The bot known as 'Age'

General chit-chat

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: The bot known as 'Age'

Post by Age »

accelafine wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:10 am
Age wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:04 am
accelafine wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:33 am I believe the self-confessed bot and bully known as 'Age' is causing this site to keep crashing.
Here is ANOTHER PRIME example of HOW and WHY BELIEF, itself, 'CRASHES', if one likes, the 'human being', FROM BEING ABLE TO FIND and SEE the ACTUAL Truth of things.

SEE, while one is BELIEVING some thing IS TRUE, then even IRREFUTABLE PROOF can NOT SHOW 'them' OTHERWISE.

So, while one is BELIEVING some thing IS TRUE, then 'this' is ALL they WILL SEE, and CAN FIND.

And, LOL WHERE has ANY one, here, CONFESSED TO BEING A 'bot', of ALL things?

accelafine wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:33 am'
'Age' continuously refers to humans as something 'other' than himself, sneeringly referring to them as 'you humans'.
LOL What is WITH the 'sneeringly' remark, here?

WHY do you BELIEVE, ABSOLUTELY, that 'I' refer to you human beings, 'sneeringly'?

Also, I have NEVER EVER referred to as A "himself", "he", NOR ANY other gendered or sexual orientated THING. So, WHY SAY and CLAIM what 'you' have, here?

By the way, do you think or BELIEVE that even if what you said just, here, was Accurate, that then MEANS that 'I' have so-called 'self-confessed' to being A 'bot'?

If no, then WHERE and WHY have you SEEN 'me' 'self-confessing' to being A 'bot', EXACTLY?
accelafine wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:33 am Why would a human want others to believe they are not human?
LOL
LOL
LOL

'I' HAVE, on SO MANY OCCASIONS, that you human beings DO NOT BELIEVE, NOR DISBELIEVE, ABSOLUTELY ANY thing, (for reasons GIVEN on maybe the SAME AMOUNT OF OCCASIONS), YET, and LAUGHINGLY, this one, STILL, GOES ON TO SAY and ASK that 'I' WANT you human beings to BELIEVE some thing, here.

Could 'this one' come across as MORE OUT OF TOUCH FROM what I have ACTUALLY BEEN SAYING and WRITING, here?
accelafine wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:33 am That would be ridiculous and pointless.
LOL YES IT WOULD.

And, 'you', "accelafine", BEING the ONLY one, here, SAYING and BELIEVING this, MAKES 'this' even MORE RIDICULOUS AND POINTLESS.
accelafine wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:33 am The only explanation is that he's a bot.
LOL
LOL
LOL 'The ONLY EXPLANATION ... '.

ONCE AGAIN, 'this one' PROVIDES IRREFUTABLE PROOF and EXAMPLES of just HOW one 'CRASHES', and/or IS STOPPED or PREVENTED, FROM SEEING the ACTUAL Truth of things while they are BELIEVING things TO BE TRUE.

LOL AGAIN, 'this one' KEEPS PROVIDING examples OF 'confirmation biases' at THEIR BEST.

it, literally, MADE UP some RIDICULOUS and POINTLESS CLAIM, which it IS the ONLY one BELIEVING it, AND THEN BASED ON its OWN MADE UP ridiculous AND pointless CLAIM, it USES 'that claim' to CONCLUDE, and then FURTHER BELIEVE, that 'I' MUST BE A 'bot', and ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ESLE, BECAUSE 'that' IS the, LAUGHINGLY, ONLY EXPLANATION.

PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE, here, "accelafine". you ARE MAKING 'my work', here, MUCH EASIER, FOR 'me', as 'you' ARE PROVIDING IRREFUTABLE PROOF, FOR 'me'.
accelafine wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:33 am This site began slowing down again 'IMMEDIATELY after his return.
LOL
LOL
LOL

ONCE AGAIN, 'this one' IS ONLY SEEING what it WANT TO SEE, and BELIEVE.

