The Philosophy Discussion Forum

Atla wrote: ↑Fri Mar 07, 2025 10:09 pm

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 07, 2025 10:01 pm

Atla wrote: ↑Fri Mar 07, 2025 9:49 pm
No, perception is not just a way of thinking. But you have absolutely no idea how perception actually works, do you. Neither Plato nor Kant even remotely got it right, but you even mixed them together in an unintelligible way.

Wtf does it even mean that our sense systems are binary? Are you 2400 years behind on psychology and neuroscience?

Absolutely. I am just the guy who demonstrated what has traditionally been called impossible to do. I demonstrated in my Universal Language and the Art of Prophecy, how any one, by their own hand, can draw a computer faster than any binary computer. Input is commensurate with output and ever computation is exact. It is called geometry.
So, 2,400 years behind what and who? Negate the definition of a thing. Prove that you can name more than what you can experience, either a noun or a verb, a binary construct. You cannot do it.

You simply cannot think your way out of a paper bag. Show that your own biology your own perception, provides the whole of the naming convention.
What you see, is what you can say. Oh, and feel free to take it literally, like everyone who cannot reason.

Search Phil8659 on the Internet Archive for my posted works.

Word salad. Of course we can only name what we can experience (and naming happens in our "biological" heads). But how does this binary thing you're talking about (whatever it is) follow from that? Are you really as stupid as you appear to be?

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 07, 2025 10:22 pm

Atla wrote: ↑Fri Mar 07, 2025 10:09 pm

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 07, 2025 10:01 pm

Absolutely. I am just the guy who demonstrated what has traditionally been called impossible to do. I demonstrated in my Universal Language and the Art of Prophecy, how any one, by their own hand, can draw a computer faster than any binary computer. Input is commensurate with output and ever computation is exact. It is called geometry.
So, 2,400 years behind what and who? Negate the definition of a thing. Prove that you can name more than what you can experience, either a noun or a verb, a binary construct. You cannot do it.

You simply cannot think your way out of a paper bag. Show that your own biology your own perception, provides the whole of the naming convention.
What you see, is what you can say. Oh, and feel free to take it literally, like everyone who cannot reason.

Search Phil8659 on the Internet Archive for my posted works.

Word salad. Of course we can only name what we can experience (and naming happens in our "biological" heads). But how does this binary thing you're talking about (whatever it is) follow from that? Are you really as stupid as you appear to be?

One of us has extensive and examinable material for anyone to view, and one of us has only a smart ass mouth and worthless words to defend themselves. You are not even as valuable as a paper weight.

Atla wrote: ↑Fri Mar 07, 2025 10:25 pm

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 07, 2025 10:22 pm

Atla wrote: ↑Fri Mar 07, 2025 10:09 pm

Word salad. Of course we can only name what we can experience (and naming happens in our "biological" heads). But how does this binary thing you're talking about (whatever it is) follow from that? Are you really as stupid as you appear to be?

One of us has extensive and examinable material for anyone to view, and one of us has only a smart ass mouth and worthless words to defend themselves. You are not even as valuable as a paper weight.

I see you couldn't answer my question.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:22 am

Atla wrote: ↑Fri Mar 07, 2025 10:25 pm

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 07, 2025 10:22 pm

One of us has extensive and examinable material for anyone to view, and one of us has only a smart ass mouth and worthless words to defend themselves. You are not even as valuable as a paper weight.

I see you couldn't answer my question.

By necessity, you must get a whole lot of that.