Re: UK RAPE GANGS - predominantly Pakistani Muslims
Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 5:22 am
== Tommy Robinson in prison ==attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 2:09 am UK RAPE GANGS - predominantly Pakistani Muslims..(the media are using the term "grooming")
... an issue that Tommy Robinson (*who has relatives that were victims of these disgusting 'humans') has spent time in prison for breaching media suppression gags protecting these vile creatures ...
For a starters, Tommy Robinson is in prison because he accused a Syrian refugee schoolboy -- not a Pakistani -- of all kinds of mischief, while the investigation on the matter and the court case that followed, concluded that Tommy Robinson's publications on the matter were entirely unsubstantiated and in fact total nonsense, and that Tommy Robinson was guilty of libel, slander, and defamation of which the Syrian refugee schoolboy was the victim. In spite of the court order that told Tommy Robinson to stop spreading lies about the Syrian refugee schoolboy, Tommy Robinson refused to comply and was found in contempt of court, for which he was put in prison for 18 months.
This case has nothing to do with Pakistani grooming gangs!
== Tommy Robinson's underage cousin ==
The underage girl was indeed exchanging sex for drugs with a drugs gang.
So, in all practical terms, what did Tommy Robinson expect?Tommy Robinson on his origin story: "My cousin was 13 or 14 when they got her hooked on heroin"
Tommy Robinson:
The police just said "She is a drug addict", and she was a drug addict. She is a child. She ended up climbing out of the window to get back to the "Muslims", for her heroin, for her to get continually raped over and over again as a child ... It was common. The police didn't do anything about it."
Did he expect the British police to put the 14-year old girl under 24/7 surveillance to prevent her from climbing out of the window? Wasn't that rather the job of her parents? In fact, child protective services sometimes do that, but this is not a particularly popular measure. Taking these young girls into protective custody is controversial, to say the least, if only because in all practical terms there is no difference with outright imprisonment. This ends up in the age-old discussion about the merits -- or lack thereof -- of jailing drug addicts into rehab facilities. It can be done but it is absolutely not sure if it should be done, especially in the case of underage drug addicts.
Tommy Robinson also does not mention how the girl's parents reacted to any proposal by Luton city's social services to send their daughter into coercive drug rehab. He is telling just that part of the story that suits his narrative. Her parents did not successfully lock her up (she climbed out of the window), while offers by social services were undoubtedly rejected. Concerning the police -- incessantly blamed by Tommy Robinson for alleged inaction -- they could only refer the case to child protective services. They are simply not in a position to do anything else.
Nobody denies the need to prevent young women from exchanging sex for drugs with drug gangs or to prostitute themselves to fund their drug habit.
Accusing everybody else of "not doing anything", is however, sheer nonsense.
The police already try to hunt down the drug gangs. The "war on drugs" has been going on for decades now. Every police force in the world seems to be failing in that regard, not just the British one. For obvious reasons, incarcerating 14-year old drug addicted girls, is not particularly considered a solution either. Tommy Robinson also blames the Pakistani community of Luton for the problem, but what were they supposed to do besides to keep preaching that Islam strictly forbids the recreational use of drugs?