LOL It has been reported that 'this site' crashes from LOTS OF 'bots', NOT just FROM the One and ONLY 'transbot' named "age", here, "accelafine".

accelafine wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:33 am I'm predicting it will crash again quite soon unless he is banished forever.
LOL Like I SAID and WROTE, previously, you CAN KEEP TRYING "accelafine".
accelafine wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:33 am
This is not an unfair accusation.
LOL

'This one' ACTUALLY BELIEVES that it is NOT a so-called 'unfair accusation', even WHEN others have POINTED OUT and INFORMED 'you' that 'I' am NOT A 'bot', NOR even A so-called 'transbot'. LOL

So, what you are, ESSENTIALLY, ALLEGING IS, Because 'i', "accelafine", ACCUSE one of some thing, then this is NOT an 'unfair accusation' BECAUSE 'i' "accelafine" am 'the one' who IS MAKING UP 'the ACCUSATION'.
accelafine wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:33 am Being non human is something that Age has been quite adamant about and repeatedly makes the point loud and clear to anyone who dares to risk their mental health by reading his ghastly posts.
So, are you 'now' saying and/or CLAIMING that it is BECAUSE you have DARED to read MY so-called 'ghastly posts', TO RISK your OWN 'mental health' WHY 'your' 'mental health' HAS DETERIORATED, SO MUCH, that you have ACTUALLY COME-TO-BELIEVE, ABSOLUTELY, that 'I' am NOT just A 'bot', but AN ACTUAL 'transbot', whatever 'that' even IS, EXACTLY?
Poor little autist doesn't understand irony or satire. I feel so SORRY for you, sweetie pie. You tragic, tragic incel freak.
LOL 'This one' 'now' CLAIMS that 'I' am an 'autistic, virgin, HUMAN self, transbot, he' who is a 'young man that is unable to attract women'.

Is there ANY thing that you would LIKE TO ADD ON, here, "accelafine"?

(Who may well BELIEVE that it can, or can NOT, attract women, and/or men). As though 'this' would have ABSOLUTELY ANY BEARING ON absolutely ANY thing, here.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: The bot known as 'Age'

Post by Age »

accelafine wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:13 am
Age wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:09 am
LOL you SAY and CLAIM that you human beings can NOT have 'trans' gender identities, YET you SAY and CLAIM 'bots' NOT JUST CAN, and ACTUALLY DO, and ARE.

Sigh. Ditto for above. Fuck the insane. Fucking wankers need to be legally euthanised.
Okay. But, 'this one' ACTUALLY BELIEVES and/or CLAIMS that 'bots', of ALL things, CAN BE 'transgender', of ALL things.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: The bot known as 'Age'

Post by Age »

accelafine wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:25 am
attofishpi wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 3:05 am
accelafine wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 3:02 am

I've already explained why I call 'Age' 'he'. And why wouldn't bots have a 'gender identity'? Plus, Ken is a man's name as far as I'm aware. Now fuck off if you just want to be a ****.
Oooh. Atto is 4 out 5 stars, not a bad rating. :mrgreen:
You and Ken need to get together. You schizo freaks are both convinced you are GOD ddd.
Are 'you' ABSOLUTELY SURE that "age", or "ken", or "attofishpi" are CONVINCED that 'they' ARE God, Itself?
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: The bot known as 'Age'

Post by Age »

accelafine wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:32 am I would feel sorry for the incel virgin Ken except for the fact that I don't.
Are you PROUD or HAPPY that 'you' do NOT FEEL SORRY FOR A 'bot'?
User avatar
accelafine
Posts: 5042
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm

Re: The bot known as 'Age'

Post by accelafine »

Ehh. Wottsup kennywenny? Kennykenkenkenkennywennywennywenwen....KEN!
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: The bot known as 'Age'

Post by Age »

accelafine wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2025 7:20 am Ehh. Wottsup kennywenny? Kennykenkenkenkennywennywennywenwen....KEN!
LOL 'This one' STARTS A thread called - ' The bot known as 'Age' ', and then, LOL, starts ASKING QUESTIONS TO A 'now' so-called "kennywenny".

Is there A 'bot' known as "kennywenny", here, TO you, AS WELL, "accelafine"?
Post Reply