Page 2 of 2

Re: Paradox Within Law of Identity

Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2025 6:03 am
by Eodnhoj7
Age wrote: Tue Dec 31, 2024 12:19 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Mon Dec 30, 2024 12:48 pm
Age wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2024 7:07 am

I NEVER 'the questions' mean any thing.

WHY do you see and presume some of the most outrageous things, here?
"I do not mean absolutely anything at all by the questions."
Okay if you say so.
Those are your words.

Re: Paradox Within Law of Identity

Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2025 2:40 am
by Age
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Wed Jan 01, 2025 6:03 am
Age wrote: Tue Dec 31, 2024 12:19 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Mon Dec 30, 2024 12:48 pm

"I do not mean absolutely anything at all by the questions."
Okay if you say so.
Those are your words.
Yes, and I have realized where the contradiction is, or where the perceived contradiction is.

The questions, themselves, do not mean any thing. Just like all words, themselves, do not mean any thing, in and of themselves.

Only 'we' put 'meaning' in words, or give 'meaning' to words. But, again, questions, or words, themselves, do not mean any thing. So, the questions, themselves, do not mean any thing. However, the 'reason' I ask you questions is for the reason I already provided. Which you, obviously, interpret as 'meaning', right?

If yes, then what 'I mean' by asking you questions, or 'the reason' I ask you questions is to see how you answer, and if you actually clarify, or not.

So, is 'this' now settled?

Re: Paradox Within Law of Identity

Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2025 3:06 am
by Eodnhoj7
Age wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2025 2:40 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Wed Jan 01, 2025 6:03 am
Age wrote: Tue Dec 31, 2024 12:19 am

Okay if you say so.
Those are your words.
Yes, and I have realized where the contradiction is, or where the perceived contradiction is.

The questions, themselves, do not mean any thing. Just like all words, themselves, do not mean any thing, in and of themselves.

Only 'we' put 'meaning' in words, or give 'meaning' to words. But, again, questions, or words, themselves, do not mean any thing. So, the questions, themselves, do not mean any thing. However, the 'reason' I ask you questions is for the reason I already provided. Which you, obviously, interpret as 'meaning', right?

If yes, then what 'I mean' by asking you questions, or 'the reason' I ask you questions is to see how you answer, and if you actually clarify, or not.

So, is 'this' now settled?
You gave me an honest response so yes it is settled, we are on the same terms...loosely.

Re: Paradox Within Law of Identity

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 3:08 am
by Age
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2025 3:06 am
Age wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2025 2:40 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Wed Jan 01, 2025 6:03 am

Those are your words.
Yes, and I have realized where the contradiction is, or where the perceived contradiction is.

The questions, themselves, do not mean any thing. Just like all words, themselves, do not mean any thing, in and of themselves.

Only 'we' put 'meaning' in words, or give 'meaning' to words. But, again, questions, or words, themselves, do not mean any thing. So, the questions, themselves, do not mean any thing. However, the 'reason' I ask you questions is for the reason I already provided. Which you, obviously, interpret as 'meaning', right?

If yes, then what 'I mean' by asking you questions, or 'the reason' I ask you questions is to see how you answer, and if you actually clarify, or not.

So, is 'this' now settled?
You gave me an honest response so yes it is settled, we are on the same terms...loosely.
Have I ever not given an honest response?

If yes, then where and when, exactly?

Re: Paradox Within Law of Identity

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 6:06 am
by Eodnhoj7
Age wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 3:08 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2025 3:06 am
Age wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2025 2:40 am

Yes, and I have realized where the contradiction is, or where the perceived contradiction is.

The questions, themselves, do not mean any thing. Just like all words, themselves, do not mean any thing, in and of themselves.

Only 'we' put 'meaning' in words, or give 'meaning' to words. But, again, questions, or words, themselves, do not mean any thing. So, the questions, themselves, do not mean any thing. However, the 'reason' I ask you questions is for the reason I already provided. Which you, obviously, interpret as 'meaning', right?

If yes, then what 'I mean' by asking you questions, or 'the reason' I ask you questions is to see how you answer, and if you actually clarify, or not.

So, is 'this' now settled?
You gave me an honest response so yes it is settled, we are on the same terms...loosely.
Have I ever not given an honest response?

If yes, then where and when, exactly?
Honesty occurs in degrees often times.

Re: Paradox Within Law of Identity

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 8:50 am
by Age
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 6:06 am
Age wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 3:08 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2025 3:06 am

You gave me an honest response so yes it is settled, we are on the same terms...loosely.
Have I ever not given an honest response?

If yes, then where and when, exactly?
Honesty occurs in degrees often times.
ONCE MORE, an ACTUAL ANSWER to the ACTUAL QUESTION/S I ask is NOT PROVIDED.

Re: Paradox Within Law of Identity

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 9:03 am
by Eodnhoj7
Age wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 8:50 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 6:06 am
Age wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 3:08 am

Have I ever not given an honest response?

If yes, then where and when, exactly?
Honesty occurs in degrees often times.
ONCE MORE, an ACTUAL ANSWER to the ACTUAL QUESTION/S I ask is NOT PROVIDED.
That is relative.

Re: Paradox Within Law of Identity

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 10:01 am
by Age
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 9:03 am
Age wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 8:50 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 6:06 am

Honesty occurs in degrees often times.
ONCE MORE, an ACTUAL ANSWER to the ACTUAL QUESTION/S I ask is NOT PROVIDED.
That is relative.
ONCE AGAIN, for the VERY SLOW, absolutely EVERY thing is relative, to the observer.

So, if you 'saw' 'an answer', then 'that' is relative, to you, right?

But, to me, you, still, have NOT YET 'answered' the ACTUAL QUESTION I posed, and asked you.

Re: Paradox Within Law of Identity

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 4:39 pm
by Eodnhoj7
Age wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 10:01 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 9:03 am
Age wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 8:50 am

ONCE MORE, an ACTUAL ANSWER to the ACTUAL QUESTION/S I ask is NOT PROVIDED.
That is relative.
ONCE AGAIN, for the VERY SLOW, absolutely EVERY thing is relative, to the observer.

So, if you 'saw' 'an answer', then 'that' is relative, to you, right?

But, to me, you, still, have NOT YET 'answered' the ACTUAL QUESTION I posed, and asked you.
To me I have.

Re: Paradox Within Law of Identity

Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 7:48 am
by Age
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 4:39 pm
Age wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 10:01 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 9:03 am

That is relative.
ONCE AGAIN, for the VERY SLOW, absolutely EVERY thing is relative, to the observer.

So, if you 'saw' 'an answer', then 'that' is relative, to you, right?

But, to me, you, still, have NOT YET 'answered' the ACTUAL QUESTION I posed, and asked you.
To me I have.
As long as 'you' ARE AWARE that, to 'me', you have NOT, then all is well and good. Well as far as 'I' am concerned, anyway.