you' did not just answer, and clarify, 'your view', here.

Nobody else needs it and you can't have it.

Age wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 9:42 am

Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 9:22 am

Age wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 9:10 am

I know, obviously 'I' did. And, just as obvious is 'you' did not just answer, and clarify, 'your view', here.

Nobody else needs it and you can't have it.

Okay, and once more 'we' have 'another one' who is absolutely closed, here, 'now'.

Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 10:26 am

Age wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 9:42 am

Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 9:22 am
Nobody else needs it and you can't have it.

Okay, and once more 'we' have 'another one' who is absolutely closed, here, 'now'.

You see! You do know yourself.

Age wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 10:37 am

Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 10:26 am

Age wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 9:42 am

Okay, and once more 'we' have 'another one' who is absolutely closed, here, 'now'.

You see! You do know yourself.

'Trying to' deflect, and deceive, does not suit you human beings.

Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 10:42 am

Age wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 10:37 am

Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 10:26 am
You see! You do know yourself.

'Trying to' deflect, and deceive, does not suit you human beings.

Being grandiose doesn't make you superior, it makes you inferior, alien. Whoops! There I go again. Sorry.

Age wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 10:45 am

Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 10:42 am

Age wrote: ↑Sun May 04, 2025 10:37 am

'Trying to' deflect, and deceive, does not suit you human beings.

Being grandiose doesn't make you superior, it makes you inferior, alien. Whoops! There I go again. Sorry.

It appears that 'this one' really can not, still, see that it is the one with the 'grandiose superiority complex' by believing that it comes from the so-called 'most bellicose country', in the whole of history, itself.

Also, imagine you keep doing the same thing, while you keep apologizing for doing the exact same thing.